Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
Concentrated sulfuric acid (Class 8, Corrosive) is commonly assigned Packing Group II based on how quickly it destroys skin tissue on contact, requiring UN-specification packaging rated at least "Y."
- Is an instance
A Class 3 flammable liquid with a flash point at the higher end of the flammable range is typically assigned Packing Group III — still a fully regulated hazmat, but at the least restrictive of the three tiers.
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
Dry ice (UN 1845), a Class 9 miscellaneous dangerous good, is not assigned any packing group under DOT or IATA rules — it is still fully regulated (with its own quantity and marking requirements), illustrating that "no packing group" does not mean "no hazard."
Editorial commentary
A packing group is a three-tier classification (Packing Group I, II, or III) that the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 172-173) and the parallel United Nations Model Regulations use to indicate how much danger a hazardous material presents within its assigned hazard class. It is not a hazard class itself — it is a severity modifier applied on top of the hazard class (flammable liquid, corrosive, toxic substance, and so on) that a shipper has already determined for a chemical. The packing group is one of the pieces of information — alongside the UN number, proper shipping name, and hazard class — that must be identified before a hazardous material can be legally offered for transport, and it directly determines the performance level of packaging required, the maximum quantities allowed per package, and which simplified shipping provisions (limited quantity, excepted quantity) a shipment may qualify for.
The Three Packing Groups
- Packing Group I — Great danger. The most hazardous tier within a given class. Materials assigned Packing Group I require the most robust UN-specification packaging and carry the lowest quantity limits.
- Packing Group II — Medium danger. The middle tier; most common lab solvents and reagents that qualify as regulated hazardous materials at all tend to fall here.
- Packing Group III — Minor danger. The least hazardous tier that still meets the threshold for regulation. A Packing Group III material is still a fully regulated hazmat — “minor” is relative to Packing Groups I and II, not an exemption.
How a Packing Group Is Assigned
Packing group assignment is not a single universal test — the specific numeric or physical criteria differ by hazard class, and are set out class-by-class in 49 CFR 173.121 through 173.137 (and the corresponding UN Model Regulations test criteria). In broad terms:
- Flammable liquids (Class 3) are assigned a packing group based primarily on flash point and initial boiling point — materials that ignite at lower temperatures and boil at lower temperatures are assigned a more severe packing group.
- Toxic substances (Class 6.1) are assigned a packing group based on measured oral, dermal, and inhalation toxicity values (LD50/LC50) — lower doses required to cause harm mean a more severe packing group.
- Corrosive materials (Class 8) are assigned a packing group based primarily on the observed contact time needed to cause full-thickness destruction of skin tissue, and in some cases corrosion rate on steel or aluminum reference surfaces.
Because the criteria are class-specific, the same packing group label means something different depending on which hazard class it’s attached to — a Packing Group II flammable liquid and a Packing Group II corrosive are dangerous for entirely different physical reasons, and the number alone doesn’t tell you which.
Not every hazard class uses packing groups at all. Explosives (Class 1) use a separate division-and-compatibility-group system instead; gases (Class 2) and radioactive material (Class 7) are not assigned a packing group; and infectious substances (Class 6.2) use the Category A/Category B system rather than a packing group. Within Class 9 (miscellaneous dangerous goods), some materials get a packing group and some — dry ice (UN 1845) and lithium batteries among them — do not.
Why the Packing Group Matters for Shipping
The assigned packing group drives several concrete, downstream requirements once a lab is ready to actually ship a hazardous material:
- UN-specification packaging performance level. Packaging tested and marked to the UN specification carries a performance-level code — X, Y, or Z — printed as part of its UN packaging marking. “X” packaging is rated for Packing Groups I, II, and III; “Y” packaging is rated for Packing Groups II and III only; “Z” packaging is rated for Packing Group III only. A shipper must use packaging rated for the material’s actual packing group (or a more protective one) — Z-rated packaging cannot legally be used for a Packing Group I material.
- Maximum quantity per package. DOT and IATA packing instructions set lower maximum quantities per inner and outer packaging for more severe packing groups, and Packing Group I materials are frequently excluded from the most permissive quantity exceptions entirely.
- Eligibility for limited quantity and excepted quantity provisions. These simplified shipping paths — which reduce marking, labeling, and Shipper’s Declaration requirements for small amounts of lower-risk material — are generally available only to Packing Group II and III materials in modest quantities; Packing Group I materials are typically excluded or subject to much lower quantity thresholds.
Worked Examples
Concentrated sulfuric acid (Class 8, Corrosive) is commonly assigned Packing Group II, based on the short contact time it takes to cause full-thickness skin destruction — a lab shipping it must use UN-specification packaging rated at least “Y,” and it is not eligible for the most permissive excepted-quantity shipping paths available to milder corrosives.
A dilute laboratory buffer or reagent classified as a Class 3 flammable liquid with a flash point in the higher end of the flammable range is a typical Packing Group III example — it is still a regulated hazardous material and still requires UN-specification packaging, marking, and (above small-quantity thresholds) a Shipper’s Declaration, but at the least restrictive of the three tiers.
Counter-Example: Materials With No Packing Group at All
Dry ice (UN 1845), the Class 9 miscellaneous dangerous good labs most commonly ship to keep biological or temperature-sensitive material cold, is not assigned a packing group under either the DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations or the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations. This is not the same thing as “not regulated” — dry ice still has its own quantity limits, marking requirements, and (above certain thresholds) documentation requirements. It illustrates that “no packing group” and “no hazard” are different statements: some hazard classes and some specific UN numbers within Class 9 simply don’t use the packing group system to express severity, and a shipper has to check the applicable regulation rather than assume the absence of a packing group means the material is unregulated.
Where Packing Group Fits in the Classification-to-Shipment Process
Packing group is one of four pieces of information a shipper must determine before packaging a hazardous material for transport: the UN number, the proper shipping name, the hazard class (and any subsidiary risk), and — for classes that use it — the packing group. All four together determine which packing instruction applies and what packaging, marking, labeling, and documentation the shipment needs. Safety Data Sheet Section 14 (Transport Information) is the usual starting point for a chemical’s packing group, though the SDS entry should be checked against the current DOT Hazardous Materials Table (49 CFR 172.101) or IATA DGR classification table rather than assumed correct, since SDS transport information is not always kept current with regulatory changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does packing group mean in hazmat shipping?
It’s a three-tier severity rating (I, II, or III) assigned to a hazardous material within its hazard class, indicating how much danger it presents and driving the required UN-specification packaging performance level, maximum quantity per package, and eligibility for simplified shipping provisions.
What is Packing Group I?
Packing Group I is the most severe of the three packing group tiers, meaning “great danger” within the material’s hazard class. It requires the most robust UN-specification packaging (rated “X”) and carries the lowest quantity limits and the fewest simplified-shipping exceptions.
What is Packing Group II?
Packing Group II indicates “medium danger” within a hazard class. It requires UN-specification packaging rated at least “Y” and sits between Packing Group I and Packing Group III in allowable quantities and shipping restrictions.
What is Packing Group III?
Packing Group III indicates “minor danger” — the least severe of the three tiers, but still a fully regulated hazardous material. It requires UN-specification packaging rated at least “Z” and generally has the highest quantity limits and broadest access to limited/excepted quantity provisions among the three groups.
How is a hazardous material’s packing group determined?
By class-specific criteria set out in 49 CFR 173.121-173.137 and the parallel UN Model Regulations test criteria — for example, flash point and boiling point for flammable liquids, oral/dermal/inhalation toxicity values for toxic substances, and skin-contact corrosivity time for corrosives. The criteria differ by hazard class, so the assignment isn’t a single universal test.
Do all hazardous materials have a packing group?
No. Explosives, gases, and radioactive material don’t use the packing group system, infectious substances use the separate Category A/Category B system, and some Class 9 miscellaneous dangerous goods (dry ice and lithium batteries among them) are not assigned a packing group even though they are still regulated hazardous materials.
Related CASRAI Resources
- IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations: A Lab Shipper’s Guide — the full classify-pack-mark-declare workflow packing group fits into, including the nine UN hazard classes.
- Common Lab Chemical Hazard Classes Explained — how OSHA/GHS workplace hazard classes differ from the DOT/UN transport hazard class and packing group system.
- Shipping Biological Substances by Air: Category A vs. Category B — the separate classification system infectious substances use instead of a packing group.
- Hazmat Shipping Training and Certification Requirements for Lab Staff (DOT/IATA) — who must be trained to classify and package hazmat, including packing-group determinations.
- How to Read a Safety Data Sheet — where a chemical’s transport classification (SDS Section 14) fits into the broader SDS.
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Packing Group I, II & III (Hazmat)"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/packing-group-hazmat" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/packing-group-hazmat",
"name": "Packing Group I, II & III (Hazmat)",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/packing-group-hazmat",
"description": "A packing group is the DOT/UN three-tier severity classification (I = great danger, II = medium danger, III = minor danger) assigned to a hazardous material within its hazard class, using class-specific criteria under 49 CFR 173.121-173.137, that determines the required UN-specification packaging performance level, maximum shipping quantities, and eligibility for limited/excepted quantity provisions.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/compliance-regulatory#set",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/packing-group-hazmat",
"sameAs": [],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
},
"dateModified": "2026-08-12T14:57:19",
"inLanguage": "en"
}
