Definition · Plain-language
Metadata management
Metadata management is the discipline of managing the data that describes data — its definitions, structure, lineage, ownership and quality — so that information assets are consistent, discoverable and trustworthy.
The step most authors miss
Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.
A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.
Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.
What counts as metadata
Metadata is descriptive information about a data asset. Practitioners usually distinguish business metadata (definitions, ownership, business rules and glossary terms), technical metadata (schemas, data types, table and column structures) and operational metadata (lineage, processing jobs, refresh times and quality results). Managing this metadata means capturing it once, keeping it current and making it usable. In an enterprise setting this differs in emphasis from scholarly metadata, which describes research outputs for discovery and citation; here the focus is on operational data assets across business systems.
Why it matters for governance
Governance decisions are only as good as the metadata that supports them. To classify data by sensitivity, assess its quality, or trace where it flows, you first need accurate, well-organised metadata. Metadata management therefore underpins the data dictionary, the data catalogue and data lineage. It lets the organisation answer essential questions consistently: what does this field mean, who owns it, where did it come from and how reliable is it. Without managed metadata, those answers vary by team and erode trust in the data.
How it is implemented
Organisations implement metadata management through a metadata repository or catalogue that harvests metadata from source systems, supplemented by curated business glossaries maintained by data stewards. Increasingly, tools automate the capture of technical and operational metadata, while business definitions are added and approved through governance workflows. The aim is a single, authoritative description of each data asset that supports search, impact analysis and compliance reporting, rather than scattered, inconsistent documentation in spreadsheets.
Key facts
At a glance
- Definition: managing the data that describes data
- Types: business, technical and operational metadata
- Supports: data dictionaries, catalogues and lineage
- Maintained by: data stewards and automated harvesting tools
- Goal: consistent, discoverable, trusted data assets
- Related standard: ISO/IEC 11179 metadata registries
Common misconceptions
What people often get wrong
Often heard: Metadata management is just keeping a list of file names and field names.
Actually: It covers far more: definitions, ownership, business rules, lineage and quality. A simple field list omits the meaning and provenance that make data usable and governable.
Often heard: Metadata management is the same as the scholarly metadata used to cite research papers.
Actually: They share principles but differ in scope. Scholarly metadata describes research outputs for discovery and citation; enterprise metadata management describes operational data assets across business systems.
Often heard: Once metadata is captured, the job is done.
Actually: Metadata must be kept current as systems change. Stale definitions and outdated lineage mislead users, so metadata management is an ongoing, governed process rather than a one-off exercise.
Going deeper
