DCTP (CASRAI)
Decentralised & Digital Trials Certification — Professional
What you earn
The credential itself
Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal DCTP (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.
CASRAI Certification
Certificate of Professional Competence
This is to certify that
Dr. Amelia R. Hartley
has completed the prescribed programme of study and passed the examination in
Decentralised & Digital Trials — Professional
and is admitted to the designationDCTP (CASRAI)
Certifications

DCTP (CASRAI) — Decentralised & Digital Trials, Professional
CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-DCT-2026-8N9UTR
casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-DCT-2026-8N9UTR
Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.
It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.
About this credential
What it covers
Body of knowledge
Exam blueprint
The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.
| Domain | Proportion of exam | Weight | Items |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decentralisation concepts, the spectrum, and feasibility assessment1 | 10%≈ 8 items | ≈ 8 | |
| Regulatory framework for decentralised elements2 | 16%≈ 12 items | ≈ 12 | |
| Informed consent obtained remotely, and eConsent design3 | 12%≈ 9 items | ≈ 9 | |
| Remote visits, local healthcare settings, home nursing and mobile units4 | 12%≈ 9 items | ≈ 9 | |
| Direct-to-participant investigational product supply and accountability5 | 12%≈ 9 items | ≈ 9 | |
| Digital health technologies, digital endpoints and eCOA6 | 15%≈ 11 items | ≈ 11 | |
| Data flow, remote source access, and oversight architecture7 | 13%≈ 10 items | ≈ 10 | |
| Privacy, equity, jurisdiction and risk assessment8 | 10%≈ 8 items | ≈ 8 | |
| Total | 100% | 76 |
Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.
Syllabus
11 modules, 11 lessons
Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.
11 modules · 11 lessons
Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.
Module 1
M1
1 lesson
- Locked.What “decentralised” actually meansLocked
On completion you will be able to
- R State the ICH E6(R3) Annex 2 definition of decentralised elements and explain why it is framed around activities, not around trials.
- A Classify every trial-related activity in a supplied protocol as at, or outside, the investigator's location.
- A Distinguish decentralised elements, pragmatic elements and the incorporation of real-world data, and identify which are present in a design.
- A Place a design on the spectrum from fully site-based, through hybrid, to fully remote, and justify the placement.
- N Explain why "is this a DCT?" is the wrong question and what the right one is.
Module 2
M3
1 lesson
- Locked.Regulatory framework II: jurisdictions, and the protocol/IRB interfaceLocked
On completion you will be able to
- A State the EU framework (EU) and cite the EC recommendation paper correctly by title, date and publisher.
- A State the UK position (UK) including the amending instrument, its making date and its in-force date.
- N Distinguish decentralised trial conduct from decentralised manufacture of investigational medicinal products, and explain why the two are conflated.
- R Name the two final FDA guidances governing decentralised elements and remote data acquisition (US), with their status, dates and the drafts they finalise — and state honestly that their body text is not part of this curriculum's verified base.
- N Draft the protocol text describing and justifying a decentralised element, and decide what belongs in the protocol versus a protocol-related document.
- A Prepare the IRB/IEC-facing description of a decentralised methodology.
- A Recognise that pandemic-era national flexibilities were temporary and reason from the permanent framework.
Module 3
M4
1 lesson
- Locked.Informed consent obtained remotely, and eConsent designLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Design a consent process for a trial with decentralised elements and document the modalities in the protocol.
- A Specify how the investigator will assure themselves of the participant's identity when consent is taken remotely, and pre-specify the verification method and the privacy safeguards.
- N Assess whether a population's characteristics make a computerised consent process appropriate, and design the alternative pathway.
- A Draft the consent-material disclosure of what data are collected, how they may be used, and which parties will access the participant's personal information — including health records and home address.
- N Design multi-modal consent information that supports understanding rather than demonstrating production values.
- A Determine the consent or permission basis for secondary use of data and RWD in a given region.
Module 4
M5
1 lesson
- Locked.Remote visits, usual clinical practice and investigator oversightLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Design a visit schedule specifying, per visit and procedure, location and performer.
- N Determine the appropriate level of investigator oversight for a given activity and justify it against criticality and risk.
- A Classify a trial-related activity performed by a healthcare professional as requiring, or not requiring, knowledge of the protocol, investigator's brochure or trial-related documents — and apply the correct arrangements.
- A Specify the arrangements for activities not requiring protocol knowledge: how data are shared, how records are retained including certified copies, how privacy is maintained, and what ensures data integrity.
- N Design telehealth visit conduct as a documentation and data-capture problem, identifying what cannot be done remotely.
Module 5
M6
1 lesson
- Locked.Home nursing, mobile units and service-provider oversightLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Assess a home-nursing or mobile-research-unit provider's suitability for a given trial.
- A Identify who decides on a service provider's appropriateness and who holds oversight when the sponsor arranged the provider.
- N Design the information flow from a home visit to the investigator such that it supports decisions on participant care.
- A Specify what personal information each service provider requires, and the safeguard attached to each disclosure.
- N Identify the local licensure and scope-of-practice questions a home or mobile delivery model raises, and identify who must resolve them.
Module 6
M7
1 lesson
- Locked.Direct-to-participant investigational product supply and accountabilityLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Design an IMP supply model for a decentralised element covering supply, storage, dispensing, administration, return, accountability documentation and destruction or alternative disposition.
- A Distinguish investigator/institution-arranged from sponsor-arranged shipment and state precisely what changes.
- A Address all five matters Annex 2 §2.3.1 requires when shipping IMP to a participant.
- N Assess an IMP's suitability for direct-to-participant supply against the §3.6.1 factors.
- A Ensure sponsor-initiated shipment occurs only after investigator authorisation.
- N Design blinding protection through a decentralised supply chain.
- A Determine when existing pharmacy or institutional documentation suffices.
Module 7
M8
1 lesson
- Locked.Digital health technologies and digital endpointsLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Determine whether a proposed DHT is fit for purpose for its intended role, and document the assessment including validation status.
- A Distinguish verification, analytical validation and clinical validation as three separate evidentiary questions, and identify which is unanswered in a given evidence package.
- N Specify a digital endpoint: measurand, technology, context of use, analysis, and clinical meaningfulness argument.
- A Apply the DAT consequences to a wearable — validated and ready before use, accompanied by relevant metadata, not under exclusive sponsor control.
- N Plan participant-facing DHT logistics and treat gaps in them as risks.
- A Specify how DHT-generated safety information reaches the investigator "relevant, meaningful and manageable".
Module 8
M9
1 lesson
- Locked.ePRO, eCOA and instrument migrationLocked
On completion you will be able to
- A Select an ePRO/eCOA instrument appropriate to a population and endpoint.
- N Assess a proposed migration from paper to screen as a minor, moderate or substantial change, and specify equivalence evidence proportionate to it.
- A Design ePRO administration: windows, reminders, missed-entry rules, back-entry rules and their justification.
- N Identify the analysis consequences of an instrument change made mid-study.
- A Ensure the investigator has timely access to ePRO data affecting eligibility, treatment or safety without breaking blinding.
Module 9
M10
1 lesson
- Locked.Data flow, remote source access and oversight architectureLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Draw a complete data flow for a trial with decentralised elements, identifying every originator, transfer and control point.
- A Identify the source record for every data element and confirm the investigator has defined it before the trial starts.
- N Determine the extent of sponsor access to individual-level data and to data in source records that a use case requires, proportionate to criticality.
- A Specify arrangements where data are owned or controlled by another entity, including regulatory-authority access for inspection.
- N Design remote monitoring including remote read-only source access, and state the site's obligations in granting it.
- A Specify data-linkage rules including pre-specification and inconsistency resolution.
- N Design sponsor oversight across many service providers.
Module 10
M11
1 lesson
- Locked.Privacy, equity and jurisdictionLocked
On completion you will be able to
- A Identify every point at which a participant's personal information reaches a party who would not receive it in a conventional trial, and specify the safeguard.
- N Assess data-protection obligations for continuously-collected data and allocate controller and processor roles across the parties.
- N Assess a decentralised design for participant equity in both directions — who it includes and who it excludes.
- A Identify the local licensure and cross-jurisdiction questions a design raises and who must resolve them.
- N Assess breach risk for DHT and RWD data and specify mitigation.
Module 11
M12
1 lesson
- Locked.Risk assessment and integrated capstoneLocked
On completion you will be able to
- N Conduct a risk assessment of a trial's decentralised elements and produce proportionate controls.
- N Integrate the programme: take a conventional protocol, propose a decentralised design, justify each element, and document the oversight, data, privacy and equity consequences.
- N Defend the design against challenge, and identify the elements you would drop first under pressure.
Assessment
How the exam works
The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.
Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.
Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.
Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.
Certifying authority
Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD
CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.
CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.
What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.







