Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

40 CFR Part 136: Guidelines for Water Analysis

40 CFR Part 136 establishes EPA-approved test procedures, preservation rules, and QA/QC requirements for Clean Water Act wastewater and ambient water testing.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Short Answer

40 CFR Part 136 is the EPA regulation titled Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under Clean Water Act Section 304(h). It establishes legally approved test procedures, container types, preservation rules, maximum holding times, and quality assurance standards required for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits, pretreatment programs, and state water certifications.

Definition and Scope

Promulgated under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 304(h), 33 U.S.C. § 1314(h), 40 CFR Part 136 defines analytical methods mandatory for regulatory filings. Under 40 CFR § 136.1, these guidelines apply to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit applications and compliance monitoring under Section 402, state water certifications under Section 401, monitoring reports under Section 308, and industrial pretreatment standards under Section 307.

The regulation governs physical, chemical, radiological, and biological testing of wastewater discharges, stormwater, and environmental water bodies. Municipal treatment facilities, industrial plants, and commercial testing laboratories submitting regulatory data must use analytical methods codified in Part 136 or authorized through the Alternate Test Procedure (ATP) program.

How It Works and How It Is Used in Practice

40 CFR Part 136 functions as an analytical method framework. The EPA incorporates methods developed by federal agencies and voluntary consensus standards bodies, including the EPA Office of Water, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA/AWWA/WEF), ASTM International, and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Programs like the USGS National Water Information System align ambient water monitoring with these federal guidelines.

In routine practice, testing facilities operate under three primary regulatory mechanisms:

  • Approved Test Procedures (§ 136.3): Laboratories must select an approved procedure from Tables IA through IH for the designated analyte and matrix. Each entry defines the parameter, analytical method citations, and recognized regulatory references.
  • Method Flexibility and Analyst Modifications (§ 136.6): Analysts may modify approved methods to resolve matrix interferences or improve efficiency without prior EPA approval, provided the underlying detector physics and reaction chemistry remain unchanged. Permitted adjustments include altering capillary column dimensions, carrier gas velocity, temperature programs, sample scaling (preserving reagent ratios), and standardized buffer solution recipes. Any modification requires an Initial Demonstration of Capability (IDC) documenting precision and recovery before analyzing client samples.
  • Alternate Test Procedures (§ 136.4 and § 136.5): When an organization uses an unlisted technology or changes a fundamental method mechanism, an ATP approval is required. Section 136.4 covers nationwide ATPs reviewed by the EPA National ATP Coordinator in the Office of Water. Section 136.5 governs limited-use ATPs approved by the EPA Regional Administrator for specific discharge outfalls or unique facility matrices.

Types or Related Concepts

The regulatory foundation of 40 CFR Part 136 is organized into eight pollutant-specific tables and four procedural appendices. Laboratories and environmental facilities must verify that testing protocols conform to the appropriate table:

Regulatory Table Parameter Group Representative Analytes Recognized Method Sources
Table IA Biological Methods Fecal coliform, Escherichia coli, Enterococci, sludge pathogens Standard Methods 9221/9222, EPA 1600/1603
Table IB Inorganic Test Procedures BOD5, CBOD5, COD, TOC, ammonia, nitrate, suspended solids, pH, trace metals EPA 180.1, 200.7, 350.1, Standard Methods 5210B
Table IC Non-Pesticide Organics Volatile aromatics, purgeable halocarbons, base/neutrals, PCBs, dioxins EPA Methods 601–613, 624.1, 625.1, 1613B
Table ID Pesticides Organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides, triazines EPA Methods 608.3, 614, 617
Table IE Radiological Procedures Gross alpha, gross beta, total radium, radium-226/228, strontium-89/90 EPA 900.0, Standard Methods 7110B, USGS R-1181
Table IF Pharmaceutical Pollutants Priority pharmaceuticals, active veterinary and human ingredients EPA Method 1694 (LC-MS/MS), multi-lab validated methods
Table IG Pesticide Active Ingredients Pesticide residue testing, industrial manufacturing effluent EPA 600-series, OPP pesticide registration methods
Table IH Ambient Microorganisms Ambient water enterococci, surface water recreational criteria EPA 1600, Standard Methods 9230B

Four procedural appendices supplement these tables: Appendix A details organic analytical procedures (Methods 601–613, 624.1, 625.1); Appendix B provides the mandatory statistical procedure for calculating the Method Detection Limit (MDL Revision 2); Appendix C specifies trace element determination by ICP-AES Method 200.7; and Appendix D covers filter cake specific resistance.

Where It Matters for Labs, Clinics or Supply Decisions

40 CFR Part 136 establishes technical criteria governing laboratory workflows, equipment investments, and supply management:

Sample Containers, Preservation, and Holding Times (Table II)

Field technicians and laboratories must comply with Table II preservation mandates:

  • The 15-Minute Rule: Grab samples requiring chemical preservation must have preservatives added within 15 minutes of collection.
  • Container Materials: Regulations specify plastic (polyethylene, P), glass (G), or fluoropolymer (FP). Trace organics (Table IC/ID) require amber glass containers with PTFE-lined closures to eliminate photodegradation and plasticizer leaching.
  • Thermal Preservation: Samples must be cooled to ≤ 6 °C (without freezing) immediately after sampling, maintaining that temperature during transit.
  • Holding Time Limits: Maximum holding times range from 15 minutes for pH, dissolved oxygen, and residual chlorine to 48 hours for unpreserved BOD5. Tight BOD holding constraints influence equipment planning, such as evaluating a BOD incubator vs. COD reactor. Conversely, sulfuric-acid preserved COD and ammonia hold for 28 days, and nitric-acid preserved trace metals hold for 6 months (excluding mercury at 28 days).

Mandatory Quality Assurance Elements (§ 136.7)

Section 136.7 mandates twelve core QA/QC elements: demonstration of capability, method blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes, matrix spike duplicates, surrogate spikes for organics, calibration verification, calibration range maintenance, control limits, corrective actions, Appendix B MDL determinations, and complete audit records. Laboratories maintain these audit records within a validated scientific data management system (SDMS).

Furthermore, testing facilities demonstrate analytical reliability through formal equipment qualification, adhering to recognized IQ/OQ/PQ protocols during annual audits and state accreditation inspections.

Common Misunderstandings

Environmental laboratories frequently encounter compliance findings due to common misconceptions:

  • Assuming SW-846 Methods Are Interchangeable: Methods approved under RCRA (SW-846) cannot be substituted for CWA compliance unless explicitly listed in Part 136 or approved via an ATP. For example, using SW-846 Method 8260 instead of EPA 624.1 for an NPDES outfall is a regulatory violation.
  • Overextending § 136.6 Method Flexibility: While analysts may alter chromatography columns or gas flow rates, they cannot modify fundamental detector physics (such as substituting mass spectrometry for atomic absorption) or omit mandatory digestion steps without an approved ATP.
  • Calculating Holding Times from Laboratory Intake: Table II holding times start at the exact moment of grab sample collection in the field, not when sample bottles arrive at the laboratory dock.
  • Treating the MDL as a Static Baseline: Under Appendix B (MDL Revision 2), facilities must recalculate detection limits annually across routine preparation batches, instruments, and method blanks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between 40 CFR Part 136 and EPA SW-846?

40 CFR Part 136 establishes legally mandatory test procedures for Clean Water Act wastewater and surface water monitoring under NPDES permits. EPA SW-846 provides guidance methods for RCRA hazardous waste characterization. SW-846 methods serve primarily as flexible guidance, whereas Part 136 methods are legally binding regulations for wastewater compliance.

Can an environmental laboratory modify a Part 136 method?

Yes, within the boundaries established by 40 CFR § 136.6. Analysts may adjust operational parameters such as carrier gas velocity, column dimensions, and temperature ramps to resolve matrix interferences, provided the fundamental chemistry is unchanged and documented with an Initial Demonstration of Capability.

What happens if a sample exceeds the Table II holding time?

When an environmental sample exceeds the maximum holding time specified in Table II, the analytical data is legally invalid for NPDES compliance reporting. Regulatory authorities may reject the dataset, issue a notice of violation, and mandate re-sampling.

Are PFAS test methods included in 40 CFR Part 136?

The EPA has developed Clean Water Act analytical methods for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, including EPA Method 1633 (targeting 40 PFAS compounds across wastewater, surface water, and biosolids) and Method 1621 (Adsorbable Organic Fluorine). Regulated entities must verify their permit requirements as the EPA formalizes incorporation through periodic Method Update Rules.

Sources

  1. U.S. Government Publishing Office and EPA. eCFR — Title 40, Chapter I, Subchapter D, Part 136: Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, updated 2026. URL: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-136.
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Water Act Analytical Methods. EPA Office of Water, 2026. URL: https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods.
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alternate Test Procedures (ATP) Program. EPA Clean Water Act Methods Program, 2026. URL: https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods/alternate-test-procedures.
  4. Legal Information Institute. 40 CFR Part 136 — Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants. Cornell Law School, 2026. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-136.

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about 40 CFR Part 136: Guidelines for Water Analysis

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →