Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack BProposedv2026.1

FAIR-Aware

FAIR-Aware is a free, self-guided online self-assessment questionnaire developed by DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services, the Netherlands) to help researchers and data stewards gauge their own understanding of, and their dataset's likely alignment with, the FAIR Data Principles before depositing data in a repository. It was developed and refined through the FAIRsFAIR EU project, and its assessment metrics are built substantially on the indicators separately developed by the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group — so a FAIR-Aware score gives a rough, self-reported proxy for how a dataset would likely perform against that more granular indicator set, without requiring the technical setup an automated tool needs.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 5 Sept 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about FAIR-Aware

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim. When our sources don't cover a question, it says so.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A doctoral researcher completes the FAIR-Aware questionnaire before submitting a dataset to a repository as part of a funder's data management plan requirement, and uses the results to identify specific gaps — for example, a missing persistent identifier or an unclear reuse licence — that still need attention before deposit.

  • Is an instance

    A university research data service links to FAIR-Aware from its DMP guidance as a first, low-friction awareness step, before pointing researchers toward a more rigorous automated assessment for datasets that will be formally certified.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    FAIR-Aware is a manual self-assessment based on the researcher's own answers to a questionnaire, not an automated technical check of a live dataset or repository — it should not be confused with F-UJI , a separate tool that programmatically tests a resolvable dataset URL or DOI against machine-checkable FAIR metrics.

Editorial commentary

FAIR-Aware is a free, self-guided online questionnaire developed by DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services, the Netherlands) that helps researchers and data stewards assess their own understanding of, and their dataset’s likely alignment with, the FAIR Data Principles before depositing data in a repository.

Origin and how it’s built

FAIR-Aware was developed and refined through the FAIRsFAIR EU project. Its underlying metrics draw substantially on the indicators separately developed by the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, so completing FAIR-Aware gives a rough proxy for how a dataset is likely to score against that more detailed indicator set — useful as an early, low-friction check before a more formal assessment.

Self-assessment, not automated testing

FAIR-Aware works by asking the researcher a structured series of questions about their own dataset and practices, and scoring the answers — it depends on the researcher’s own knowledge and honesty, not on machine-testing a live, resolvable dataset. That distinguishes it from F-UJI, a separate automated tool that takes an actual dataset identifier (a DOI or URL) and programmatically checks it against machine-testable FAIR metrics. A research office might reasonably use both: FAIR-Aware early, as a teaching and awareness tool for researchers who haven’t yet deposited data, and an automated tool such as F-UJI later, once a dataset actually has a resolvable identifier to test.

Typical use

FAIR-Aware is most often pointed to from data management plan guidance, as a first practical step for a researcher trying to work out what “make your data FAIR” concretely requires of them before choosing a repository and metadata standard.

Related terms

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="FAIR-Aware"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/fair-aware" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/fair-aware",
  "name": "FAIR-Aware",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/fair-aware",
  "description": "FAIR-Aware is a free, self-guided online self-assessment questionnaire developed by DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services, the Netherlands) to help researchers and data stewards gauge their own understanding of, and their dataset's likely alignment with, the FAIR Data Principles before depositing data in a repository. It was developed and refined through the FAIRsFAIR EU project, and its assessment metrics are built substantially on the indicators separately developed by the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group — so a FAIR-Aware score gives a rough, self-reported proxy for how a dataset would likely perform against that more granular indicator set, without requiring the technical setup an automated tool needs.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/data-infrastructure#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/fair-aware",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-08-22T09:45:46",
  "dateModified": "2026-09-05T17:43:40",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Ask this page a question. Get answers citing the rule.

Ask about your own case — the exception, the edge case, the two rules that conflict. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after, cancel anytime.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.