Explainer · Plain-language

What is epistemology?

Epistemology is the theory of knowledge: the branch of philosophy that asks what counts as valid knowledge and how we come to know it. In research it shapes how you justify claims.

CASRAI plain-language explainers — clear answers to recurring research-administration questions

The step most authors miss

Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.

A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.

Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.

Epistemology in research

In research methodology, epistemology answers a practical question: how can the researcher know reality, and what relationship exists between the knower and what is known? A positivist epistemology treats knowledge as objective and observer-independent, won through measurement and replication. A constructivist or interpretivist epistemology treats knowledge as built through interpretation and shared meaning. Your epistemological stance is not abstract decoration — it justifies why a randomised trial or an in-depth interview counts as credible evidence for your question, and it shapes how you defend your conclusions to reviewers.

Epistemology and ontology

Epistemology is usually paired with ontology, the theory of what exists. Ontology asks what reality is; epistemology asks how we can know it. The two are linked: if you assume a single objective reality (a realist ontology), you tend toward an epistemology that prizes detached measurement. If you assume reality is socially constructed, you tend toward an epistemology that values participants’ meanings. Together, ontology and epistemology form the philosophical core of a research paradigm, which in turn guides methodology and method.

Why it matters for method

Making your epistemology explicit strengthens a study’s internal coherence and its E-E-A-T as scholarship. Examiners and peer reviewers expect alignment: a stated interpretivist epistemology paired with a purely statistical, hypothesis-testing design signals a confused rationale. Naming your position early lets you defend sampling, data collection and analysis as a consistent whole, and helps readers judge the trustworthiness and transferability of your findings.

Key facts

At a glance

Definition: the philosophical theory of knowledge — what we can know and how
Field: core branch of philosophy, alongside ontology and ethics
Core question: what counts as valid knowledge, and how is it justified?
In research: sets which evidence and methods are treated as credible
Paired with: ontology (what exists) within a research paradigm
Positions: positivist, interpretivist/constructivist, pragmatist, critical

Common misconceptions

What people often get wrong

Often heard: Epistemology and ontology are just two words for the same thing.

Actually: They are distinct. Ontology asks what exists and what the nature of reality is; epistemology asks how we can know it and what counts as valid knowledge. A paradigm combines both.

Often heard: Epistemology is abstract philosophy with no bearing on how a study is actually done.

Actually: Your epistemological position directly shapes which methods, samples and forms of evidence you treat as legitimate, and it is what you use to justify your design to reviewers.

Often heard: There is only one correct epistemology, so researchers do not really need to state theirs.

Actually: Several defensible positions coexist — positivist, interpretivist, pragmatist, critical. Stating yours explicitly is what gives a study philosophical coherence and credibility.

Going deeper