Explainer · Plain-language

Reporting Guideline: Definition, Meaning & Examples | CASRAI

A reporting guideline is a structured tool — usually a checklist, and often accompanied by a flow diagram — that specifies the minimum information researchers should include when describing a particular type of study. Reporting guidelines exist for many study designs, from randomised controlled trials to systematic reviews and case reports, and they aim to make published research transparent, complete, and usable. They are catalogued by the EQUATOR Network and are increasingly required by journals. A reporting guideline concerns how a study is described, not how it should be designed or conducted.

CASRAI plain-language explainers — clear answers to recurring research-administration questions

The short answer

A reporting guideline is an evidence-informed set of items — typically a checklist — that tells authors the minimum content needed to report a given study type transparently and completely. Different designs have their own guidelines: CONSORT for randomised controlled trials, PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, STROBE for observational studies, ARRIVE for animal research, SPIRIT for trial protocols, TRIPOD for prediction-model studies, and CARE for case reports, among others. These guidelines are collected and indexed by the EQUATOR Network, and many journals now require authors to follow the relevant one and submit a completed checklist. A reporting guideline is distinct from a methodological standard: it governs how the study is described, not how it must be carried out.

The step most authors miss

Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.

A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.

Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.

What a reporting guideline is

A reporting guideline is a structured aid — most often a checklist of items, sometimes with an accompanying flow diagram — that defines the minimum set of information needed to report a particular kind of study clearly and completely. The aim is to ensure that readers can understand exactly what was done and what was found, and can appraise, replicate, or build on the work. Reporting guidelines are typically developed by expert groups through a consensus process and are periodically updated as practice evolves. They are written for authors but also serve peer reviewers and editors as a benchmark for assessing a manuscript's completeness.

Guidelines for different study types

Because study designs differ, reporting guidelines are design-specific. CONSORT applies to randomised controlled trials and includes a participant flow diagram. PRISMA covers systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with its own flow diagram for the selection of studies. STROBE addresses observational studies such as cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional designs. ARRIVE concerns research involving animals. SPIRIT addresses the content of clinical trial protocols, complementing CONSORT for the eventual report. TRIPOD covers studies developing or validating prediction models, and CARE addresses case reports. Many guidelines also have extensions tailored to particular contexts or sub-designs, so authors should select the core guideline that matches their study and then any applicable extension.

The EQUATOR Network and journal requirements

The EQUATOR Network maintains a comprehensive, searchable library of reporting guidelines, acting as the central registry where authors can find the appropriate guideline for their study type. This makes it straightforward to locate, for example, the current version of CONSORT or PRISMA along with relevant extensions. An increasing number of journals require authors to follow the relevant reporting guideline and to submit a completed checklist indicating where each item is addressed. This integration into editorial policy is a major driver of guideline adoption and of better reporting across the literature.

Reporting guideline versus methodological standard

It is important to distinguish a reporting guideline from a methodological standard. A reporting guideline concerns how a study should be described in a manuscript — what information must be disclosed so the work is transparent and interpretable. It does not dictate how the study should be designed or conducted. A methodological standard, by contrast, addresses the conduct of research — how a trial should be randomised or a review searched, for example. A well-reported study following CONSORT could still have methodological weaknesses; conversely, a methodologically strong study could be reported poorly. Reporting guidelines target the transparency of the account, which is why they are framed around minimum reporting items rather than prescriptive methods.

Key facts

At a glance

Definition: A checklist specifying minimum information for reporting a study type
Examples: CONSORT (RCTs), PRISMA (systematic reviews), STROBE (observational), ARRIVE (animal), SPIRIT (protocols), TRIPOD (prediction models), CARE (case reports)
Registry: Catalogued by the EQUATOR Network
Adoption: Increasingly required by journals, often with a completed checklist
Scope: Governs reporting (description), not study design or conduct
Purpose: Transparency, completeness, and reduction of research waste

Common misconceptions

What people often get wrong

Often heard: A reporting guideline tells you how to design and run your study.

Actually: No — a reporting guideline concerns how to describe a completed study transparently. It is distinct from a methodological standard, which addresses how the research is conducted.

Often heard: One guideline fits all studies.

Actually: No — reporting guidelines are design-specific. A randomised trial uses CONSORT, a systematic review uses PRISMA, an observational study uses STROBE, and so on; the right one depends on the study type.

Often heard: Following a reporting guideline guarantees the research is high quality.

Actually: No — a guideline improves the transparency of reporting, not the underlying methodology. A study can be reported completely yet still have methodological limitations.

Going deeper