Definition · Plain-language
Belmont Report
The Belmont Report is the 1979 statement of ethical principles that underpins the protection of human subjects in US research.
The step most authors miss
Doing CRediT right? Don’t stop at the statement.
A CRediT statement credits you inside one paper. The recognition CRediT was built for happens when those roles are tied to you, persistently. Sign in with your ORCID — free — and claim your CRediT contributions on casrai.org, the home of the standard. They become a verified, portable part of your identity, not a line that disappears into one PDF.
Free: claim your contributions, then export a journal-ready CRediT statement, schema.org structured data, JATS XML, CSV or BibTeX — and preview your public profile. A membership publishes that profile publicly and verifies the journals you serve.
Origin
The Belmont Report was issued in 1979 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, created by the U.S. National Research Act of 1974. It responded to ethical failures in earlier research, most notably the Tuskegee syphilis study. The report distilled a small set of broad principles intended to guide ethical decisions across all human-subjects research, rather than a long list of rules.
The three principles
Respect for persons treats individuals as autonomous agents and protects those with diminished autonomy, grounding the requirement for informed consent. Beneficence obliges researchers to maximise possible benefits and minimise harms, grounding the assessment of risks and benefits. Justice concerns the fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of research, grounding equitable selection of subjects so that vulnerable groups are not exploited.
Its lasting influence
The Belmont principles became the ethical foundation of U.S. federal regulation. The Common Rule (45 CFR 46) operationalises them through Institutional Review Board review, informed-consent requirements, and special protections for vulnerable populations. Decades on, the report remains the reference framework taught in research-ethics training and cited when novel ethical questions arise that the regulations do not directly address.
Key facts
At a glance
- Definition: foundational US human-subjects research-ethics report
- Published: 1979
- Author: National Commission (under the 1974 National Research Act)
- Principles: respect for persons, beneficence, justice
- Applications: informed consent; risk/benefit; fair subject selection
- Legacy: ethical basis of the Common Rule and IRB review
Common misconceptions
What people often get wrong
Often heard: The Belmont Report is a law or regulation.
Actually: It is an ethics report, not a regulation. Its principles were later codified into federal regulation through the Common Rule (45 CFR 46).
Often heard: The Belmont Report has four principles.
Actually: It sets out three principles — respect for persons, beneficence and justice. The four-principle approach is a separate bioethics framework.
Often heard: It applies only to medical research.
Actually: Its principles apply to all research with human subjects, including behavioural and social-science research.
Going deeper
