Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Public review · Phase 5

Open consultations

Candidate dictionary entries pass through a formal public-review window before release. Anyone can comment; the working group must respond on the record.

The public-review window is the editorial protocol's check against an in-group consensus that does not match practice on the ground. Once a working group has drafted a candidate entry — a new term, a revised definition, a deprecation — the entry is published in a formal consultation window. Anyone with an interest can comment. The working group must address comments on the record before the entry can be released.

The pattern

  • Window length. Typically four weeks. Longer for substantive revisions; never less than three.
  • Comment form. Plain English, structured against the entry. Comments are attributed and public; anonymous comments are not accepted, but the comment thread is available without registration.
  • Response obligation. The working group must respond to every substantive comment. The response is published alongside the original.
  • Outcome. The entry proceeds to release unchanged, proceeds with revisions documented in the change log, or returns to the working group for further work.

Why we run it this way

The model draws on the standards-development conventions used by NISO standards committees and the public-comment processes of major editorial bodies including ICMJE. A community-stewarded standard that does not consult publicly will, over time, drift away from the practice it claims to describe. The window is not a formality.

Current consultations

None open

There are no open consultations at this time. The first public-review windows open with the v2026.2 release cycle, once the working groups have produced their initial candidate-entry batches.

What you can do now

If you want to be notified

Open consultations are announced in the monthly CASRAI Bulletin and on the working-group updates page. There is no separate consultation list — the editorial board prefers to keep the channel count low.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →