Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAI

Direct comparison

Qr Funding Vs Project Grants: Key Differences & Comparison | CASRAI

QR (quality-related) funding and project grants are the two streams of the UK's dual-support system. QR is unhypothecated block funding allocated on REF results; project grants are competitive awards for specific research from research councils and charities.

A side-by-side comparison of two research-administration standards

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionQR fundingProject grants
SourceUK funding bodies (e.g. Research England) — the funding-body armResearch councils (UKRI), charities and other funders
Basis of allocationAllocated by formula on REF quality and volume profilesCompetitive — awarded on the merit of a specific proposal
What it fundsWhatever the institution prioritises within researchA specific, proposed project with defined aims
FlexibilityUnhypothecated — institution decides how to spend itRestricted to the funded project and its budget
Time horizonOngoing, recurrent block funding between REF cyclesFixed-term, tied to the project duration
Role in dual supportThe block-grant half — stability and strategic capacityThe competitive half — targeted, project-specific support
AccountabilityAccountable via REF performance and institutional governanceAccountable via grant conditions, reporting and outputs
ExamplesResearch England QR allocations to English universitiesA UKRI research-council grant or a charity research award

Common questions

FAQ

What is the UK dual-support system?+

It is the principle that UK universities receive research funding through two complementary routes: block-grant QR funding allocated by the funding bodies on the basis of REF results, and competitive project grants awarded by research councils and other funders. The aim is to combine a stable, flexible institutional base with targeted, peer-reviewed support for specific work.

Why is QR funding called "unhypothecated"?+

Because it is not tied to a specified purpose. Unlike a project grant, which must be spent on the funded project, QR funding can be directed by the institution towards its own priorities — supporting early-career researchers, seed-funding new ideas, or maintaining infrastructure — which gives universities strategic flexibility.

Does the REF directly award grants to researchers?+

No — the REF assesses research quality and produces profiles that funding bodies use to allocate QR block funding to institutions, not to individuals or specific projects. Competitive grants to researchers come separately from research councils and charities through their own application processes.

LAC

Partner Deal

LAC Health Supplies Mobile App

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo
  • Crossref logo

View CASRAI adoption →