Overview
Where AAAS stands on CRediT
Per AAAS’s own Science Journals editorial-policies page: "Science journals encourage all authors to state their contribution to the study in the acknowledgments section following the CRediT model; this information will be published in the paper." This is an encouragement, not a mandatory structured-statement requirement — the prior "Native"/required framing on this page was not supported by the primary source and has been corrected.
Scope: Encouraged across the Science family; not a mandatory submission requirement
Implementation details
How CRediT is captured and produced
| Submission system | Custom (Science manuscript system) |
| JATS implementation | Not independently confirmed as structured JATS <role> capture. AAAS’s own editorial-policies page asks authors to state contributions in the acknowledgments section "following the CRediT model" — a narrative use of the taxonomy rather than a confirmed structured-metadata pipeline. |
| Production workflow | Not independently confirmed. AAAS’s own policy describes a narrative, acknowledgments-section use of the CRediT model rather than a documented structured-JATS/Crossref-deposit pipeline; CASRAI found no primary source confirming machine-readable CRediT metadata for Science-family articles. |
For authors
Author guidance — submitting to a AAAS journal
When submitting to a Science-family journal, you may voluntarily describe each contributor’s role using the CRediT taxonomy in the acknowledgments section. It is encouraged but, per AAAS’s own policy page, not currently presented as a mandatory per-author structured role matrix.
For general CRediT submission guidance across publishers, see CRediT for authors.
Sample journals
Representative AAAS titles with CRediT capture
- Science
- Science Advances
- Science Translational Medicine
- Science Robotics
- Science Signaling
- Science Immunology
Adoption history
Notable milestones
Corrected 2026-07-16: AAAS’s own Science Journals editorial-policies page states the CRediT model is "encouraged," not required, for the acknowledgments-section contribution statement. An earlier version of this page described this as mandatory, portfolio-wide "Native" adoption from 2021, which was not traceable to any AAAS primary source.
Notes
Caveats and context
Science journals separately require an ICMJE-style authorship declaration; the CRediT-model contribution note is an encouraged acknowledgments-section addition, not a confirmed structured-capture requirement.
Frequently asked
Common questions about AAAS and CRediT
- Does AAAS require CRediT contributor statements?
- AAAS supports CRediT but does not require it across the whole portfolio. Per AAAS’s own Science Journals editorial-policies page: "Science journals encourage all authors to state their contribution to the study in the acknowledgments section following the CRediT model; this information will be published in the paper." This is an encouragement, not a mandatory structured-statement requirement — the prior "Native"/required framing on this page was not supported by the primary source and has been corrected. Many titles encourage structured capture without mandating it.
- Which AAAS journals support CRediT?
- Representative AAAS titles known to support structured CRediT capture include Science, Science Advances, Science Translational Medicine. Scope: Encouraged across the Science family; not a mandatory submission requirement. Check the individual journals author instructions to confirm the current contributor-roles policy.
- How do I add CRediT to my AAAS submission?
- When submitting to a Science-family journal, you may voluntarily describe each contributor’s role using the CRediT taxonomy in the acknowledgments section. It is encouraged but, per AAAS’s own policy page, not currently presented as a mandatory per-author structured role matrix.
- What submission system does AAAS use for CRediT capture?
- AAAS uses Custom (Science manuscript system). Not independently confirmed as structured JATS <role> capture. AAAS’s own editorial-policies page asks authors to state contributions in the acknowledgments section "following the CRediT model" — a narrative use of the taxonomy rather than a confirmed structured-metadata pipeline.
- When did AAAS adopt CRediT?
- AAAS has not made a single portfolio-wide CRediT-adoption announcement; coverage has expanded steadily on a per-journal basis. Corrected 2026-07-16: AAAS’s own Science Journals editorial-policies page states the CRediT model is "encouraged," not required, for the acknowledgments-section contribution statement. An earlier version of this page described this as mandatory, portfolio-wide "Native" adoption from 2021, which was not traceable to any AAAS primary source.
References
Sources
- Science Journals: Editorial Policies (science.org) — "Science journals encourage all authors to state their contribution... following the CRediT model"
- Holcombe (2019) Publications — CRediT adoption review







