Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0

CRediT adoption

Taylor & Francis

Taylor & Francis supports CRediT on a per-journal opt-in basis across its very broad portfolio. STEM and biomedical titles are more likely to require structured capture; many humanities and social-sciences titles...

Variable~2,700 journalsScholarOne Manuscripts (most journals); Editorial Manager (some)

Overview

Where Taylor & Francis stands on CRediT

Taylor & Francis supports CRediT on a per-journal opt-in basis across its very broad portfolio. STEM and biomedical titles are more likely to require structured capture; many humanities and social-sciences titles retain narrative author-contribution statements.

Scope: Per-journal opt-in across the Taylor & Francis / Routledge portfolio

Implementation details

How CRediT is captured and produced

Submission systemScholarOne Manuscripts (most journals); Editorial Manager (some)
JATS implementationWhere adopted, ScholarOne CRediT capture; standard JATS <role vocab="credit"> output in production XML; CRediT deposited to Crossref.
Production workflowFor journals that adopt CRediT, the roles flow through ScholarOne into the production XML and into Crossref deposits for the article DOI.

For authors

Author guidance — submitting to a Taylor & Francis journal

Before submitting to a Taylor & Francis / Routledge journal, check the specific journals author-services page for the contributor-roles policy. Where CRediT is captured, complete the role assignment for each contributor during the ScholarOne submission steps.

For general CRediT submission guidance across publishers, see CRediT for authors.

Sample journals

Representative Taylor & Francis titles with CRediT capture

  • The Annals of the American Association of Geographers
  • Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Educational Psychologist
  • Climate Policy

Adoption history

Notable milestones

Taylor & Francis has progressively widened CRediT coverage across the portfolio in line with the wider scholarly-publisher cohort, particularly across STEM-leaning Taylor & Francis Online titles.

Notes

Caveats and context

The very-large humanities and social-sciences Routledge portfolio retains substantial narrative-only contribution statements; coverage is uneven and journal-by-journal.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Taylor & Francis and CRediT

Does Taylor & Francis require CRediT contributor statements?
It depends on the journal. Taylor & Francis supports CRediT on a per-journal opt-in basis. Taylor & Francis supports CRediT on a per-journal opt-in basis across its very broad portfolio. STEM and biomedical titles are more likely to require structured capture; many humanities and social-sciences titles retain narrative author-contribution statements.
Which Taylor & Francis journals support CRediT?
Representative Taylor & Francis titles known to support structured CRediT capture include The Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Journal of Sports Sciences, Aging & Mental Health. Scope: Per-journal opt-in across the Taylor & Francis / Routledge portfolio. Check the individual journals author instructions to confirm the current contributor-roles policy.
How do I add CRediT to my Taylor & Francis submission?
Before submitting to a Taylor & Francis / Routledge journal, check the specific journals author-services page for the contributor-roles policy. Where CRediT is captured, complete the role assignment for each contributor during the ScholarOne submission steps.
What submission system does Taylor & Francis use for CRediT capture?
Taylor & Francis uses ScholarOne Manuscripts (most journals); Editorial Manager (some). Where adopted, ScholarOne CRediT capture; standard JATS <role vocab="credit"> output in production XML; CRediT deposited to Crossref.
When did Taylor & Francis adopt CRediT?
Taylor & Francis has not made a single portfolio-wide CRediT-adoption announcement; coverage has expanded steadily on a per-journal basis. Taylor & Francis has progressively widened CRediT coverage across the portfolio in line with the wider scholarly-publisher cohort, particularly across STEM-leaning Taylor & Francis Online titles.

References

Sources

  • Taylor & Francis author services — editorial policies

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →