Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0

CRediT adoption

PLOS

PLOS mandates structured CRediT contributor statements on every submission. The publisher has been a CRediT pioneer and reference implementer since 2016, with role matrices fully integrated into the Editorial Manager...

NativeAdopted 2016~12 journalsAries Editorial Manager

Overview

Where PLOS stands on CRediT

PLOS mandates structured CRediT contributor statements on every submission. The publisher has been a CRediT pioneer and reference implementer since 2016, with role matrices fully integrated into the Editorial Manager flow and the published article.

Scope: Mandatory across all PLOS journals

Implementation details

How CRediT is captured and produced

Submission systemAries Editorial Manager
JATS implementationProduction-grade JATS <role vocab="credit"> output as a reference implementation of CRediT; per-author per-role capture; deposited to Crossref and DataCite.
Production workflowPLOS uses the CRediT matrix as part of every articles structured contribution section, with JATS XML and Crossref deposit treating the role assignments as first-class metadata. The PLOS approach is widely cited as a model for other publishers.

For authors

Author guidance — submitting to a PLOS journal

When submitting to a PLOS journal, the CRediT role matrix is a mandatory part of the submission. Each author must have at least one CRediT role; the corresponding author must have an ORCID iD. The matrix is reviewed at acceptance.

For general CRediT submission guidance across publishers, see CRediT for authors.

Sample journals

Representative PLOS titles with CRediT capture

  • PLOS ONE
  • PLOS Biology
  • PLOS Medicine
  • PLOS Computational Biology
  • PLOS Pathogens
  • PLOS Genetics

Adoption history

Notable milestones

PLOS was among the very first publishers to make CRediT mandatory across an entire portfolio (2016) and has remained a leading voice for structured contribution reporting in scholarly publishing.

Notes

Caveats and context

PLOS pairs CRediT with mandatory data-availability statements and an open-publication-by-default model (CC BY) across all titles.

Frequently asked

Common questions about PLOS and CRediT

Does PLOS require CRediT contributor statements?
Yes. PLOS captures structured CRediT statements as part of its standard submission flow. PLOS mandates structured CRediT contributor statements on every submission. The publisher has been a CRediT pioneer and reference implementer since 2016, with role matrices fully integrated into the Editorial Manager flow and the published article.
Which PLOS journals support CRediT?
Representative PLOS titles known to support structured CRediT capture include PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Medicine. Scope: Mandatory across all PLOS journals. Check the individual journals author instructions to confirm the current contributor-roles policy.
How do I add CRediT to my PLOS submission?
When submitting to a PLOS journal, the CRediT role matrix is a mandatory part of the submission. Each author must have at least one CRediT role; the corresponding author must have an ORCID iD. The matrix is reviewed at acceptance.
What submission system does PLOS use for CRediT capture?
PLOS uses Aries Editorial Manager. Production-grade JATS <role vocab="credit"> output as a reference implementation of CRediT; per-author per-role capture; deposited to Crossref and DataCite.
When did PLOS adopt CRediT?
PLOS adopted CRediT around 2016. PLOS was among the very first publishers to make CRediT mandatory across an entire portfolio (2016) and has remained a leading voice for structured contribution reporting in scholarly publishing.

References

Sources

  • PLOS authorship and contributorship policy
  • Brand et al. (2015) — Beyond authorship, Learned Publishing

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →