At application stage
What NIH asks for in proposals
NIH grant applications submitted through eRA Commons via ASSIST or Workspace do not contain a dedicated CRediT field. The Research Plan, Specific Aims, and Research Strategy sections describe the science; the role of each senior or key person is captured in the personnel block and biographical sketches. Contributorship taxonomies have not been adopted in the NIH proposal forms.
Where to embed a CRediT statement
When you reference prior publications from the application team in your Research Strategy or Preliminary Studies, you may briefly note your contribution role using CRediT vocabulary (Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation) to make multi-author authorship transparent. The Multi-PI Leadership Plan, where applicable, is a natural place to spell out who will be responsible for which CRediT-aligned roles during the funded period - particularly useful for reviewers assessing co-PI complementarity.
Sample wording
A sentence such as "Dr. Smith led Conceptualization and Methodology for the prior R01; Dr. Jones contributed Investigation and Data Curation" inside a Multi-PI Leadership Plan reads naturally and gives reviewers a structured view of team complementarity without departing from NIH formatting conventions.
At final-report stage
How CRediT figures in NIH progress and final reports
NIH Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPRs) and final reports collect publication citations and a narrative on accomplishments. The RPPR does not parse CRediT roles as structured fields; publication-layer CRediT statements travel with each citation because PubMed Central ingests the article record.
Does NIH ingest CRediT as structured metadata?
NIH does not currently ingest CRediT as structured grant-reporting metadata. CRediT statements are visible only at the publication layer (via the journal record and, downstream, PubMed Central and ORCID). For NIH-funded papers published from 2025 onward, no-embargo PMC deposit is mandatory; the CRediT statement on the published article flows automatically into the PMC record where the journal supplies it.
Common pitfalls
Things to avoid
- Treating CRediT as an NIH grant requirement when it is not - leading to wasted effort embedding it in proposal sections where it adds no value to reviewers.
- Conflating NIH authorship guidance with ICMJE rules; NIH defers to journal policies and does not impose a separate contributorship taxonomy.
- Omitting the funding-acknowledgement statement in the resulting publication, which can cause NIH compliance issues even when the CRediT statement is complete.
- Forgetting to update the RPPR with publication citations from the funded period - this is the route through which NIH tracks output, independent of CRediT.
- Listing CRediT roles for personnel who do not meet ICMJE authorship criteria on the resulting publication, conflating contributorship with authorship.
Worked example
Sample CRediT statement for a NIH proposal
Illustrative wording (names invented) - adapt to your team and confirm the NIH-specific funding-acknowledgement format current at time of submission.
Frequently asked
NIH + CRediT - common questions
- Does NIH ingest CRediT statements as structured metadata?
- Not at present. NIH collects publication citations through RPPRs and PubMed Central; the CRediT statement is captured at the journal-record layer and is not parsed by NIH grant-management systems.
- Should I include a CRediT statement inside my Research Strategy?
- It is optional. A brief CRediT-aligned sentence within the Multi-PI Leadership Plan or Preliminary Studies can clarify team contribution without burdening reviewers; do not duplicate the full taxonomy across multiple sections.
- Does the NIH biographical sketch require CRediT?
- No. The SciENcv-generated NIH biosketch (Sections A through D) uses its own narrative format. CRediT vocabulary may be useful inside the Contribution to Science section if you want to articulate your specific role on multi-author works.
- What happens to the CRediT statement on my NIH-funded paper once deposited in PMC?
- PubMed Central ingests the article and its metadata as supplied by the publisher. Where the publisher includes CRediT roles in JATS markup, those roles appear in the PMC record and are discoverable through PMC search.
- Can I list a Patient Advisor or community partner using CRediT roles in an NIH context?
- Yes, on the resulting publication if they meet your journal's authorship criteria. For grant reporting, NIH personnel categories are distinct from authorship and follow eRA Commons role definitions.
Related guidance
Where to go next
- NIH funder mandateFull overview of NIH policies, OA, RDM, and submission
- Funder mandate matrixCompare CRediT, OA, and RDM positions across funders
- CRediT for authorsGeneral guidance on writing a CRediT statement at journal submission
- The 14 CRediT rolesReference definitions of every CRediT contributor role








