Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & Research SupplyReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us
Grants Management & Research Funding

Core Facilities & Shared Research Infrastructure

Core facilities — shared instrumentation and service centers such as genomics cores, imaging centers, and animal facilities — sit at the intersection of research administration and financial operations in a way that ordinary grant-funded projects do not: they must be funded, staffed, and equipped, but then recover their operating costs from the individual researchers and grants that use them, typically through federally negotiated user-fee rates. This sub-cluster covers that dual character: how core facilities are established and funded, and how they are subsequently operated and charged out. On the funding side, the NIH's S10 Shared Instrumentation Grant program is the primary federal mechanism referenced here, providing awards specifically for the purchase of expensive, shared-use research instrumentation that individual investigator grants are not intended to cover. Institutions apply on behalf of a group of investigator-users, and the resulting equipment typically becomes core-facility infrastructure rather than the property of a single lab. On the operating side, this sub-cluster covers the institutional practices that govern core-facility cost recovery: rate-setting methodologies, the distinction between internal and external user rates, subsidization policy, and the relationship between core-facility rates and an institution's federally negotiated facilities-and-administrative cost rate. These practices vary by institution more than the funding mechanisms do, since they are governed by internal policy and, for federally compliant rate-setting, by Uniform Guidance cost-principle requirements rather than by a single national standard.

Guides

Kajabi vs Teachable for professional bodies running CPD

Kajabi vs Teachable judged for societies selling paid CPD — certificates, cohort drip, institutional invoicing, and when neither replaces a real LMS.

Nonprofit Donor Management Software for Advancement Offices

Nonprofit donor management software compared for university advancement and research foundations — honest price bands, plus Circle from $89/mo.

Best webinar platforms for seminars, CME and cohort teaching

The best platform for webinar series in research: how Zoom, GoTo, Livestorm, Demio, ON24 and Circle compare on attendance tracking, recordings and SSO.

Absorb LMS pricing for research institutes, trials units and academic departments

Absorb LMS pricing is quote-only. How the platform fee, per-user basis, seat bands, implementation and minimum term build into a real budget line.

Membership Management Software for Nonprofits: AMS vs Community Platform

Membership management software for nonprofits: AMS vs community platform, what each breaks on, and Circle from $89/mo. Verified 18 August 2026.

Healthcare learning management systems for hospitals, trial units and research networks

A healthcare learning management system must produce evidence: mandatory training records, GCP and HIPAA completion, sign-off and an audit trail.

Circle pricing for departments, societies and research networks

Circle pricing for departments and societies: what each plan unlocks, transaction fees on paid memberships, and real cost per member at 100, 500 and 2,000.

Circle vs Skool vs Mighty Networks for research communities

Which community platform fits a society, a research network or a single cohort — compared on structure, courses, moderation and member payments.

Circle review: community, courses and payments in one place

Circle reviewed for societies and research networks: plans, transaction fees, what the moderator limits mean, and the honest case against buying it.

Community platforms for research networks and societies

Replacing a listserv or dormant forum: how community platforms compare on cost, courses, member payments and data ownership for societies and networks.

NIH IDeA Program: COBRE and INBRE Explained

A guide to the NIH IDeA program and its two best-known mechanisms, COBRE and INBRE: eligible states, program structure, budgets, and how a research office handles each.

NSF ACCESS: National HPC Allocation vs. Campus Recharge Models

How NSF’s ACCESS program allocates national supercomputing resources through merit-reviewed credit tiers, and how this differs from a campus HPC recharge/chargeback billing model.

NSF MRI (Major Research Instrumentation Program): Tracks, Eligibility, and How to Apply

A practical guide to NSF’s Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program: its three funding tracks, acquisition vs. development proposals, eligibility, cost-share status, submission limits, and current solicitation timing.

Core Facility Management Software: iLab, Stratocore, and How Scheduling/Billing Platforms Work

What core facility scheduling/billing software (iLab Solutions, Stratocore PPMS) actually does, and how it relates to 2 CFR 200.468 rate compliance.

Research Infrastructure Funding: Programs for Equipment, Facilities, and Instrumentation

How research infrastructure funding differs from project grants, and the major federal and international mechanisms — NSF MRI, NIH S10, Canada’s CFI, ARC LIEF, and UKRI — that fund shared equipment, facilities, and computing infrastructure.

Core Facility (Research Core): What It Is and How Shared Research Infrastructure Is Organized

What a core facility is, how NIH S10 grants fund shared equipment, and how 2 CFR 200.468 governs core-facility recharge-rate cost recovery.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →