Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AProposedv2026.2

Stage-2 results paper

The completed registered report submitted after data collection, containing the results, discussion, and any exploratory (clearly labelled) analyses beyond the pre-registered plan, peer-reviewed only for adherence to the Stage 1 protocol and quality of conclusions — not for the direction of findings.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Stage-2 results paper

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A Stage 2 publication reporting a null effect, accepted because the Stage 1 protocol was followed

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A paper that was not preceded by Stage 1 acceptance is not a Stage 2 results paper, regardless of its quality

Editorial commentary

A Stage-2 results paper is the completed manuscript submitted after data collection under a Registered Reports arrangement — containing the actual results, discussion, and any exploratory analyses that go beyond the pre-registered plan, clearly labelled as exploratory rather than confirmatory. Its peer review is deliberately narrow: reviewers check adherence to the accepted Stage 1 protocol and the soundness of the conclusions drawn — not whether the results themselves are positive, novel, or statistically significant. A Stage 2 paper cannot legitimately be rejected because its findings were null or unexpected, since the in-principle acceptance granted at Stage 1 is a binding commitment.

How this differs from Stage 1 and from ordinary results papers

Unlike a conventional results paper, a Stage 2 submission’s acceptance was already substantially decided before the data existed — the Stage 1 review is where the scientific gatekeeping happened. Deviations from the registered Stage 1 plan must be transparently disclosed, and any additional analyses not specified in advance must be clearly flagged as exploratory so readers can distinguish confirmatory from post-hoc findings.

Example

A Stage 2 publication reporting a statistically null primary result, accepted for publication because the accepted Stage 1 protocol was followed faithfully — a direct structural counter-measure to publication bias against null findings.

Also known as

Stage 2 RR · RR Stage 2

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Stage-2 results paper"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "name": "Stage-2 results paper",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "description": "The completed registered report submitted after data collection, containing the results, discussion, and any exploratory (clearly labelled) analyses beyond the pre-registered plan, peer-reviewed only for adherence to the Stage 1 protocol and quality of conclusions — not for the direction of findings.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "alternateName": [
    "Stage 2 RR",
    "RR Stage 2"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:04:23",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:29:12",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Ask CASRAI · Regulatory Radar

Research-admin question? Get an answer that links its sources.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. Every answer links its sources to check before you act. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.