DMP Guide: NRF for Sociology & Social Sciences

1. Funder Policy & Open Data Compliance

In alignment with international open-science mandates, National Research Foundation requires all principal investigators to submit a comprehensive Data Management Plan (DMP) with their grant application. A robust DMP details how research data will be collected, processed, documented, stored, shared, and preserved both during and after the project.

For projects in the field of Sociology & Social Sciences, managing data correctly is essential not only for compliance, but also to support peer-review validation and reproducibility. All DMPs must be submitted through the NRF Portal portal, using standard institutional guidelines.

2. Data Types, Formats, and Metadata Standards

A high-quality DMP must explicitly identify the types of data that will be generated and specify open, non-proprietary file formats to ensure long-term usability. For Sociology & Social Sciences, datasets typically range from raw observational measurements to curated computational models.

Social science research in **Sociology & Social Sciences** frequently gathers sensitive human opinions. The DMP must detail explicit participant consent forms, verbatim transcript pseudonymisation protocols, and secure restricted-access storage required by **NRF**.

To guarantee discoverability, datasets should be documented using standardised metadata schemas that map to the Social Sciences branch of scholarly vocabularies. This ensures indexers and crawlers can crawl and identify research outputs accurately.

3. Step-by-Step DMP Construction Protocol

When preparing your DMP for a NRF proposal, structure your document around these core sections:

1. Data Collection and Generation:
   Describe the methodology, instrumentation, or software used to collect or generate new data. Detail quality assurance and quality control measures implemented at your facility.
2. Documentation and Metadata:
   Explain how the data will be documented, including accompanying read-me files, data dictionaries, and laboratory notebooks. Specify the metadata standards to be utilized (using DDI standard, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set as standard).
3. Ethics, Intellectual Property, and Consent:
   Address how sensitive or confidential datasets will be handled. Detail anonymisation processes, access controls, and compliance with institutional ethics boards.
4. Storage, Backups, and Security:
   State where data will be stored during active research. Detail automated backup schedules, server redundancies, and access authorisation protocols.
5. Long-Term Preservation and Archiving:
   Select the digital repository for post-project archiving (such as ICPSR, UK Data Service, Harvard Dataverse, and directory servers mapped in Sociological Abstracts & Web of Science). Confirm that the repository supports persistent identifiers (handles/DOIs) and provides secure preservation.

Open Science Workflows, Data Curation & Repositories

When drafting a data management plan dmp to satisfy NRF guidelines, defining systematic data collection methods and formal data curation standards is vital. Utilizing institutional dmptool workflows ensures that these administrative requirements are built-in from the outset of the study. This includes describing protocols for data cleaning, validating data integrity via checksums, and conducting secure data wrangling on raw source files. Each output dataset must be documented with an explanatory data dictionary mapping key metadata fields. Architecturally, teams can configure either a secure relational data warehouse or a cost-effective cloud-based data lake, evaluating how this data lake vs data warehouse setup supports formal data analysis and immediate exploratory data analysis under NRF guidelines. PIs will facilitate public sharing by leveraging the dryad data repository, creating searchable figshare datasets, or completing a zenodo data upload, ensuring tracking through the data citation index in compliance with nsf data management plan protocols and National Research Foundation targets. The study will document clear data versioning protocols hosted on the open science framework osf to enable reproducible data sharing matching top fair data principles examples. Furthermore, any community-engaged data must respect the care data principles and support indigenous data sovereignty care standards to ensure local governance of shared knowledge under NRF audits. Aligning the archiving schedule directly with NRF open-access metrics protects the project's funding cycles.

4. Frequently Asked Questions