Direct comparison
COPE Authorship Changes: Before vs After
COPE publishes four author-change flowcharts, not two, split by timing. Compare what before vs after publication requires, and when a correction is needed.
Ask about COPE Authorship Changes: Before vs After
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do Before Publication, After Publication compare side by side?
The table below compares Before Publication, After Publication across 9 procurement-relevant dimensions, from governing cope flowcharts through reader-facing record of the change.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Before Publication | After Publication |
|---|---|---|
| Governing COPE flowcharts | (a) Addition of an extra author; (b) Corresponding author requests removal of an author | (c) Request for addition of an extra author; (d) Request for removal of an author (DOI 10.24318/cope.2019.2.11) |
| First editorial step | Clarify the reason for the requested change with the corresponding author | Clarify the reason for the change; for removal, also ask directly whether misconduct is suspected |
| Who must consent | All listed authors, including the author being added or removed | All listed authors, including the author being added or removed |
| Status of the paper while unresolved | Review or publication is suspended until authorship is agreed | The article stays published as-is -- there is no "suspend" option |
| If all authors agree | Author list and contributor details are amended; review or publication proceeds -- no public correction needed | A correction is published |
| If authors disagree | Editor tells the excluded author to resolve it with co-authors or their institution -- the editor does not adjudicate | Addition: case referred to the authors’ institution(s) to adjudicate. Removal: parties may submit letters; COPE allows publishing both, or the minority view, if the majority still disagrees |
| Suspected fraud or misconduct | Not addressed in these two flowcharts | Removal flowchart explicitly routes this to COPE's separate fabricated-data flowchart |
| Typical real-world trigger | A contributor's role is finalized during revision, or a co-author withdraws before submission is complete | An omitted contributor is identified post-publication, or an author requests removal after a falling-out |
| Reader-facing record of the change | None -- the published version simply reflects the final author list | A formal correction notice linked to the original article |
Common questions
Common questions about Before Publication vs After Publication
Are there really only two COPE authorship-change flowcharts?
+
No. COPE publishes four flowcharts in its "Changes in authorship" series -- separate ones for adding and removing an author, before and after publication. The useful two-way split is by timing, since that's what determines whether a published correction is required.
Does adding an author after publication always require a correction notice?
+
COPE's flowchart for post-publication addition says to publish a correction once all authors agree, and to publish one if required by the institution after adjudication -- so in practice, some form of correction is the expected outcome once the change is resolved.
Can an editor add or remove an author without every co-author's agreement?
+
No, in either the before- or after-publication flowcharts. COPE's guidance requires written consent from all listed authors, including the person being added or removed, before an editor proceeds.
What happens if authors can't agree on a pre-publication authorship change?
+
COPE’s flowchart says to suspend review or publication of the paper until authorship is agreed, and to tell the excluded author to resolve the disagreement with co-authors or their institution rather than the editor.
