Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAI

Clinical research & EBM · Reference

What is a forest plot?

A forest plot is a graph that displays the effect estimate and confidence interval from each study in a meta-analysis, alongside the pooled result. Each study is a square with a horizontal line; the combined estimate is the diamond at the foot of the plot.

Anatomy of the plot

Each row of a forest plot represents one study. A marker — usually a square — sits at that study’s effect estimate, such as a hazard ratio or relative risk, and a horizontal line through it shows the confidence interval. The size of the square reflects the study’s weight in the analysis, so larger, more precise studies draw the eye. A vertical line of no effect runs down the plot (at 1 for ratio measures, 0 for differences); a confidence interval that crosses it indicates a result not statistically significant at the chosen level.

The diamond and the pooled estimate

At the foot of the plot sits the diamond, which represents the pooled estimate combining all the studies. Its centre marks the combined effect and its width shows the confidence interval of that pooled result. Because the diamond aggregates many studies, it is usually narrower — more precise — than any single study’s line. Where the diamond falls relative to the line of no effect summarises the meta-analysis: clearly to one side suggests a consistent effect, while a diamond straddling the line suggests the combined evidence is inconclusive.

Reading heterogeneity

A forest plot also reveals heterogeneity — how much the studies disagree. If the study markers line up and their intervals overlap, the effect looks consistent; if they scatter widely, the studies may be measuring different things or differ in design and population. This visual impression is usually accompanied by statistics such as I², which quantifies the proportion of variation due to genuine differences rather than chance. Forest plots are a standard feature of systematic reviews and are produced to the reporting standards set out by PRISMA.

Key facts

At a glance

  • Definition: Graph of study estimates in a meta-analysis
  • Each study: A square marker with a confidence-interval line
  • Square size: Reflects the study’s weight in the analysis
  • The diamond: The pooled estimate combining all studies
  • Line of no effect: At 1 (ratios) or 0 (differences)
  • Also shows: Heterogeneity between studies

Common questions

FAQ

What does the diamond on a forest plot mean?+

The diamond represents the pooled estimate that combines all the studies in the meta-analysis. Its centre marks the combined effect and its width is the confidence interval of that pooled result, which is usually narrower than any single study because it aggregates the evidence.

What does it mean if a study’s line crosses the line of no effect?+

The vertical line of no effect sits at 1 for ratio measures or 0 for differences. If a study’s confidence-interval line crosses it, the result is not statistically significant at the chosen level, because the interval includes the value that means no difference between groups.

How does a forest plot show heterogeneity?+

When the study markers line up and their confidence intervals overlap, the effect looks consistent; when they scatter widely, the studies disagree. This visual impression is usually paired with a statistic such as I², which quantifies how much of the variation reflects genuine differences rather than chance.

The step most authors miss

Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.

A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.

Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoCrossref logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo
  • Crossref logo

View CASRAI adoption →