Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A paper reporting that a candidate drug showed no effect on the primary outcome in a well-powered trial
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A paper reporting a small p > 0.05 finding spun as 'a trend toward significance' is not honest negative-result reporting
Editorial commentary
Negative-result publication is a counter-measure to publication bias. Some journals (Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine, PLOS One’s commitment to publishing on methodological soundness regardless of result direction) explicitly welcome them. Registered reports also enable negative-result publication by design.
References
- Dirnagl 2010 ‘Why publish negative results?’ Translational Stroke Research
- PLOS One editorial criteria
Also known as
Negative findings paper · Failed-replication paper
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Negative result paper"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/negative-result-paper" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"name": "Negative result paper",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/negative-result-paper",
"description": "A peer-reviewed publication whose primary finding is that a tested hypothesis was not supported, an intervention did not produce the predicted effect, or an expected relationship was not observed, framed as a contribution to evidence rather than as a failure.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs-expanded/",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/negative-result-paper",
"sameAs": [
"Negative findings paper",
"Failed-replication paper"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}







