Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0

CRediT adoption

Royal Society of Chemistry

Per RSC’s own author-responsibilities page (rsc.org): "We strongly recommend you use CRediT... for standardised contribution descriptions." RSC announced a June 2020 "framework for action" committing to routinely...

AvailableAdopted 2020~50 journalsScholarOne Manuscripts

Overview

Where Royal Society of Chemistry stands on CRediT

Per RSC’s own author-responsibilities page (rsc.org): "We strongly recommend you use CRediT... for standardised contribution descriptions." RSC announced a June 2020 "framework for action" committing to routinely published author-contribution statements, but CASRAI found no primary source confirming CRediT itself is mandatory rather than strongly recommended.

Scope: Strongly recommended across RSC journals as part of a June 2020 "framework for action" on transparency; not a mandatory requirement

Implementation details

How CRediT is captured and produced

Submission systemScholarOne Manuscripts
JATS implementationNot independently confirmed as structured JATS capture. RSC’s own author-responsibilities page states: "We strongly recommend you use CRediT (the Contributor Roles Taxonomy) for standardised contribution descriptions" — a recommendation, not a documented mandatory structured-metadata pipeline.
Production workflowNot independently confirmed. CASRAI found no primary source describing a structured JATS/Crossref deposit pipeline specifically for CRediT roles at RSC beyond the recommended-statement guidance.

For authors

Author guidance — submitting to a Royal Society of Chemistry journal

When submitting to an RSC journal, you are strongly encouraged — not required — to use the CRediT taxonomy for your author-contributions statement.

For general CRediT submission guidance across publishers, see CRediT for authors.

Sample journals

Representative Royal Society of Chemistry titles with CRediT capture

  • Chemical Science
  • Chemical Society Reviews
  • Analyst
  • Lab on a Chip
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • RSC Advances

Adoption history

Notable milestones

Corrected 2026-07-16: RSC’s own author-responsibilities page uses "strongly recommend," not "require," for CRediT. RSC’s June 2020 framework for action committed to publishing author-contribution statements portfolio-wide, which likely anchors the 2020 date, but this is a recommendation-level commitment rather than the "Native"/mandatory status this page previously stated.

Notes

Caveats and context

Status corrected 2026-07-16 after reviewing RSC’s own author-responsibilities page, which frames CRediT as a strong recommendation rather than a submission requirement.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Royal Society of Chemistry and CRediT

Does Royal Society of Chemistry require CRediT contributor statements?
Royal Society of Chemistry supports CRediT but does not require it across the whole portfolio. Per RSC’s own author-responsibilities page (rsc.org): "We strongly recommend you use CRediT... for standardised contribution descriptions." RSC announced a June 2020 "framework for action" committing to routinely published author-contribution statements, but CASRAI found no primary source confirming CRediT itself is mandatory rather than strongly recommended. Many titles encourage structured capture without mandating it.
Which Royal Society of Chemistry journals support CRediT?
Representative Royal Society of Chemistry titles known to support structured CRediT capture include Chemical Science, Chemical Society Reviews, Analyst. Scope: Strongly recommended across RSC journals as part of a June 2020 "framework for action" on transparency; not a mandatory requirement. Check the individual journals author instructions to confirm the current contributor-roles policy.
How do I add CRediT to my Royal Society of Chemistry submission?
When submitting to an RSC journal, you are strongly encouraged — not required — to use the CRediT taxonomy for your author-contributions statement.
What submission system does Royal Society of Chemistry use for CRediT capture?
Royal Society of Chemistry uses ScholarOne Manuscripts. Not independently confirmed as structured JATS capture. RSC’s own author-responsibilities page states: "We strongly recommend you use CRediT (the Contributor Roles Taxonomy) for standardised contribution descriptions" — a recommendation, not a documented mandatory structured-metadata pipeline.
When did Royal Society of Chemistry adopt CRediT?
Royal Society of Chemistry adopted CRediT around 2020. Corrected 2026-07-16: RSC’s own author-responsibilities page uses "strongly recommend," not "require," for CRediT. RSC’s June 2020 framework for action committed to publishing author-contribution statements portfolio-wide, which likely anchors the 2020 date, but this is a recommendation-level commitment rather than the "Native"/mandatory status this page previously stated.

References

Sources

  • RSC — Author responsibilities (rsc.org): "We strongly recommend you use CRediT..."
  • RSC author and reviewer hub

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →