Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0

PVSF (CASRAI)

Pharmacovigilance & Drug Safety Certification — Foundation

LevelFoundationPVSPVSF (CASRAI)
31 h
Nominal
Self-paced study
6
Lessons
6 modules
6
Domains
Exam blueprint
41
Exam items
Per attempt
70%
Pass mark
Fixed, uncurved
90
Retake wait
Days

What you earn

The credential itself

Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal PVSF (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

Specimen. Issued as a signed PDF and as a machine-readable Open Badge; the holder and code shown are illustrative.
How it appears on your CV

Certifications

PVSF (CASRAI)Pharmacovigilance & Drug Safety, Foundation

CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-PVS-2026-IOSGWN

casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-PVS-2026-IOSGWN

Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.

It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.

About this credential

What it covers

Body of knowledge

Exam blueprint

The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.

Domains and weights6 domains · 41 scored items
DomainWeight
Safety vocabulary and its precisionF1
22%9 items
The individual case safety reportF2
18%7 items
Seriousness, expectedness and causalityF3
20%8 items
Coding and grading: MedDRA and CTCAEF4
16%7 items
Expedited reporting — who, what, when, to whomF5
14%6 items
The pharmacovigilance landscapeF6
10%4 items
Total100%

Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.

Syllabus

6 modules, 6 lessons

Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.

6 modules · 6 lessons · 31 h

Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.

  1. Module 1

    F-M1

    1 lesson · 7 h

    1. Locked.The vocabulary of safety7 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • On completion the learner can:
      • Define adverse event, adverse drug reaction, suspected adverse reaction, serious adverse event, serious adverse reaction and SUSAR, and cite the document each definition comes from.
      • Distinguish "serious" from "severe" and explain why the distinction determines a reporting obligation.
      • Apply the five seriousness criteria and the important-medical-event clause to described occurrences.
      • Explain why E2A and E2D define overlapping terms differently.
      • Identify deprecated and imprecise usage — "side effect", "AE" used where "ADR" is meant, "serious" used to mean "bad".
      • Recognise that an adverse event of special interest is a sponsor construct and not a regulatory seriousness category.
  2. Module 2

    F-M2

    1 lesson · 5 h

    1. Locked.From a report to a case5 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • The learner can:
      • Determine whether an incoming report meets the minimum criteria to constitute a valid case, and state which list they applied.
      • Identify day zero for a described intake.
      • Classify a report by source — spontaneous, solicited, literature, regulatory authority.
      • Specify what follow-up must be sought and explain what a follow-up report restarts.
      • Explain why duplicate detection is a safety activity rather than an administrative one.
  3. Module 3

    F-M3

    1 lesson · 6 h

    1. Locked.The three axes: serious, unexpected, related6 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • The learner can:
      • Assess seriousness, expectedness and causality as three independent judgements and explain why collapsing any two produces a reporting error.
      • Select the correct reference document for an expectedness assessment.
      • Apply E2A's specificity/severity rule to determine that a more specific or more severe manifestation of a listed reaction is unexpected.
      • State who may make a causality determination and explain why a sponsor's disagreement does not remove reportability.
      • Combine the three axes to reach a reporting decision.
  4. Module 4

    F-M4

    1 lesson · 5 h

    1. Locked.Coding and grading5 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • The learner can:
      • Name the five MedDRA levels in order and state which provides maximum specificity.
      • Explain multi-axiality and state what the primary SOC prevents.
      • Distinguish MedDRA's purpose from CTCAE's and select the right one for a stated purpose.
      • Read a CTCAE grade correctly and explain why a grade is not a seriousness determination.
      • Identify a version-alignment problem between a protocol, a grading scale and a coding dictionary.
  5. Module 5

    F-M5

    1 lesson · 5 h

    1. Locked.Clocks and destinations5 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • The learner can:
      • Determine whether a case qualifies for expedited reporting.
      • State the applicable timeline and name the jurisdiction it comes from.
      • List every party entitled to receive the report.
      • Distinguish the regulatory clock from the protocol clock and from the IRB/IEC requirement.
  6. Module 6

    F-M6

    1 lesson · 3 h

    1. Locked.The safety landscape3 h · Locked

      On completion you will be able to

      • The learner can:
      • Contrast trial pharmacovigilance with post-marketing pharmacovigilance on reference document, population, denominator and reporting framework.
      • Name the principal spontaneous reporting systems and state what each covers.
      • Explain why spontaneous data cannot support incidence estimation.
      • Describe, at awareness level, what a signal is and what a risk management plan is for.

Assessment

How the exam works

The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.

Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.

Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.

Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.

Certifying authority

Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD

CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.

CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.

What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

The ladder

Other levels of Pharmacovigilance & Drug Safety

Levels are independent purchases. There is no prerequisite chain — sit whichever level matches the work you already do.

All CASRAI credentials

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →