Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Discipline guide · Epidemiology

Contributor roles in epidemiology

Contributor roles for observational, cohort and case-control studies. Aligned with the STROBE checklist and the increasingly standard requirement for pre-registration of analysis plans.

Why this discipline needs its own guide

Background

Epidemiology sits between the structured trials world and the more interpretive social-science world. A typical observational study involves a small core team that defines the exposure and outcome variables, a larger team that curates and harmonises data from registries or biobanks, a statistician (often shared across studies) and clinical-discipline experts who anchor the substantive interpretation. CRediT maps reasonably onto that structure provided Data Curation is recognised as the substantive role it is.

Reporting against the STROBE checklist (or its disease-specific variants such as RECORD for routinely collected health data) supplements but does not replace the contributor statement. Pre-registration of the analysis plan on the Open Science Framework or in a journal-specific Registered Report is increasingly expected and is recorded under Methodology.

Key considerations

How to assign the roles

  • Data Curation in epidemiology is substantial: harmonising variables across cohorts, defining inclusion windows, deriving phenotypes from coded health-record data. Name the contributors who did this work.
  • Linkage of routine health-record datasets carries governance obligations that are themselves a Methodology contribution, not just a Resources one.
  • Sensitivity analyses, multiple-imputation schemes and instrumental-variable approaches are Formal Analysis. Where these were pre-specified versus post-hoc, the manuscript should state so but the CRediT role does not change.
  • Cohort principal investigators who provide access to the underlying data without further intellectual contribution belong under Resources, not Investigation.
  • For meta-analyses, the protocol registration (PROSPERO) and the search strategy belong under Methodology; screening and extraction are Investigation; analysis is Formal Analysis.

Worked example

A representative CRediT statement

Paste-ready Author Contributions paragraph
text
Author Contributions (CRediT)

S. Kowalski: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.
R. Mehta: Methodology, Data curation, Software.
M. Ndiaye: Data curation, Investigation.
J. Park: Formal analysis, Visualization.
A. Bianchi: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Pre-registered analysis plan: OSF osf.io/XXXXX.

The role names above match the canonical wording at casrai.org/credit. Most publishers accept exactly this format.

Further reading

Discipline-specific sources

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →