Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
CASRAIRegulatory RadarNever miss a regulatory change that affects your research officeA daily digest of new regulatory and compliance content, plus 150 questions/day to Ask CASRAI. Built for research administrators and compliance officers.See Regulatory Radar CASRAI · Own product

Direct comparison

Laboratory Accreditation Bodies Compared

Who accredits medical laboratories: CAP, Joint Commission, COLA, ANAB (ISO 15189), AABB, and state/CMS survey compared for procurement and vendor evaluation.

Ask about Laboratory Accreditation Bodies Compared

Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

How do CAP, Joint Commission, COLA, ANAB (ISO 15189), AABB, State Agency / CMS Direct compare side by side?

The table below compares CAP, Joint Commission, COLA, ANAB (ISO 15189), AABB, State Agency / CMS Direct across 6 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it accredits against through how to verify.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionCAPJoint CommissionCOLAANAB (ISO 15189)AABBState Agency / CMS Direct
What it accredits againstCAP's own discipline-specific checklistsJoint Commission laboratory standardsCOLA's own accreditation standardsISO 15189 (international medical lab standard)AABB Standards for blood banks/transfusion servicesCLIA regulations (42 CFR 493) directly
Confers CLIA "deemed status"YesYesYesYesSpecific to blood bank/transfusion scopeN/A — this is the direct-survey pathway itself
Typical lab typeHospital and large independent labsHospital labs, usually alongside hospital-wide surveyPhysician-office labs, smaller independent labsAny medical lab seeking ISO 15189 / international recognitionBlood banks, transfusion services, cellular therapyAny lab that opts for (or is required into) direct survey
Inspection modelPeer inspection by practicing lab professionalsJoint Commission surveyorsCOLA surveyorsANAB assessors against ISO 15189 clausesAABB assessorsState health agency surveyor; CMS validation survey oversight
International recognitionPrimarily US-focusedPrimarily US-focusedPrimarily US-focusedILAC MRA signatory — internationally recognizedPrimarily US-focused, some international programsUS regulatory pathway only
How to verifyAccreditation status/checklist scope from CAPJoint Commission accreditation verificationAccreditation status from COLAISO 15189 scope certificate from ANABAccreditation status from AABBCurrent CLIA certificate from the lab / CMS

Common questions

Common questions about CAP vs Joint Commission vs COLA vs ANAB (ISO 15189) vs AABB vs State Agency / CMS Direct

Who accredits medical laboratories in the United States?

+

No single body does. CMS administers CLIA certification, the legal requirement every US medical laboratory must hold. Labs satisfy the CLIA survey requirement either through direct survey by their state health agency, or through accreditation by a CMS-recognized private accreditor — CAP, the Joint Commission, COLA, and ANAB (via ISO 15189) are the main ones for general clinical laboratory work, with AABB covering blood banking and transfusion services specifically.

Is CLIA certification the same as CAP or COLA accreditation?

+

No. CLIA certification is the underlying federal requirement administered by CMS. CAP and COLA accreditation are two of several ways a lab can satisfy the inspection component of that requirement ("deemed status") instead of being surveyed directly by its state agency. A lab needs a CLIA certificate regardless of which, if any, private accreditor it uses.

Does ISO 15189 accreditation satisfy CLIA requirements?

+

Yes — a US clinical laboratory can reach CLIA deemed status through ISO 15189 accreditation from ANAB, as an alternative to CAP, Joint Commission, or COLA accreditation. ISO 15189 additionally carries international recognition through ANAB's ILAC MRA signatory status, which the other US-focused accreditors do not provide.

How do I verify a reference laboratory's accreditation before contracting with them?

+

Confirm both currency and scope: check directly with the named accreditor (CAP, Joint Commission, COLA, ANAB, or AABB) that the accreditation is active rather than relying on a vendor's own claim, and request the specific accredited scope (test menu or checklist areas) for the work you're contracting, since accreditation is granted by scope rather than as a blanket institutional credential.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →