Generative AI use and disclosure
Vocabulary for human–AI collaboration on research outputs and the disclosure required.
- Meets
- Monthly
Community governance · 24 groups
One working group per dictionary domain. Each is community-run, with a chair, members, and a recurring meeting cadence. Anyone can join. Groups are responsible for proposing, reviewing, and ratifying entries in their domain — and for cross-walks to whichever standards body stewards adjacent vocabulary.
5 working groups in this track
Vocabulary for human–AI collaboration on research outputs and the disclosure required.
Extending CRediT to acknowledged contributors, peer reviewers, technical staff.
Career-stage terms underpinning narrative CVs and mentorship recognition.
Modern outputs taxonomy beyond articles — preprints, datasets, models, protocols, more.
Vocabulary bridging dictionary entries to the scholarly-literature and editorial ecosystem.
3 working groups in this track
ORCID, ROR, RAiD, IGSN, PIDINST, DOIs — the PID landscape.
CRIS, RIM, CERIF, OpenAIRE, JATS — vendor-neutral terms.
Trusted repositories, EOSC, biobanks, data trusts, federated infrastructure.
3 working groups in this track
RDA DMP Common Standard and the ecosystem of maDMP tools.
Workflows, containers, FAIR4RS, Software Heritage, computational reproducibility.
Model cards, system cards, datasheets, benchmarks, evaluation suites.
5 working groups in this track
FFP, paper mills, retractions, COPE / ORI / UKRIO frameworks.
IRB/REC, IACUC, GDPR, MTAs, EAR/ITAR — the compliance lattice.
NSPM-33, foreign component, DURC, dual-use research.
CARE alongside FAIR; TK labels, FPIC, GIDA.
Clinical trial protocols, IND/IDE filings, case report forms, and HIPAA research-disclosure rules.
8 working groups in this track
DORA, COARA, R4RI, narrative CVs.
Diamond OA, APC waivers, Plan S, bibliodiversity.
REF Impact, PPI, citizen science, SDGs.
LEAF, My Green Lab, carbon footprint of research.
Calls, NCE, indirect costs, biosketch, current & pending.
Award administration vocabulary — supplements, FFATA reporting, warranties and covenants, funder-specific terms.
RAiD-anchored project lifecycle, phases, milestones.
Patents, licensing agreements, IP disclosures, and university–industry deal terms.
Governance
Twenty-four groups, one terms of reference. Public review, named contribution, CC-BY output.
Terms of reference
All twenty-four working groups share a common terms-of-reference document — chair role, voting rules, public-review obligations, conflict-of-interest disclosure. Domain-specific scope is set by the group itself within those bounds.
Read the governance model →Meeting cadence
Most groups meet quarterly online for 60 minutes; the GenAI working group meets monthly. Between meetings, candidate entries circulate for written comment with a two-week response window. All meetings are minuted and recorded.
See release cadence →Decision-making
Working groups reach consensus where possible. Where consensus is not reached, the chair calls a recorded vote; a two-thirds supermajority is required to ratify an entry. Unresolved disputes escalate to the editorial board.
Editorial board →Get involved
Working-group membership is free and open. Light commitment — most groups meet 60 minutes monthly or quarterly online. Senior practitioners and early-career researchers both welcome.
Step 1 — Pick a working group
Read the per-group pages above. Each has its remit, scope, deliverables and current seats published. Pick the group whose domain most closely matches your practitioner experience, then use that card's Apply to join button — it opens the form with the group already chosen.
Step 2 — Submit your interest
The application is short — name, institution, ORCID iD (optional), the working group and seat you are applying for, and a paragraph on why this domain. Submit via the application form.
Step 3 — Review and decision
Applications are reviewed against a published rubric. Decisions are returned within four weeks of the close of the open-call window. Unsuccessful applicants are encouraged to participate via public comment and to re-apply at the next round.
Step 4 — Onboard
New members receive a short onboarding pack covering the terms of reference, the editorial style guide, and the current candidate-term pipeline. First meeting attendance is expected within one cycle.
FAQ
Common questions about how the working groups are organised, who can join and how decisions are made.
Each working group has a chair, an optional co-chair and 12 community seats. The chair holds a two-year renewable term, recognised on the editorial masthead. Seats are filled on merit against a published rubric covering domain expertise, institutional diversity, regional balance and an explicit slot for early-career researchers. See /about/governance for the full terms of reference.
Most groups meet quarterly online for one hour; minutes are published and the meeting is recorded. The Generative AI use and disclosure working group meets monthly to keep pace with model releases. Asynchronous review of candidate entries circulates by email between meetings. Public-review windows open once per release cycle.
Working-group seats are voluntary; contributor honoraria are available for chair and co-chair roles to recognise the additional time commitment. All output is released under CC-BY 4.0 and every contributor is named in the release notes and machine-readable editorial-meta block alongside their CRediT role assignment.
Decisions are reached by working-group consensus. Where consensus is not reached, the chair calls a recorded vote; a two-thirds supermajority is required to ratify an entry. Unresolved disputes are escalated to the editorial board. All ratification records are public and linked from the changelog.
Yes — institutional sponsorship supports meeting infrastructure, public-comment publication and contributor honoraria. Sponsors receive named acknowledgement on the working-group page and in release notes. Sponsorship does not confer a guaranteed seat: seat selection remains on merit. Enquiries to [email protected].