IITP (CASRAI)
Investigator-Initiated Trial Management Certification — Professional
What you earn
The credential itself
Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal IITP (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.
CASRAI Certification
Certificate of Professional Competence
This is to certify that
Dr. Amelia R. Hartley
has completed the prescribed programme of study and passed the examination in
Investigator-Initiated Trial Management — Professional
and is admitted to the designationIITP (CASRAI)
Certifications

IITP (CASRAI) — Investigator-Initiated Trial Management, Professional
CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-IIT-2026-O8OR4K
casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-IIT-2026-O8OR4K
Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.
It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.
About this credential
What it covers
Body of knowledge
Exam blueprint
The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.
| Domain | Proportion of exam | Weight | Items |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deciding whether to become a sponsorD1 | 14%≈ 10 items | ≈ 10 | |
| The dual role, and where the two halves conflictD2 | 16%≈ 11 items | ≈ 11 | |
| Protocol, Investigator's Brochure and the investigational planD3 | 12%≈ 9 items | ≈ 9 | |
| Sponsor-level safety reportingD4 | 14%≈ 10 items | ≈ 10 | |
| Data and safety monitoring, and discharging § 312.50D5 | 14%≈ 10 items | ≈ 10 | |
| Multi-site IITs, the coordinating centre, and registrationD6 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| Essential records, the sponsor TMF and inspection exposureD7 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| Product supply, agreements, funding and institutional infrastructureD8 | 10%≈ 7 items | ≈ 7 | |
| Total | 100% | 71 |
Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.
Syllabus
8 modules, 8 lessons
Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.
8 modules · 8 lessons · 100 h
Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.
Module 1
M1
1 lesson · 12 h
- Locked.Deciding whether to become a sponsor12 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- By the end of this module, the candidate can:
- Apply 21 CFR 312.2 and 812.2 to determine whether an IND or IDE is required for a described study, and produce a written determination with reasoning.
- Distinguish the §312.2(b)(1) marketed-drug exemption from the §312.2(d) practice-of-medicine provision, and explain the distinction to a non-regulatory audience.
- Draft a §312.2(e) request for FDA's advice where the determination is genuinely uncertain.
- Enumerate, before any Form FDA 1571 is signed, what accepting the sponsor role costs in named obligations, named people and named infrastructure.
- Identify the situations — expanded access above all — in which an individual becomes a sponsor-investigator without intending to.
Module 2
M2
1 lesson · 16 h
- Locked.The dual role, and where the two halves conflict16 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Map every sponsor obligation and every investigator obligation for a described study onto named individuals, and identify every point at which one person holds both sides.
- Design a specific control for each of the six named conflicts.
- Apply §312.52 to a proposed obligation transfer and identify what has not been transferred.
- Distinguish obligations that may be delegated from those that may not, and state the regulatory basis for each.
Module 3
M3
1 lesson · 10 h
- Locked.Protocol, Investigator’s Brochure and the investigational plan10 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Author or review a protocol meeting §312.23(a)(6)(iii)'s content requirements at a depth proportionate to phase.
- Determine correctly whether an investigator's brochure is required, and where it is not, design and document a substitute — labelled explicitly as practice, not regulation.
- State precisely what §312.55(b) still requires of a sponsor-investigator who is relieved of the IB obligation under §312.55(a).
- Author a device investigational plan meeting §812.25.
Module 4
M4
1 lesson · 14 h
- Locked.Sponsor-level safety reporting14 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Apply the three-part §312.32(c)(1)(i) threshold and identify which clock applies and what event starts it.
- Operate and evidence the sponsor's distribution obligation to FDA and all participating investigators.
- Apply the device safety obligations at §812.46 and §812.150(b) with their working-day clocks.
- Reconcile a year's safety reports against the §312.33 annual report.
Module 5
M5
1 lesson · 14 h
- Locked.Data and safety monitoring, and discharging §312.5014 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Author a data and safety monitoring plan proportionate to risk, stating what each element is required by (or honestly, that it is not).
- Determine whether a DSMB or DMC is required, and where it is a design choice rather than a regulatory mandate, establish one to a defensible standard.
- Design how a single-site academic sponsor with no monitoring department discharges §312.50's "proper monitoring" obligation, and evidence that it was discharged.
- Distinguish sponsor monitoring, data and safety monitoring, and IRB continuing review, and identify which obligation a given activity actually satisfies.
Module 6
M6
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.Multi-site IITs, the coordinating centre, and registration8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Identify which sponsor obligations become materially harder at more than one site, and design the coordinating-centre function that discharges each.
- Obtain and maintain the correct investigator instrument (1572 for drugs; the §812.43(c) investigator agreement for devices — not a form).
- Advise correctly on IRB arrangements for a multi-site FDA-regulated study, including the real absence of a single-IRB mandate outside HHS-supported cooperative research.
- Determine, execute and, where necessary, withdraw a ClinicalTrials.gov responsible-party designation.
Module 7
M7
1 lesson · 8 h
- Locked.Essential records, the sponsor TMF and inspection exposure8 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- State what records the sponsor must hold, distinct from what the site holds, and design a file architecture that keeps both.
- Apply the ICH E6(R3) essentiality test rather than a fixed document list.
- Apply the correct retention rule and identify why neither is a fixed number of years from study end.
- Prepare an institution for a sponsor inspection, as distinct from a site inspection.
Module 8
M8
1 lesson · 18 h
- Locked.Product supply, agreements, funding and institutional infrastructure18 h · Locked
On completion you will be able to
- Design investigational product supply, labelling, accountability and disposition for an academic sponsor.
- Identify the regulatory constraints on obtaining product by compounding, and recognise when to escalate rather than proceed.
- Read an industry-supplied-drug agreement for the terms that determine whether a study is regulatorily feasible and who controls it.
- Apply §312.8 where an institution proposes to charge for investigational product.
- Advise an institution on the infrastructure a functioning IIT programme needs, and articulate what is missing without it.
Assessment
How the exam works
The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.
Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.
Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.
Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.
Certifying authority
Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD
CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.
CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.
What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.







