Direct comparison
CC BY vs. CC BY-SA: Key Differences
CC BY and CC BY-SA both permit commercial reuse with attribution. CC BY-SA adds a ShareAlike clause requiring derivatives to use the same license.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · free to try
Ask about CC BY vs. CC BY-SA: Key Differences
Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.
An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.
Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do CC BY, CC BY-SA compare side by side?
The table below compares CC BY, CC BY-SA across 11 procurement-relevant dimensions, from full name through license version in current use.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | CC BY | CC BY-SA |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Attribution | Attribution-ShareAlike |
| License elements | BY only | BY + SA |
| Attribution required | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial reuse allowed | Yes | Yes |
| Derivative works allowed | Yes, no restriction on how they're licensed | Yes, but must carry the same or a ShareAlike-compatible license |
| "Copyleft"-style condition | No | Yes — openness propagates to derivatives |
| Can a derivative be relicensed more restrictively? | Yes | No |
| Mixing with differently-licensed material | Straightforward — no downstream license constraint | Can be legally awkward — combined derivative must satisfy the SA condition |
| Typical research use | Journal articles; the default under most funder OA mandates | Educational/reference material, wikis, some datasets where continued openness is a priority |
| Plan S (cOAlition S) status | Default requirement for funded outputs | Named acceptable alternative to CC BY |
| License version in current use | 4.0 (Nov 2013), recommended for new works | 4.0 (Nov 2013), recommended for new works |
Common questions
Common questions about CC BY vs CC BY-SA
Can I convert a CC BY-SA work into a CC BY one?
+
No. The ShareAlike condition is binding on anyone creating a derivative — you cannot strip it out by relicensing. Only the original rights holder can choose to additionally release the work under a different license.
Does CC BY-SA restrict commercial use?
+
No. Both CC BY and CC BY-SA allow commercial reuse; commercial restriction is a separate license element (NC) that neither license includes.
Why do funder open-access mandates default to CC BY instead of CC BY-SA?
+
CC BY imposes the fewest downstream constraints, which maximizes reuse and text/data-mining compatibility — a priority for funders like cOAlition S. CC BY-SA remains an accepted alternative under Plan S, but CC BY is the default.
Is CC BY-SA compatible with other ShareAlike licenses?
+
Sometimes — Creative Commons maintains a compatibility list of other ShareAlike-style licenses that adaptations of CC BY-SA material may use instead of CC BY-SA itself. Compatibility isn't automatic between arbitrary licenses; it applies only to licenses Creative Commons has explicitly designated as compatible.
Going deeper
