Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack BProposedv2026.1

ORCID Peer Review Record

An ORCID peer review record is an entry in the Peer Review section of a researcher's ORCID record documenting that they reviewed for a named journal, publisher, funder, or other convening organization -- carrying a group tag identifying that organization, a review type, a completion date, and, optionally, external identifiers. Unlike Works, Employment, or Education entries, a researcher cannot type a peer review record into their own ORCID profile directly: it can only be added via the ORCID Member API by a trusted organization, and only after the researcher signs in to ORCID and explicitly authorizes that organization to write to their record.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 5 Sept 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about ORCID Peer Review Record

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim. When our sources don't cover a question, it says so.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A journal's editorial system pushes a peer review record to a reviewer's ORCID record via the ORCID Member API after the reviewer completes a review and grants permission during sign-in -- the record then shows a verified group tag for the journal's publisher, a review type, and a completion date, without disclosing the content of the review itself.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A researcher who manually types 'Reviewer for Journal X, 2026' into the free-text Works section of their own ORCID profile has not created a verified Peer Review record -- it lacks the API-sourced group tag and will not display with ORCID's source-verification marking, since it was self-entered rather than pushed by the convening organization.

Editorial commentary

ORCID’s Peer Review section exists specifically to give reviewers verifiable credit for review activity that is otherwise invisible on a CV — but, unlike most other ORCID record sections, it is deliberately not self-enterable.

How a record gets added

Per ORCID’s own integration documentation: “Peer review items can only be added by the API; the user is not able to enter new items in this section.” A trusted organization — the journal, publisher, funder, or an authorized third-party recognition service — pushes the entry via the ORCID Member API, and only after the reviewer signs in to ORCID and explicitly authorizes that organization to write to their record.

What the record contains

Entries are grouped under a group tag identifying the convening journal, publisher, or organization, and carry a completion date, a review type, and optional external identifiers — typically without disclosing the review’s content, preserving reviewer anonymity where the journal’s process requires it.

Third-party recognition services

The Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service (Clarivate’s current name for what was previously Publons) is a common intermediary: review organizers work with it to log and verify review activity, and reviewers can opt in to have verified review history auto-exported to their ORCID record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I add a peer review I did to my own ORCID record?

Not directly — only the convening organization (via the ORCID Member API, with your authorization) can add it. If a journal you reviewed for doesn’t push ORCID records, ask its editorial office whether it supports this, or whether it works with a recognition service that does.

Does a Peer Review record reveal what I wrote in the review?

No — the record documents that a review occurred (organization, type, date), not its content, which keeps it compatible with single- and double-anonymous review processes.

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="ORCID Peer Review Record"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/orcid-peer-review-record" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/orcid-peer-review-record",
  "name": "ORCID Peer Review Record",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/orcid-peer-review-record",
  "description": "An ORCID peer review record is an entry in the Peer Review section of a researcher's ORCID record documenting that they reviewed for a named journal, publisher, funder, or other convening organization -- carrying a group tag identifying that organization, a review type, a completion date, and, optionally, external identifiers. Unlike Works, Employment, or Education entries, a researcher cannot type a peer review record into their own ORCID profile directly: it can only be added via the ORCID Member API by a trusted organization, and only after the researcher signs in to ORCID and explicitly authorizes that organization to write to their record.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/persistent-identifiers#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/orcid-peer-review-record",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-08-22T10:45:25",
  "dateModified": "2026-09-05T17:43:47",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Ask this page a question. Get answers citing the rule.

Ask about your own case — the exception, the edge case, the two rules that conflict. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after, cancel anytime.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.