Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DProposedv2026.2

Research integrity

The umbrella construct covering accurate reporting, faithful data representation, fair attribution, conflict-of-interest declaration, humane treatment of subjects, and responsible resource stewardship, distinct from research ethics and research compliance.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask about Research integrity

Answers are drawn from this dictionary entry and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    An institution investigating an image-duplication allegation under its own research-integrity policy, informed by ORI's FFP definition and its institutional Concordat commitments.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A disagreement between two research groups over how to interpret an ambiguous dataset is a scientific dispute, not a research-integrity matter, absent evidence of fabrication, falsification or plagiarism.

Editorial commentary

Research integrity is the umbrella construct under which specific responsible-conduct expectations sit: accurate reporting, faithful representation of data, fair attribution, declaration of conflicts of interest, humane treatment of human and animal subjects, and good stewardship of resources. It is distinct from research ethics (centred on the rights and welfare of subjects) and from research compliance (centred on regulatory rule-following), though the three overlap substantially in practice. This entry works as a routing hub across CASRAI’s research-integrity family rather than restating each concept below it.

Where the boundary sits: misconduct

Research misconduct is the narrowest, most consequential category — and has no single global definition; what counts, who investigates it, and what standard of proof applies vary meaningfully by jurisdiction. See fabrication, falsification, and the falsification vs fabrication comparison for the core FFP categories most jurisdictions recognise in some form.

Practices that fall short of misconduct but still erode integrity

A wider set of questionable research practices sit below the misconduct threshold but are still integrity concerns, typically handled through journal or institutional policy rather than a formal misconduct finding: salami slicing, duplicate publication, HARKing, ghost authorship, gift authorship, and coercive citation.

Who oversees it

Oversight bodies vary by country and hold different powers: the US Office of Research Integrity administers a federal regulatory definition (42 CFR Part 93); the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) is an advisory charity with no investigatory power, working from the UK Concordat; ENRIO, the European Network of Research Integrity Offices, coordinates practice across national bodies whose statutory powers vary widely.

Foundational statements

The Singapore Statement (2010), the Hong Kong Principles (2020), and the ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2023 revision) articulate shared operational principles across these otherwise fragmented jurisdictional definitions, without themselves being legally binding in any one country.

References

  • Singapore Statement on Research Integrity, 2010. ALLEA European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, 2023 revision. Hong Kong Principles (Moher et al.), 2020.

Also known as

responsible conduct of research · RCR · scientific integrity

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Research integrity"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/research-integrity" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/research-integrity",
  "name": "Research integrity",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/research-integrity",
  "description": "The umbrella construct covering accurate reporting, faithful data representation, fair attribution, conflict-of-interest declaration, humane treatment of subjects, and responsible resource stewardship, distinct from research ethics and research compliance.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-integrity#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/research-integrity",
  "sameAs": [
    "responsible conduct of research",
    "RCR",
    "scientific integrity"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:51",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-23T05:13:42",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →