Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AProposedv2026.2

Scoping review

A literature review that maps the breadth and nature of evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where, and in what form — using systematic search methods but without typically appraising study quality or synthesising effect estimates, following PRISMA-ScR.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 5 Sept 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Scoping review

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A scoping review mapping all qualitative studies on AI use in radiology workflows over 2018-2024

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A focused systematic review of one intervention's effects is not a scoping review (it is a systematic review)

Editorial commentary

A scoping review maps the breadth and nature of the evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where it was published, and in what form — using systematic search methods, but without typically appraising individual study quality or attempting to synthesise effect estimates. It follows PRISMA-ScR (the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews), which uses a PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framing rather than the PICO framing common in systematic reviews of interventions.

How this differs from a systematic review

The two answer structurally different questions: a scoping review answers “what evidence exists on this topic, and where?”, while a systematic review answers a focused question such as “does this intervention work?” and involves formal appraisal of study quality that a scoping review typically omits. Scoping reviews are frequently conducted as a precursor step, to determine whether a full systematic review is feasible and worthwhile, or as a standalone output when the underlying question is genuinely descriptive rather than evaluative. Notably, PROSPERO — the prospective register most systematic reviews use — explicitly excludes scoping reviews from eligibility for registration, regardless of topic.

Example

A scoping review mapping the qualitative literature on a given technology’s use within a specific clinical or research workflow across a defined date range, cataloguing study designs and settings without pooling any outcomes.

Also known as

Scoping study · Evidence map

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Scoping review"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "name": "Scoping review",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "description": "A literature review that maps the breadth and nature of evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where, and in what form — using systematic search methods but without typically appraising study quality or synthesising effect estimates, following PRISMA-ScR.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "alternateName": [
    "Scoping study",
    "Evidence map"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:05:51",
  "dateModified": "2026-09-05T17:30:49",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Ask CASRAI · Regulatory Radar

Research-admin question? Get an answer that links its sources.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. Every answer links its sources to check before you act. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.