Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0

CRediT adoption

eLife

eLife requires a structured CRediT contributor statement on every submission. Roles are part of the manuscript record and are published with the article alongside the public peer-review process eLife runs.

NativeAdopted 2018~1 journalsCustom (eLife platform, built on the Coko ecosystem)

Overview

Where eLife stands on CRediT

eLife requires a structured CRediT contributor statement on every submission. Roles are part of the manuscript record and are published with the article alongside the public peer-review process eLife runs.

Scope: Required for all eLife submissions

Implementation details

How CRediT is captured and produced

Submission systemCustom (eLife platform, built on the Coko ecosystem)
JATS implementationNative JATS <role vocab="credit"> output as part of eLifes open-source publishing toolchain; CRediT data flows into the public manuscript record alongside reviewer and editor contributions.
Production workflowCRediT data flows from the submission record into the eLife JATS XML and into the published article. Because eLife publishes peer-review reports, the platform also captures structured reviewer contribution metadata.

For authors

Author guidance — submitting to a eLife journal

When submitting to eLife, complete the per-author CRediT role assignment in the submission interface. Authors can also acknowledge reviewer and editor contributions, which eLife publishes as part of its open editorial model.

For general CRediT submission guidance across publishers, see CRediT for authors.

Sample journals

Representative eLife titles with CRediT capture

  • eLife

Adoption history

Notable milestones

eLife was an early advocate of CRediT in the open-science community and pairs structured CRediT with public peer-review reports under the eLife model launched in 2023.

Notes

Caveats and context

Since 2023, eLife does not issue accept/reject decisions — every paper that passes peer review is published with a public eLife Assessment.

Frequently asked

Common questions about eLife and CRediT

Does eLife require CRediT contributor statements?
Yes. eLife captures structured CRediT statements as part of its standard submission flow. eLife requires a structured CRediT contributor statement on every submission. Roles are part of the manuscript record and are published with the article alongside the public peer-review process eLife runs.
Which eLife journals support CRediT?
Representative eLife titles known to support structured CRediT capture include eLife. Scope: Required for all eLife submissions. Check the individual journals author instructions to confirm the current contributor-roles policy.
How do I add CRediT to my eLife submission?
When submitting to eLife, complete the per-author CRediT role assignment in the submission interface. Authors can also acknowledge reviewer and editor contributions, which eLife publishes as part of its open editorial model.
What submission system does eLife use for CRediT capture?
eLife uses Custom (eLife platform, built on the Coko ecosystem). Native JATS <role vocab="credit"> output as part of eLifes open-source publishing toolchain; CRediT data flows into the public manuscript record alongside reviewer and editor contributions.
When did eLife adopt CRediT?
eLife adopted CRediT around 2018. eLife was an early advocate of CRediT in the open-science community and pairs structured CRediT with public peer-review reports under the eLife model launched in 2023.

References

Sources

  • eLife author guide — manuscript submission
  • Holcombe (2019) Publications — CRediT adoption review

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →