Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAI

Definition · Plain-language

General-purpose AI (GPAI)

GPAI stands for general-purpose AI — models capable of competently performing a wide range of distinct tasks and being integrated into many downstream systems.

CASRAI research-methods explainer — General-purpose AI (GPAI)

The step most authors miss

Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.

A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.

Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.

What general-purpose AI means

A general-purpose AI model is one that displays significant generality and can competently perform a wide range of distinct tasks, regardless of how it is placed on the market, and that can be integrated into a variety of downstream systems or applications. Large language models that power chatbots, coding assistants and content generators are the most familiar examples. The EU AI Act treats GPAI models as a distinct category because a single model can be reused across countless products, so obligations attach at the model level rather than only to each end-use application.

Obligations under the EU AI Act

Under the Act, providers of GPAI models must prepare and keep up to date technical documentation, provide information to downstream providers who integrate the model, put in place a policy to respect EU copyright law, and publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used for training. These transparency and documentation duties aim to give regulators and downstream developers visibility into how a model was built. The obligations for GPAI models began to apply from August 2025, with the European AI Office overseeing them.

Systemic-risk GPAI

The Act creates a stricter sub-category for GPAI models that pose systemic risk — broadly, the most capable models whose reach could have significant effects across the market or society. Providers of these models face additional obligations, which can include model evaluations, adversarial testing, assessing and mitigating systemic risks, ensuring cybersecurity and reporting serious incidents. A voluntary GPAI Code of Practice, published in 2025, was developed to help providers demonstrate compliance with these duties ahead of harmonised standards.

Key facts

At a glance

  • Definition: AI models with broad generality, usable across many tasks and systems.
  • Stands for: General-Purpose AI.
  • Examples: Large language and multimodal foundation models.
  • Core duties: Technical documentation, downstream information, training-data summary.
  • Systemic risk: Extra duties for the most capable models (evaluation, incident reporting).
  • Applies from: August 2025 under the EU AI Act, overseen by the AI Office.

Common misconceptions

What people often get wrong

Often heard: GPAI and high-risk AI systems are the same regulatory category.

Actually: They are distinct. GPAI rules apply to general-purpose models themselves; the high-risk regime applies to specific AI systems used in sensitive domains. A GPAI model and a high-risk system are governed by separate sets of obligations.

Often heard: All GPAI models face the same obligations under the EU AI Act.

Actually: The Act distinguishes ordinary GPAI models from those posing systemic risk. The latter, broadly the most capable models, carry additional duties such as model evaluation, risk mitigation and serious-incident reporting.

Often heard: The GPAI Code of Practice is legally binding on providers.

Actually: The Code of Practice is a voluntary instrument designed to help providers demonstrate compliance. Adherence is one way to show conformity, but the binding obligations come from the Regulation itself.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo
  • Crossref logo

View CASRAI adoption →