Direct comparison
AAHRPP vs. AAALAC: Human vs. Animal Research
AAHRPP accredits human research protection programs (IRBs); AAALAC accredits animal care and use programs (IACUCs). Compare scope, process, and standards.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · free to try
Ask about AAHRPP vs. AAALAC: Human vs. Animal Research
Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.
An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.
Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do AAHRPP, AAALAC International compare side by side?
The table below compares AAHRPP, AAALAC International across 8 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it accredits through legally required?.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | AAHRPP | AAALAC International |
|---|---|---|
| What it accredits | An institution's entire Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) | An institution's entire animal care and use program |
| Research population covered | Human research participants | Live vertebrate research animals |
| Institutional committee evaluated | Institutional Review Board(s) (IRB) | Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) |
| Founded | 2001 | 1965 (renamed 1996; current name since 2016) |
| Standards evaluated against | AAHRPP's published accreditation standards (Organization, IRB/Ethics Committee, Researchers and Research Staff domains) | Three Primary Standards: the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the Ag Guide, and European Convention ETS 123 |
| Review cycle | Self-assessment, application, peer document review, site visit, Council on Accreditation decision; recurring reaccreditation | Program Description plus on-site visit roughly every three years, Council on Accreditation decision |
| Underlying mandatory regulation | Common Rule (45 CFR 46) and applicable FDA human-subjects rules | Animal Welfare Act (USDA/APHIS) and PHS Policy (NIH OLAW) |
| Legally required? | No -- voluntary | No -- voluntary |
Common questions
Common questions about AAHRPP vs AAALAC International
Is AAHRPP the animal-research version of AAALAC, or vice versa?
+
No -- they are parallel bodies covering different populations. AAHRPP accredits human research protection programs; AAALAC accredits animal care and use programs. An institution pursues each separately.
Can one office or committee hold both accreditations?
+
Not as a single accreditation. The IRB and IACUC are distinct committees under distinct regulations, and AAHRPP and AAALAC each accredit their respective side independently, though a large institution can hold both at once.
Is either accreditation legally required to conduct research?
+
No. Neither is required by US law or federal funding regulations -- institutions can be fully compliant with the Common Rule or the Animal Welfare Act/PHS Policy without ever seeking accreditation from either body.
