Explainer · Plain-language

What Is Epistemology? Definition, Types & Research Implications | CASRAI

Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge — what we can know, how we come to know it, and what justifies a knowledge claim. In research, an epistemological position shapes what kind of evidence a study produces and how that evidence should be interpreted.

CASRAI plain-language explainers — clear answers to recurring research-administration questions

The step most authors miss

Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.

A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.

Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.

What epistemology asks

Epistemological questions include: Is there an objective reality that research can reveal, or is reality constructed through the observer's perspective? Can the researcher remain separate from what is being studied, or is the relationship between knower and known always interactive? What kinds of evidence justify a knowledge claim — numbers and generalisable statistical patterns, or rich contextual descriptions of particular cases? These are not merely abstract philosophical puzzles; they determine what counts as a valid study in a given discipline and underpin the methodological choices researchers make.

Key epistemological positions

Positivism holds that knowledge derives from observable, measurable facts that exist independently of the researcher. Social reality, like natural reality, can be studied objectively using quantitative methods and deductive reasoning. Interpretivism (also called constructivism at the epistemological level) holds that social phenomena are inherently meaningful and that understanding requires interpreting the meanings that actors attach to their actions — a task requiring qualitative, inductive approaches. Pragmatism treats knowledge as a tool: truth is what works in practice, which justifies mixing methods to answer real-world questions. Critical realism, associated with Roy Bhaskar, distinguishes the real domain (generative mechanisms), the actual domain (events), and the empirical domain (experiences), arguing that science should explain mechanisms even when they cannot be directly observed.

Epistemology and research design

A positivist epistemology supports quantitative research — randomised controlled trials, surveys, statistical analysis — and aims for generalisable, replicable findings. An interpretivist epistemology supports qualitative research — interviews, ethnography, thematic analysis — and aims for depth, context, and transferable understanding. Pragmatism licenses mixed-methods research, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to address complex questions. Awareness of epistemological position helps researchers justify methodological choices, defend the kinds of claims their study can make, and engage productively with reviewers and examiners who may operate from different assumptions.

Epistemology vs ontology

Ontology asks what exists — the nature of reality. Epistemology asks how we can know what exists — the nature of knowledge. The two are tightly linked: if you believe (ontologically) that social reality is objective and independent of observers (realism), it follows (epistemologically) that it can be studied objectively. If you believe that reality is socially constructed (constructivist ontology), then knowledge must be produced through interpretation rather than observation alone. In practice, researchers' ontological and epistemological commitments form a coherent package that shapes their overall research paradigm.

Key facts

At a glance

Definition: The philosophical study of the nature and limits of knowledge
Core question: What can we know, how do we know it, and what justifies a knowledge claim?
Positivism: Knowledge is objective, observable, measurable, researcher-independent
Interpretivism: Knowledge is subjective, constructed through meaning and interpretation
Pragmatism: Knowledge is what is useful; justifies mixed-methods research
Critical realism: Distinguishes real mechanisms from observable events

Common misconceptions

What people often get wrong

Often heard: Epistemology is just abstract philosophy with no relevance to research practice.

Actually: No — epistemological position directly determines what counts as valid evidence in a study, which methods are appropriate, and what kinds of claims a researcher can legitimately make. Examiners and reviewers assess this alignment explicitly.

Often heard: Positivism is the only valid scientific epistemology.

Actually: No — different disciplines and research questions call for different epistemological approaches. Interpretivism is well-established in social sciences, humanities, and qualitative health research, producing rigorous knowledge of a different kind from positivist quantitative research.

Often heard: Epistemology and ontology mean the same thing.

Actually: No — ontology asks what exists (the nature of reality); epistemology asks how we can know what exists (the nature of knowledge). They are related but distinct philosophical positions that together constitute a research paradigm.

Going deeper