CBCP (CASRAI)
Clinical Research Billing & Coverage Analysis Certification — Professional
What you earn
The credential itself
Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal CBCP (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.
CASRAI Certification
Certificate of Professional Competence
This is to certify that
Dr. Amelia R. Hartley
has completed the prescribed programme of study and passed the examination in
Clinical Research Billing & Coverage Analysis — Professional
and is admitted to the designationCBCP (CASRAI)
Certifications

CBCP (CASRAI) — Clinical Research Billing & Coverage Analysis, Professional
CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-CBC-2026-WXZO3S
casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-CBC-2026-WXZO3S
Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.
It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.
About this credential
What it covers
Body of knowledge
Exam blueprint
The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.
| Domain | Proportion of exam | Weight | Items |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal and regulatory architecture of clinical research billing1 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| The qualifying clinical trial determination2 | 14%≈ 10 items | ≈ 10 | |
| Routine costs, exclusions, and the research-versus-standard-of-care determination3 | 16%≈ 11 items | ≈ 11 | |
| Device trials, investigational device exemption categories, and other coverage pathways4 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| Building the coverage analysis and the billing grid5 | 16%≈ 11 items | ≈ 11 | |
| Claim execution: identification, charge routing, and the encounter6 | 16%≈ 11 items | ≈ 11 | |
| Payers other than traditional Medicare7 | 8%≈ 6 items | ≈ 6 | |
| Monitoring, reconciliation, audit, and enforcement exposure8 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| Total | 100% | 71 |
Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.
Syllabus
12 modules, 12 lessons
Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.
12 modules · 12 lessons · 100 h
Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.
Module 1
1
1 lesson · 6 h
- Locked.Why research billing is a distinct discipline; the authority hierarchy6 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 1.1 Explain to a non-specialist why an ordinary billing process produces wrong answers on research encounters.
- 1.2 Classify a given obligation by its source — statute, regulation, national coverage determination, local coverage determination, manual instruction, transmittal, payer policy, institutional policy — and rank the sources.
- 1.3 Distinguish the coverage, coding, payment and documentation questions and route each correctly.
- 1.4 Locate the current version of a governing instrument and verify it is current before relying on it.
- 1.5 State the False Claims Act knowledge standard and explain why competence, not good faith, is the operative protection.
- 1.6 Identify the point at which a question belongs to counsel.
Module 2
2
1 lesson · 10 h
- Locked.The qualifying clinical trial determination10 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 2.1 Apply the Medicare Clinical Trial Policy's stated requirements to a study's actual documents and reach a determination.
- 2.2 Apply the deemed status categories and identify the documentary evidence each requires.
- 2.3 Distinguish a deemed study from one requiring direct assessment.
- 2.4 State the consequence of a negative determination.
- 2.5 Document the determination so it can be reproduced years later.
- 2.6 Re-determine on a triggering change.
- 2.7 Identify a marginal case and escalate it.
Module 3
3
1 lesson · 12 h
- Locked.Routine costs and the three exclusions12 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 3.1 Apply the routine costs definition to an item and reach a determination.
- 3.2 Distinguish the three exclusions from one another and apply each on its own terms.
- 3.3 Apply the "used in the direct clinical management of the patient" test.
- 3.4 Determine the treatment of items required solely for the provision of the investigational item, and of items for monitoring effects and preventing complications.
- 3.5 Determine the treatment of care for complications arising from the investigational item.
- 3.6 Document each determination with its basis.
Module 4
4
1 lesson · 12 h
- Locked.The research-versus-standard-of-care determination12 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 4.1 Establish a documented standard of care for a given clinical situation from citable sources, without forming a clinical opinion.
- 4.2 Determine whether a protocol-required item is standard of care, and at what frequency.
- 4.3 Handle protocol-driven over-frequency by splitting standard-of-care instances from excess instances.
- 4.4 Determine the position of an item that is standard of care generally but not for this indication, or not medically necessary on these facts.
- 4.5 Analyse screening and eligibility procedures, including overlap with diagnostic activity that would have occurred anyway.
- 4.6 Recognise the limit of their own competence and route a genuinely clinical question to a clinician.
Module 5
5
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.Device trials, IDE categories, and coverage with evidence development8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 5.1 Determine whether a study involves a device under an investigational device exemption and identify its category.
- 5.2 State the coverage consequence of each category, distinguishing the device itself from routine care items and services.
- 5.3 Identify what must be in place before the first related claim and confirm it is.
- 5.4 Recognise a coverage-with-evidence-development study and apply its conditions.
- 5.5 Escalate a categorisation question rather than deciding it.
Module 6
6
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.The document set and the reconciled schedule of events8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 6.1 Assemble and verify the complete document set before beginning analysis.
- 6.2 Identify what is unknowable when a given document is missing, and decline to proceed.
- 6.3 Build a reconciled schedule of events for coverage purposes.
- 6.4 Resolve and document discrepancies between protocol table, protocol body, ancillary manuals and consent document.
- 6.5 Represent conditional, branching, unscheduled and optional-sub-study activity.
Module 7
7
1 lesson · 12 h
- Locked.Building the billing grid12 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 7.1 Produce a complete billing grid assigning each item at each visit to third-party payer, sponsor, or neither, with a documented basis per line.
- 7.2 Demonstrate that every line is assigned and no line is assigned twice.
- 7.3 Produce the grid in a form downstream systems can consume.
- 7.4 Version the grid and amend it on protocol amendment, including determining retrospective effect.
- 7.5 Defend any line in the grid to an auditor from the record alone.
Module 8
8
1 lesson · 6 h
- Locked.Three-document reconciliation: grid, budget, consent6 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 8.1 Reconcile the grid against the study budget and identify any payer-assigned line priced to the sponsor, and any unassigned line.
- 8.2 Reconcile the grid against the informed consent cost and billing language and identify contradictions.
- 8.3 Reconcile the grid against the clinical trial agreement, including its subject-injury provisions.
- 8.4 Escalate a contradiction to the correct owner — study team, contracts, IRB, or compliance — rather than resolving it unilaterally.
- 8.5 Sequence coverage analysis, budget and activation correctly.
Module 9
9
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.Claim execution I: identifying the research encounter and routing the charge8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 9.1 Design and verify a mechanism that identifies a research encounter at the point of service.
- 9.2 Configure and verify charge routing consistent with the grid.
- 9.3 Make and document an encounter-level research-versus-standard-of-care determination for unanticipated activity.
- 9.4 Handle unscheduled visits, emergency presentations and off-study encounters.
- 9.5 Test whether institutional systems are enforcing the grid or merely recording it.
Module 10
10
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.Claim execution II: claim identification requirements8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 10.1 Identify the modifier applicable to an investigational clinical service and the modifier applicable to a routine clinical service furnished in an approved clinical research study, and apply each correctly.
- 10.2 Identify the condition code identifying a qualifying clinical trial and the claim type on which it belongs.
- 10.3 Report the research diagnosis code correctly, including knowing that it may be either primary or secondary and is not required to be primary.
- 10.4 Report the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier in the correct field for the claim type.
- 10.5 Distinguish institutional from professional claim requirements for the same encounter.
- 10.6 Detect and correct claims missing required research identification, and claims carrying it wrongly.
- 10.7 Work with certified coding staff within the correct boundary.
- 10.8 Verify any coding requirement against the current source before relying on it.
Module 11
11
1 lesson · 6 h
- Locked.Payers other than traditional Medicare6 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 11.1 Determine a commercial plan's obligation under 42 U.S.C. 300gg-8 and identify when it does not apply.
- 11.2 Determine a Medicaid programme's obligation using the Medicaid definition, not the Medicare one.
- 11.3 Manage prior authorisation for research-associated services.
- 11.4 Analyse a denial and respond correctly.
- 11.5 Determine the position of a participant enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan.
- 11.6 Recognise and correct the unsupported assertion that sponsor payment creates Medicare Secondary Payer status.
Module 12
12
1 lesson · 4 h
- Locked.Monitoring, reconciliation, audit and enforcement exposure4 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- On completion the candidate can:
- 12.1 Design a prospective control rather than relying on detection.
- 12.2 Perform a post-billing review and quantify error.
- 12.3 Reconcile sponsor invoices, payer claims and the grid for a study.
- 12.4 Determine look-back scope for an identified systematic error.
- 12.5 Recognise the point at which correction becomes a disclosure question and route it to compliance and counsel.
- 12.6 Report research billing risk accurately to leadership.
Assessment
How the exam works
The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.
Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.
Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.
Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.
Certifying authority
Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD
CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.
CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.
What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.







