Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Miro Alternatives Pricing: FigJam and Whimsical Compared

Real per-seat FigJam, Whimsical, and Miro pricing compared for teams who find Miro overkill — including whether FigJam is really free with Figma, as of August 2026.

Ask about Miro Alternatives Pricing: FigJam and Whimsical Compared

Answers are drawn from this guide and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

If you searched “FigJam pricing,” there’s a decent chance you’re not actually shopping for FigJam — you’re evaluating whiteboard tools after finding Miro‘s per-seat cost hard to justify for a small team. That’s a reasonable place to land. Miro is priced for teams that need its full breadth (7,000+ templates, AI workflows, unlimited workspaces at the Business tier), and a lot of teams doing straightforward whiteboarding and flowcharting are paying for capability they don’t use.

This guide compares two lighter, cheaper alternatives — FigJam (bundled into Figma) and Whimsical (flowcharts, boards, and docs) — against Miro on real, current per-seat pricing, so you can see which one actually fits your team’s size and use case.

Editorial disclosure: Some links on this page are CASRAI referral links. If you sign up through one, CASRAI may earn a commission at no extra cost to you — this helps fund our nonprofit mission. We only recommend tools our editorial team has independently researched, and we say plainly where a tool is not the right fit. Read our full disclosure policy →

Tip: try code CASRAI at checkout for 15% off, if the offer is currently active for this program — codes vary by vendor and aren’t guaranteed.

Miro’s pricing, briefly (for comparison)

As of August 2026, Miro’s plans are: Free (3 editable boards, then older boards lock; 7,000+ templates, 250+ integrations); Starter at $8/month per member, billed yearly (unlimited private boards, high-res exports, 25 AI credits/member/month); and Business at $20/month per member, billed yearly (unlimited workspaces and guests, 4,700+ diagramming shapes, AI workflows/agents, 2,000 daily MCP calls). Enterprise is custom-quoted with a 30-member minimum. Monthly (non-annual) billing runs higher than these annual rates. For the full tier-by-tier breakdown, see our separate Miro pricing guide.

See Miro pricing →

FigJam pricing: is it included free with a Figma plan?

Yes, and this is the detail most “FigJam pricing” searches are actually looking for. As of August 2026, Figma no longer sells FigJam as a separate product with its own price list — Figma’s own marketing copy states plainly that “FigJam is included with all seats on every plan.” That means:

  • If your team already has any paid Figma seat — Full ($16/mo on Professional, $55/mo on Organization, $90/mo on Enterprise, all per editor) or Dev seat — FigJam boards come with it at no additional cost.
  • Figma’s free Starter plan also includes FigJam access, with the same kind of usage caps Figma applies to free-tier design files.

So the honest answer to “do I need to pay extra for FigJam” is: if your team is a design team already on a paid Figma plan, no — you already have it, and buying Miro on top for the same whiteboarding job is a real, avoidable extra cost stacked on a tool you’re already paying for.

FigJam price per seat if bought standalone

There isn’t a standalone “FigJam-only” product anymore — Figma consolidated to unified, seat-based pricing across Design and FigJam. The closest thing to a standalone FigJam seat is Figma’s Collab seat, meant for people who need to participate in FigJam boards (and comment/view Design files) without a full design seat. As of August 2026, a Collab seat runs $3/month on the Professional plan and $5/month on Organization or Enterprise (annual billing). That’s the realistic per-seat cost for a non-designer — a PM, researcher, or stakeholder — to get FigJam access if nobody on the team already holds a Full or Dev seat.

Whimsical pricing plans and what’s in the free tier

Whimsical is a separate product from Figma/FigJam — flowcharts, wireframes, mind maps, sticky-note boards, and docs in one workspace. As of August 2026, its plans are:

  • Free — $0/month per editor. Up to 50 board objects and 50 doc blocks created per month, watermarked exports, 7-day version history. Notably, viewers, editors, guests, and workspace members are all unlimited on the free tier — the cap is on creation volume, not headcount.
  • Pro — $10/month per editor (annual billing; ~17% cheaper than paying monthly). Removes the board-object/doc-block caps and the watermark, and extends version history to 90 days.
  • Business — $20/month per editor (annual billing). Adds SAML SSO, SCIM provisioning, unlimited version history, and priority support — aimed at larger teams with IT/security requirements, not small-team basics.

For a small team doing lightweight diagramming, the free tier is genuinely usable for longer than you’d expect, since it doesn’t cap who can join or view — only how much new content gets created each month.

Whimsical vs Miro cost for a small team

Run the numbers for a 5-person team that mostly needs flowcharts, simple diagrams, and shared docs — no heavy AI workflows, no huge multi-format canvases:

  • Miro Starter: 5 × $8/mo = $40/month ($480/year), annual billing — and Starter doesn’t include Miro’s fuller diagramming shape library or AI workflow features; those require Business at 5 × $20 = $100/month ($1,200/year).
  • Whimsical Pro: 5 × $10/mo = $50/month ($600/year), annual billing, with unlimited board objects/docs from day one.
  • Whimsical Business: 5 × $20/mo = $100/month — identical to Miro Business at the same team size.

The honest comparison isn’t “Whimsical always wins on price” — at the entry tier, Miro Starter ($8/seat) is actually cheaper per seat than Whimsical Pro ($10/seat). The real difference is what each entry tier gets you: Miro Starter is a trimmed-down version of a much larger canvas tool, while Whimsical Pro is the full product with nothing held back except SSO/SCIM. A small team doing only basic flowcharts and docs is usually better served by Whimsical’s simpler plan — you’re not paying for (or working around) Miro’s larger surface area you won’t use. A team that expects to grow into Miro’s wider diagramming library, AI workflows, or multi-format boards (Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban) may find Miro Business a better long-run fit despite the higher entry cost, because it avoids a later re-platforming.

Try Miro free →

Who should NOT switch away from Miro

Neither FigJam nor Whimsical is a drop-in replacement for everything Miro does, and it’s worth being direct about when switching is the wrong call:

  • Teams that already live in Miro’s larger canvas and template library. Miro’s 7,000+ templates and 4,700+ diagramming shapes (Business tier) cover far more ground than FigJam’s whiteboard tools or Whimsical’s flowchart/doc set. If your workflows depend on that breadth, migrating loses more than it saves.
  • Teams already using Miro’s AI workflows/agents or its 2,000+ daily MCP calls for tool integrations. Neither FigJam nor Whimsical currently matches that depth of AI-workflow tooling.
  • Teams over ~30 people considering Miro Enterprise. At that scale, Miro’s centralized admin, regional data hosting, and AI governance controls solve real procurement/security requirements that a small-team pricing comparison doesn’t capture — get a custom quote rather than defaulting to a per-seat alternative.
  • Teams with no Figma seat at all and no design workflow. FigJam’s “it’s free with your plan” advantage only applies if you’re already paying for Figma Design. If you’re not, you’d be adopting an entirely new product (plus its own seat cost) just to get a whiteboard — at that point, compare Whimsical or Miro Starter directly instead.

FAQ

Do you need a separate FigJam license if you already pay for Figma?

No. As of August 2026, FigJam is included with every Figma seat type on every plan — Free/Starter, Professional, Organization, and Enterprise. There’s no separate FigJam subscription to add. The only scenario where you’d pay anything FigJam-specific is adding a Collab seat ($3-5/month) for someone who needs FigJam access but doesn’t otherwise need a Full or Dev design seat.

Is Whimsical enough for workshops or only lightweight diagramming?

It depends on the workshop. Whimsical covers flowcharts, mind maps, sticky-note boards, wireframes, and docs in one connected workspace, which is enough for most planning sessions, retros, and process-mapping workshops. What it doesn’t have is Miro’s facilitation-specific features (timers, voting, and video-call integrations built for running a live large-group session) or Miro’s much larger third-party template library. For a small team’s internal working sessions, Whimsical is usually enough; for facilitated workshops with dozens of participants or a need for Miro’s specific facilitation toolkit, Miro’s Starter or Business tier is the safer choice.

Bottom line

If your team already pays for Figma, FigJam gives you whiteboarding at effectively zero marginal cost — there’s rarely a good reason to add Miro on top for the same job. If you don’t use Figma and just need flowcharts, simple diagrams, and shared docs for a small team, Whimsical’s $10/month Pro plan (or its usable free tier) is typically the better fit than Miro’s entry-level plan. Miro still earns its higher price for teams that need its larger template library, heavier AI workflows, or dedicated live-facilitation tools — if that’s your team, the numbers above should help you check whether Starter or Business is the right tier rather than defaulting to the top plan.

Compare Miro plans →

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 44,322 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.