Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & Research SupplyReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Direct comparison

NIH S10 vs NSF MRI Grant Comparison

Compare NIH S10 (SIG/HEI) and NSF MRI: award size, tracks, eligibility, and indirect-cost rules for shared scientific instrumentation grants.

Ask about NIH S10 vs NSF MRI Grant Comparison

Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

How do NIH S10 (SIG/HEI), NSF MRI compare side by side?

The table below compares NIH S10 (SIG/HEI), NSF MRI across 10 procurement-relevant dimensions, from administering agency through typical instruments.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionNIH S10 (SIG/HEI)NSF MRI
Administering agencyNIH, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP/DPCPSI)National Science Foundation (NSF)
What it fundsA single high-cost, commercially available instrument for shared useAcquisition of a commercial instrument OR development of a new instrument with novel capabilities
Award rangeSIG: $50,000-$750,000. HEI: $750,001-$2,000,000Track 1: >$100,000-<$1.4M. Track 2: $1.4M-$4M. Track 3 (helium-conserving): $100,000-$4M
Formal applicantThe institution, not an individual PIThe institution, not an individual PI
Minimum user groupAt least 3 "Major Users," each PD/PI of a distinct active NIH awardDocumented multi-user group; no numeric minimum identified in materials reviewed -- confirm against live solicitation
Per-institution submission limitNot identified in materials reviewed -- confirm against the live NOFOTrack 1: up to 2. Track 2: 1. Track 3: 1 (per competition)
Cost sharingNot established from a primary source for this page -- confirm against live NOFOWaived for new awards for a 5-year period starting FY 2023 -- confirm current status
Indirect (F&A) costsNot permitted -- treated as capital equipment, not a research projectCould not be independently verified for this page -- confirm against live solicitation
Current submission status (as of Aug 2026)NIH reissues SIG/HEI FOAs on a recurring cycle -- confirm current deadline on grants.nih.govFY2026 window paused; new submissions anticipated to reopen ~Oct 15-Nov 16, 2026
Typical instrumentsConfocal/light microscopes, flow cytometers, sequencers, mass spectrometers, X-ray diffractometers, high-field NMRMass spectrometers, NMR systems, imaging platforms, and comparable major multi-user equipment

Common questions

Common questions about NIH S10 (SIG/HEI) vs NSF MRI

What is the main difference between NIH S10 and NSF MRI?

+

They are parallel shared-instrumentation mechanisms from different agencies. NIH S10 (SIG/HEI) is a two-tier program capped at $2,000,000 and built around a minimum of three NIH-funded "Major Users." NSF MRI is a three-track program capped at $4,000,000 that explicitly distinguishes acquisition from development proposals and includes a dedicated track for helium-conserving equipment.

Can a single principal investigator apply for NIH S10 or NSF MRI?

+

No. Both programs require the institution, not an individual PI, to be the formal applicant on behalf of a documented multi-user group.

Which program funds larger awards, NIH S10 or NSF MRI?

+

NSF MRI's ceiling is higher: up to $4,000,000 under Track 2 or Track 3, compared with S10's High-End Instrumentation (HEI) Grant ceiling of $2,000,000.

Is NSF currently accepting new MRI proposals?

+

As of this writing, NSF had paused the previously scheduled FY 2026 MRI submission window to prioritize funding additional FY 2025 cohort proposals, with new submissions anticipated to reopen in a window tentatively scheduled for October 15-November 16, 2026. Confirm current status directly with NSF.

Does either program cover indirect (F&A) costs?

+

NIH S10 explicitly does not permit facilities-and-administrative costs to be charged against the award. NSF MRI's indirect-cost treatment could not be independently verified for this page -- confirm against the live MRI solicitation.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →