DMP Guide: DFG for Sociology & Social Sciences

1. Funder Policy & Open Data Compliance

In alignment with international open-science mandates, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) requires all principal investigators to submit a comprehensive Data Management Plan (DMP) with their grant application. A robust DMP details how research data will be collected, processed, documented, stored, shared, and preserved both during and after the project.

For projects in the field of Sociology & Social Sciences, managing data correctly is essential not only for compliance, but also to support peer-review validation and reproducibility. All DMPs must be submitted through the elan Portal portal, using standard institutional guidelines.

2. Data Types, Formats, and Metadata Standards

A high-quality DMP must explicitly identify the types of data that will be generated and specify open, non-proprietary file formats to ensure long-term usability. For Sociology & Social Sciences, datasets typically range from raw observational measurements to curated computational models.

Since studies in **Sociology & Social Sciences** rely heavily on human survey panels and interviews, participant privacy is a paramount concern. The DMP must document explicit consent agreements, transcript scrubbing techniques, and firewalled database storage to meet **DFG** standards.

To guarantee discoverability, datasets should be documented using standardised metadata schemas that map to the Social Sciences branch of scholarly vocabularies. This ensures indexers and crawlers can crawl and identify research outputs accurately.

3. Step-by-Step DMP Construction Protocol

When preparing your DMP for a DFG proposal, structure your document around these core sections:

1. Data Collection and Generation:
   Describe the methodology, instrumentation, or software used to collect or generate new data. Detail quality assurance and quality control measures implemented at your facility.
2. Documentation and Metadata:
   Explain how the data will be documented, including accompanying read-me files, data dictionaries, and laboratory notebooks. Specify the metadata standards to be utilized (using DDI standard, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set as standard).
3. Ethics, Intellectual Property, and Consent:
   Address how sensitive or confidential datasets will be handled. Detail anonymisation processes, access controls, and compliance with institutional ethics boards.
4. Storage, Backups, and Security:
   State where data will be stored during active research. Detail automated backup schedules, server redundancies, and access authorisation protocols.
5. Long-Term Preservation and Archiving:
   Select the digital repository for post-project archiving (such as ICPSR, UK Data Service, Harvard Dataverse, and directory servers mapped in Sociological Abstracts & Web of Science). Confirm that the repository supports persistent identifiers (handles/DOIs) and provides secure preservation.

Open Science Workflows, Data Curation & Repositories

To secure approval from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation), the investigator's data management plan dmp must clearly justify chosen data collection methods and adhere to active data curation standards. Integrating digital dmptool workflows helps automate compliance reporting via the elan Portal portal. Investigators must outline procedures for post-collection data cleaning, strict audits of data integrity, and programmatic data wrangling to transform raw outputs into clean models. Furthermore, a descriptive data dictionary must be provided to define the database schema. The DMP must justify whether files are catalogued in a structured data warehouse or kept as raw files in a flexible data lake, discussing how a data lake vs data warehouse decision impacts subsequent data analysis and programmatic exploratory data analysis for Sociology & Social Sciences. Upon completion, data will be submitted to the dryad data repository, published as figshare datasets, or preserved via a zenodo data upload to be registered in the global data citation index and satisfy nsf data management plan guidelines and regional DFG open-science rules. Researchers are required to publish systematic data versioning protocols through the open science framework osf to facilitate long-term reproducible data sharing in line with fair data principles examples. If data is collected from specialized regions, the plan must comply with the care data principles and respect indigenous data sovereignty care rights to meet Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) ethical benchmarks. This explicit lifecycle structure meets the standard pre-requisites issued under DFG project management guidelines.

4. Frequently Asked Questions