Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Non-competitive grant

A funding award made without a comparative peer-reviewed competition, either through direct invitation, formula allocation, or as a routine continuation of an existing multi-year award.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 5 Sept 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Non-competitive grant

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim. When our sources don't cover a question, it says so.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    The year-2 segment of a 5-year R01 grant is released as a non-competitive continuation.

  • Is an instance

    UK QR (Quality Related) block funding allocated to universities by REF formula is non-competitive.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    An open call for proposals with peer review is competitive.

  • Not an instance

    A new application that competes against others for funding is competitive.

Editorial commentary

Non-competitive grants include continuation segments of multi-year awards (where year-2 and year-3 funding is released subject to satisfactory progress, not re-competed against other applicants), formula-based block grants to institutions (for example UK QR funding allocated to universities by the Research Excellence Framework’s formula), and directed or sole-source awards to a designated entity chosen for a unique capability rather than through comparative review.

Non-competitive does not mean unaccountable

Removing peer-reviewed competition from how an award is initiated does not remove the accountability mechanisms that apply once it is active: progress reporting, rebudgeting controls, and audit requirements (see Single Audit and the underlying cost-allowability rules) apply to non-competitive awards on the same basis as competitively won ones. A continuation segment can still be reduced, held, or terminated if progress reporting reveals a problem — non-competitive describes how the funding decision was made, not the ongoing oversight regime.

Where it sits relative to other funding-timing terms

A non-competitive continuation is distinct from bridge funding, which is institutional money covering a genuine gap between two separate awards, and from a no-cost extension, which extends the period of performance of an existing award using its own remaining funds rather than releasing a new continuation segment. It is also distinct from a milestone payment, which releases funds contingent on a specific deliverable rather than the passage of a budget period.

Worked example

An NIH R01 is awarded for five years with year-1 funding obligated at the notice of award. Years 2 through 5 are released as non-competing continuation awards, contingent on the annual Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) showing satisfactory progress — the institution does not resubmit a new competing application for each year.

Counter-example

A renewal application submitted at the end of a project period, which is peer-reviewed and scored alongside new applications for the same funding pool, is a competitive renewal, not a non-competitive continuation — the distinguishing factor is whether the funding decision goes through comparative peer review again.

References

  • US NIH Grants Policy Statement, continuation/non-competing renewal provisions.
  • Research England, QR funding methodology (REF-formula block grant allocation).

Also known as

Continuation funding (non-competitive) · Formula grant · Directed grant

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Non-competitive grant"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/non-competitive-grant" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/non-competitive-grant",
  "name": "Non-competitive grant",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/non-competitive-grant",
  "description": "A funding award made without a comparative peer-reviewed competition, either through direct invitation, formula allocation, or as a routine continuation of an existing multi-year award.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/funding-finance#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/non-competitive-grant",
  "alternateName": [
    "Continuation funding (non-competitive)",
    "Formula grant",
    "Directed grant"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:58",
  "dateModified": "2026-09-05T17:32:25",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Ask this page a question. Get answers citing the rule.

Ask about your own case — the exception, the edge case, the two rules that conflict. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after, cancel anytime.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.