Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAI

Direct comparison

Rae Vs Ref: Key Differences & Comparison | CASRAI

The RAE and the REF are the UK's successive national research-assessment exercises. The RAE ran from 1986 to 2008; the REF replaced it from 2014, introducing the formal assessment of research impact as its headline change.

A side-by-side comparison of two research-administration standards

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionRAEREF
PeriodRan 1986–2008 (several rounds; last exercise 2008)From 2014 — REF 2014, REF 2021, next REF 2029
Full nameResearch Assessment ExerciseResearch Excellence Framework
Name-change rationaleThe established model up to 2008Renamed in 2014 to signal a broadened, impact-inclusive scope
Impact assessed?No formal Impact elementYes — Impact introduced as a weighted element in REF 2014
Metrics usePrimarily expert peer review of outputsPeer review led; metrics used as informative, not decisive
Peer-review basisSubject panels reviewing submitted researchExpert sub-panels reviewing Units of Assessment
Assessment elementsCentred on research outputs and environment indicatorsOutputs, Impact, and Environment (60/25/15 in REF 2021)
Star ratingsIntroduced a star-style quality profile in RAE 2008Continued the 4*/3*/2*/1*/unclassified quality scale
FrequencyPeriodic rounds over more than two decadesPeriodic cycles (2014, 2021, 2029)

Common questions

FAQ

When did the RAE become the REF?+

The Research Assessment Exercise last ran in 2008, and the Research Excellence Framework first ran in 2014, replacing it. The change of name in 2014 reflected a change of substance — most notably the addition of a formal Impact element to the assessment.

What was the biggest difference the REF introduced?+

The headline addition was Impact: the REF formally assesses the demonstrable effects of research beyond academia — on the economy, society, policy, culture, health, or the environment — through impact case studies. The RAE had not assessed impact in this structured, weighted way, so its introduction in REF 2014 was the defining change.

Do both exercises rely on peer review?+

Yes — both the RAE and the REF are fundamentally based on expert peer review, with academics and (in the REF) research users assessing submissions organised into subject-based units. Metrics inform the REF but do not replace the panel-based judgement at its core.

LAC

Partner Deal

LAC Health Supplies Mobile App

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo
  • Crossref logo

View CASRAI adoption →