Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAI
Research Ethics & IRB Guidelines

Ethics & Informed Consent: Mixed-Methods Study Design (Chile)

A detailed academic review of the ethical submission protocol, informed consent prerequisites, and reporting standards for conducting a Mixed-Methods Study Design within the regulatory framework of Chile.

Regionally Linked Publications524,914
Aggregated Scholarly Citations18,453,947
Tracked Infrastructure Nodes (ROR)15

1. Ethical Principles & Legislative Framework

In research involving human participants, securing ethical clearance is a critical first step. For a Mixed-Methods Study Design being conducted in Chile, study designs must align with the primary regulatory legislation: Law 20.120 on Scientific Research on Human Beings. This statutory framework ensures participant welfare, confidentiality, and voluntary involvement are protected.

National Ethics Board Clearance Pathway

In Chile, CEC reviews ensure compliance with Law 20.120 and local sanitary codes. Data handling is governed by Law 19.628, requiring strict consent for medical file reviews.

Administrative review and formal approval are managed by a local or regional Comité de Ética Científico (CEC). Researchers must secure full approval or a formal exemption certificate from this board before recruiting any participants or commencing data collection.

2. Study Design Elements & Reporting Integrity

For a Mixed-Methods Study Design, the review board places significant focus on methodological transparency. The application must outline the research rationale, recruitment protocols, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data protection measures.

Study Classification: Minimal to Moderate Risk

Mixed-methods research combines quantitative metrics with qualitative narratives. The ethics submission must detail how participant files are merged and ensure that interview selections remain confidential.

To guarantee academic integrity and reproducibility, the study report and subsequent publications should follow the internationally recognised reporting standard: GRAMMS framework.

Special Directive: Observational Study Protocols

As an observational or non-interventional design, the ethics board primarily focuses on data privacy, secure pseudonymisation, and informed consent. If you are conducting retrospective database research, you may apply for a waiver of consent, provided participant risk is minimised.

3. Informed Consent & Information Sheet Guidelines

A robust participant information sheet and informed consent form are critical parts of the ethical application. Ensure your documentation incorporates the following components:

Design-Specific Consent Focus Areas

Dual-phase consent (quantitative survey + qualitative interview consent), permission to record audio, quotes usage release.

  • Plain Language Explanations: Avoid complex medical or technical terminology. Ensure readability matches the general population.
  • Voluntary Participation: Explicitly state that participation is entirely voluntary and that individuals can withdraw at any time without negative consequences.
  • Confidentiality & Data Controls: Explain how participant data will be anonymised or pseudonymised, who will have access to it, and how long it will be securely retained under Law 19.628 on the Protection of Private Life.
  • Risk/Benefit Disclosure: Clearly list any potential risks, discomforts, or direct benefits associated with participation in the study.
  • Ethics Board Contact Information: Provide the contact details of the reviewing Comité de Ética Científico (CEC) so participants can reach out if they have questions or concerns.

Research Ethics, Clinical Trials & Institutional Governance

Upholding patient privacy during this Mixed-Methods Study Design in Chile is guided by the Belmont Report principles for data stewardship. The protocol must outline safe pathways, particularly if any minor deception in psychological research is used in questionnaires. A standardized research study consent form guarantees that all participants are fully informed under informed consent Belmont Report rules. While observational work rarely requires a clinical trial registration, a signed clinical trial agreement contract is required for health networks. These tracking studies do not utilize live animals regulated by the 3rs replacement reduction refinement guidelines. All records and signed consent sheets must reside on secure local servers in Chile to protect patient privacy and comply with national guidelines.

4. Regulatory Checklist Table

To streamline your ethical review submission, use the structured alignment checklist below:

RequirementComité de Ética Científico (CEC) StandardGRAMMS framework Standard
Consent FormSigned and dated prior to study activity. Focus: Dual-phase consent (quantitative survey + qualitative interview consent).Fully documented recruitment and consent paths.
Risk ManagementComprehensive risk mitigation plan. Storing questionnaire databases and qualitative files on distinct servers with encrypted linking tables.Adverse events reporting strategy.
Data RetentionCompliance with local data protection rules (Law 19.628 on the Protection of Private Life).Provision of open-data options where possible.

5. Academic & Research Infrastructure Matrix (Chile)

The following authenticated registry lists top scientific organizations, clinical laboratories, and research hospitals in Chile mapped via the Research Organization Registry (ROR) standards-compliance framework.

Organization NameSector TypeRegistry Identification
Pacific Hydro ChilecompanyROR ID
Aldeas Infantiles S.O.S. ChilecompanyROR ID
Biomedical Research Consortium-ChilecompanyROR ID
Abbott (Chile)companyROR IDWikidata/Wiki
Wikimedia ChilenonprofitROR ID
Obstech (Chile)companyROR ID
Inria ChilefacilityROR ID
Roche (Chile)companyROR IDWikidata/Wiki
Centro de Investigación de Polímeros AvanzadosfacilityROR ID
Empresa de Transportes Rurales SpAcompanyROR ID
OptimocompanyROR ID
CBBcompanyROR ID
Alfred H. Knight (Chile)companyROR ID
CMPC (Chile)companyROR ID
CollahuasicompanyROR ID

6. Frequently Asked Questions

How long does the review process normally take?

Review timelines depend on the volume of applications and whether your proposal qualifies for expedited review. On average, a standard review by an ethics board in Chile takes between 4 to 8 weeks.

Can we use digital signatures for informed consent?

Yes, digital consent forms are increasingly accepted, provided the platform used is secure, authenticates the identity of the signer, and complies with local regulations such as the eIDAS or ESIGN Act, depending on country-specific rules.

Regulatory Context

CountryChile (CL)
Ethics BoardComité de Ética Científico (CEC)
Primary LegislationLaw 20.120 on Scientific Research on Human Beings
Privacy RegulationLaw 19.628 on the Protection of Private Life
Study DesignMixed-Methods Study Design
Reporting StandardGRAMMS framework

Verified Funding Bodies

Funder registries and DOI configurations verified for compliance in Chile via Crossref.

  • Institut chilien de l'AntarctiqueID: 501100015634 | Location: Chile
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloID: 501100020884 | Location: Chile
  • New Mexico Chile AssociationID: 100020535 | Location: United States
  • Fulbright ChileID: 100012821 | Location: Chile
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e InnovaciónID: 100020266 | Location: Chile
  • Universidad de ChileID: 501100005853 | Location: Chile
  • Universidad Austral de ChileID: 501100009833 | Location: Chile
  • Pacific Hydro ChileID: 501100010734 | Location: Chile
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileID: 501100009610 | Location: Chile
  • Comité Mixto ESO-Gobierno de ChileID: 501100012499 | Location: Chile

Pre-Submission Warning

Do not recruit participants or initiate study procedures before receiving official written approval from your reviewing board. Ethical approvals cannot be granted retrospectively under Law 20.120 on Scientific Research on Human Beings.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo
  • Crossref logo

View CASRAI adoption →