DMP Guide: RGC for Chemistry & Materials Science
Learn how to design a fully compliant Data Management Plan (DMP) that satisfies Research Grants Council open-data policies. Explore optimal file formats, metadata mapping, and repository selection for Chemistry & Materials Science research data.
1. Funder Policy & Open Data Compliance
In alignment with international open-science mandates, Research Grants Council requires all principal investigators to submit a comprehensive Data Management Plan (DMP) with their grant application. A robust DMP details how research data will be collected, processed, documented, stored, shared, and preserved both during and after the project.
Funder-Specific Mandate Directive
The **Research Grants Council (RGC)** open-science policy expects research data in **Chemistry & Materials Science** to be managed, documented, and archived in public repositories supporting persistent identifiers. Plans must be submitted through the **RGC Electronic System** portal.
Verified Funder Open-Science Portfolio
Based on independent, open-science bibliometric data from OpenAlex, the Research Grants Council (RGC) oversees a massive scholarly ecosystem with over 27,441 published research outputs under their funding catalog, accumulating over 1,058,104 citations across the global scientific record. To protect the public's investment in this massive knowledge corpus, the funder strictly enforces FAIR data management and open repository deposits, making compliance with this DMP protocol mandatory for all awarded grants.
For projects in the field of Chemistry & Materials Science, managing data correctly is essential not only for compliance, but also to support peer-review validation and reproducibility. All DMPs must be submitted through the RGC Electronic System portal, using standard institutional guidelines.
2. Data Types, Formats, and Metadata Standards
A high-quality DMP must explicitly identify the types of data that will be generated and specify open, non-proprietary file formats to ensure long-term usability. For Chemistry & Materials Science, datasets typically range from raw observational measurements to curated computational models.
Simulations and code-based datasets for **Chemistry & Materials Science** must be packaged alongside the exact processing scripts and execution environments. Documenting this containerized configuration guarantees that **RGC** audits can reconstruct each analysis step.
To guarantee discoverability, datasets should be documented using standardised metadata schemas that map to the Chemical Actions and Uses branch of scholarly vocabularies. This ensures indexers and crawlers can crawl and identify research outputs accurately.
| DMP Component | Custom Target Value for Chemistry & Materials Science |
|---|---|
| Preferred File Formats | CIF (crystallographic details), JCAMP-DX (spectral data), XML (chemical profiles), CSV (reactions) |
| Metadata Schema Standard | ChEMBL schema, Dublin Core, IUPAC standards |
| Target Scientific Repositories | PubChem, ChemSpider, Zenodo, Figshare, and directory servers mapped in Reaxys & CAS SciFinder |
3. Step-by-Step DMP Construction Protocol
When preparing your DMP for a RGC proposal, structure your document around these core sections:
- Data Collection and Generation:
Describe the methodology, instrumentation, or software used to collect or generate new data. Detail quality assurance and quality control measures implemented at your facility. - Documentation and Metadata:
Explain how the data will be documented, including accompanying read-me files, data dictionaries, and laboratory notebooks. Specify the metadata standards to be utilized (using ChEMBL schema, Dublin Core, IUPAC standards as standard). - Ethics, Intellectual Property, and Consent:
Address how sensitive or confidential datasets will be handled. Detail anonymisation processes, access controls, and compliance with institutional ethics boards. - Storage, Backups, and Security:
State where data will be stored during active research. Detail automated backup schedules, server redundancies, and access authorisation protocols. - Long-Term Preservation and Archiving:
Select the digital repository for post-project archiving (such as PubChem, ChemSpider, Zenodo, Figshare, and directory servers mapped in Reaxys & CAS SciFinder). Confirm that the repository supports persistent identifiers (handles/DOIs) and provides secure preservation.
Open Science Workflows, Data Curation & Repositories
Establishing a robust data management plan dmp for Chemistry & Materials Science requires outlining rigorous data collection methods alongside established data curation standards from day one. PIs can leverage structured dmptool workflows to coordinate these data frameworks for review by Research Grants Council. Our project methodology mandates systematic data cleaning and continuous verification of data integrity to support reproducible data wrangling pipelines. To aid secondary usage, a comprehensive data dictionary will accompany every published record. For active storage, the proposal compares a relational data warehouse schema against an unstructured data lake model, reviewing the functional benefits of a data lake vs data warehouse environment for general data analysis and initial exploratory data analysis of study outputs. Open-access guidelines require teams to push finalised files to the dryad data repository, configure shared figshare datasets, or initiate a zenodo data upload, securing a permanent slot in the data citation index that aligns with nsf data management plan directives. To support replication, we will establish strict data versioning protocols on the open science framework osf to guide reproducible data sharing that follows fair data principles examples. When working with sensitive community records, the project will strictly observe the care data principles and indigenous data sovereignty care guidelines to guarantee ethical data stewardship in accordance with RGC rules. Aligning the archiving schedule directly with RGC open-access metrics protects the project's funding cycles.
4. Frequently Asked Questions
Are we required to share all raw data from our research?
No, RGC policies generally recognise that some data cannot be shared publicly due to privacy, security, intellectual property, or commercialisation constraints. In such cases, your DMP must justify why certain datasets are restricted and describe how metadata will still be made discoverable.
Who owns the research data generated under this grant?
Data ownership is typically held by the host institution, subject to co-ownership clauses in collaborative projects. However, RGC guidelines require that data be made as openly available as possible under open licensing, such as Creative Commons or Open Data Commons.
DMP Specifications
FAIR Principles
Your plan must align with the FAIR Principles:
- Findable: Rich metadata and persistent DOIs.
- Accessible: Free retrieval via standard protocols.
- Interoperable: Open formats and vocabulary alignment (such as ChEMBL schema, Dublin Core, IUPAC standards).
- Reusable: Clear data licensing and reuse guidelines.







