Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us
Dictionary termTrack AProposedv2026.1

Chi-Square Test (χ²)

A hypothesis test for categorical data that compares observed category counts to the counts expected under a null hypothesis — either testing whether two categorical variables are independent (chi-square test of independence) or whether one categorical variable's observed distribution matches a specified expected distribution (goodness-of-fit). Distinct from t-tests and ANOVA, which test differences in a continuous outcome's mean rather than differences in categorical counts.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Jul 2026

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    Testing whether treatment group (drug vs. placebo) and outcome (improved vs. not improved) are associated, using a 2×2 contingency table of observed counts — a chi-square test of independence.

  • Is an instance

    Testing whether observed counts across four categories match an expected 25/25/25/25 split — a chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Comparing mean blood pressure (a continuous outcome) across three treatment arms is not a chi-square problem — that calls for ANOVA (three or more groups) or a t-test (two groups), since chi-square only applies to categorical/count data.

Editorial commentary

Operational definition

A chi-square test (χ², Pearson’s chi-square) is a hypothesis test for categorical data: it compares observed counts in a set of categories against the counts you would expect under a stated null hypothesis, and asks whether the difference is larger than random sampling variation alone would produce. There are two common forms, and a dataset only qualifies as a fit for either if the outcome being analysed is genuinely categorical (nominal or ordinal counts), not a continuous measurement:

  • Chi-square test of independence — tests whether two categorical variables are associated with each other, using a contingency (cross-tab) table of observed counts. Degrees of freedom: (rows − 1) × (columns − 1).
  • Chi-square goodness-of-fit test — tests whether the observed distribution of a single categorical variable matches a specified expected distribution (e.g. equal proportions, or a theoretical ratio). Degrees of freedom: (number of categories − 1).

Both forms use the same test statistic, summed across every cell: χ² = ∑ (O − E)² / E, where O is the observed count in a cell and E is the count expected under the null hypothesis. A large χ² value (and correspondingly small p-value) indicates the observed counts diverge from what the null hypothesis predicts.

Worked example: test of independence

Illustrative example: a researcher surveys 200 study participants and cross-tabulates two categorical variables — treatment group (drug vs. placebo) and outcome (improved vs. not improved) — into a 2×2 contingency table. The chi-square test of independence compares the observed cell counts to the counts that would be expected if treatment and outcome were statistically independent. A significant result (typically p < .05) supports reporting an association between treatment and outcome; it does not by itself establish the size or direction of that association — that’s what an effect size measure such as Cramér’s V or an odds ratio is for.

Worked example: goodness-of-fit

Illustrative example: a researcher records the category (A, B, C, D) that 120 observations fall into and wants to know whether the observed split matches an expected 25/25/25/25 distribution across the four categories. The goodness-of-fit test compares each category’s observed count to the expected count of 30, summing (O − E)² / E across all four categories to produce the test statistic, with 3 degrees of freedom.

Assumptions and when the test breaks down

  • Categorical data. Both variables (independence test) or the single variable (goodness-of-fit) must be nominal or ordinal counts, not continuous measurements.
  • Independent observations. Each observation contributes to exactly one cell; the test is not valid for repeated or matched measurements on the same subjects (McNemar’s test handles paired categorical data instead).
  • Expected cell counts. The chi-square approximation is unreliable when expected cell counts are too small — the conventional rule of thumb is that no more than 20% of cells should have an expected count below 5, and no cell should have an expected count of 0. For small 2×2 tables that violate this, Fisher’s exact test is the standard alternative; Yates’ continuity correction is sometimes applied to 2×2 tables to reduce overstatement of significance.

Counter-example: when chi-square is the wrong test

Comparing mean blood pressure across three treatment arms is not a chi-square problem, even though it involves comparing groups — blood pressure is a continuous outcome, so the comparison calls for ANOVA (three or more groups) or a t-test (two groups), not a chi-square test. A useful shortcut when choosing a test: if the outcome variable is a count or category, chi-square is a candidate; if the outcome is a continuous measurement, it isn’t — t-tests and ANOVA are built for that case instead.

Reporting in a manuscript

Standard reporting for a chi-square result states the statistic, degrees of freedom, sample size, and p-value, e.g. χ²(1, N = 200) = 8.42, p = .004. Reviewers and journal statistical checklists typically expect the contingency table (or category counts) to be reported alongside the test statistic, not the test statistic alone, so a reader can evaluate the direction and size of any association independently of statistical significance.

Related terms

  • ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) — the corresponding test for comparing means of a continuous outcome across groups.
  • Descriptive Statistics vs. Inferential Statistics — chi-square is an inferential test built on top of descriptive contingency-table counts.
  • Effect Size — a significant chi-square result should be paired with an effect size (Cramér’s V, phi coefficient) to convey magnitude, not just significance.
  • Experimental Design — whether a chi-square test is appropriate is determined at the design stage, by what type of outcome variable the study collects.

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Chi-Square Test (χ²)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/chi-square-test" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/chi-square-test",
  "name": "Chi-Square Test (χ²)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/chi-square-test",
  "description": "A hypothesis test for categorical data that compares observed category counts to the counts expected under a null hypothesis — either testing whether two categorical variables are independent (chi-square test of independence) or whether one categorical variable's observed distribution matches a specified expected distribution (goodness-of-fit). Distinct from t-tests and ANOVA, which test differences in a continuous outcome's mean rather than differences in categorical counts.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/chi-square-test",
  "sameAs": [],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "dateModified": "2026-07-23T06:37:54",
  "inLanguage": "en"
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →