Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Who this is for: clinic staff, buyers and students who need to tell apart the reasons skin reacts to medical tape, and to see what is actually known about the adhesive in the tape. This page describes products and general use; it is not medical advice.
Short answer: an allergic reaction to medical tape is a cell-mediated immune response to a component of the adhesive. It is only one of several ways tape can injure skin, so a red or sore area under tape is not automatically an allergy.
What an allergic reaction to medical tape is
Medical tape is a backing (cloth, paper, plastic or similar) coated with an adhesive. Skin problems linked to adhesive products are grouped under the term medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI), defined in the literature as “any alteration in skin integrity characterized by erythema and/or other skin damage”. An international consensus meeting on peristomal MARSI described allergic contact dermatitis as “a cell-mediated immunologic response to an adhesive” (LeBlanc et al., 2019). For the tape product itself, see what medical tape is.
Allergy vs irritation vs skin injury
The same consensus paper cites earlier work that identified three main types of MARSI: mechanical, dermatitis, and other. Its list of types is summarised below.
| Type | How the source describes it |
|---|---|
| Mechanical (skin stripping, tension injury, skin tear) | Listed as MARSI types in the consensus paper; they are injuries to the skin surface, not immune responses. |
| Irritant contact dermatitis | “The development of erythema, edema, and possible vesicles” from chemical irritants, for example trapped stool or urine, or irritants in the adhesive product. |
| Allergic contact dermatitis | “A cell-mediated immunologic response to an adhesive.” |
| Other | Maceration and folliculitis are also listed among MARSI types. |
These definitions come from a peristomal consensus meeting that was sponsored by a manufacturer (Hollister), with one author employed by it, so treat them as definitions of terms rather than as comparative rates. The paper does not compare when each type appears. This page does not classify any individual reaction. In the study below, allergy was established by patch testing.
What in the tape can cause it
A 2023 peer-reviewed report in Acta Dermato-Venereologica (Hamnerius et al.) investigated an outbreak of foot dermatitis in 26 military conscripts after several days of continuous medical adhesive tape use during a field exercise. Its findings:
- Contact allergy to the adhesive tapes was found in 20 of 26 (77%), and to colophonium (rosin) in 16 (61%).
- Chemical analysis detected colophonium-related substances in the tapes implicated.
- In a comparison group of dermatitis patients aged 20-21, colophonium allergy was found in 0.4%.
- The authors concluded that “prolonged use of medical adhesive tapes on intact skin carries a high risk for allergic contact dermatitis.”
About 20% of patients allergic to the implicated tape had no culprit allergen identified, and the group was small, so the numbers describe this outbreak rather than tape users in general.
Tape types and what is known about them
The same study patch-tested several tapes as they came. These are the patch-test results reported in the study.
| Tape tested in the study | Positive patch tests (of 26) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Optiplaste-C | 18 (69%) | The tape implicated in the outbreak |
| Strappal | 3 (12%) | Fewer positives than Optiplaste-C |
| Adapta | 0 | No positive tests |
| Fortelast | 0 | No positive tests |
The paper reports these as findings only and does not recommend an alternative. The point for readers is that tapes differ in adhesive composition and in patch-test results, so “medical tape” is not one uniform exposure. Silicone adhesives are covered separately in what silicone adhesive is, and the broader hypoallergenic question in hypoallergenic vs standard medical tape.
Questions a buyer or clinic can ask a manufacturer
The 2023 authors state that medical devices should be assessed for possible side effects before introduction on the market. A reasonable question to put to a supplier is whether adhesive composition information, including any colophonium (rosin) content, is available for a given tape. This is a question to ask, not a claim about any product. Bandage and dressing categories are listed under medical bandages.
What the sources say about exposure
- The study linked its outbreak to prolonged, continuous tape use over several days on intact skin.
- The consensus paper describes irritant reactions as arising from chemical irritants, for example stool or urine trapped against skin, or irritants in the adhesive product.
Common misunderstandings
- Allergy versus other skin injury. Mechanical injury and irritant dermatitis are separate MARSI types from allergic contact dermatitis.
- Adhesive versus latex. A reaction can be to the adhesive. Latex wording is covered in products not made with natural rubber latex and latex-free kinesiology tape.
- Tapes are not interchangeable exposures. In the study, patch-test results ranged from 0 to 18 positives of 26 across four tapes.
FAQ
What causes an allergic reaction to medical tape?
In the one outbreak studied here, it was contact allergy to substances in the adhesive, chiefly colophonium-related substances (rosin), found by patch testing and chemical analysis of the tapes (Hamnerius et al., 2023).
Is an allergic reaction to tape the same as irritation?
No. The consensus paper defines allergic contact dermatitis as a cell-mediated immune response to an adhesive and irritant contact dermatitis as a response to chemical irritants, which may include irritants in the adhesive product.
Is a tape reaction a latex allergy?
Not necessarily. The reactions in the 2023 study were linked to adhesive substances, not latex.
Do all medical tapes give the same patch-test result?
No. In the 2023 study, positive patch tests ranged from 18 of 26 for Optiplaste-C to 0 of 26 for Adapta and Fortelast. The paper reports this as a finding in a small group and does not recommend an alternative.
Sources
- Hamnerius N, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Nilsson K, Sukakul T, Svedman C. Colophonium-related Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Medical Adhesive Tape Used to Prevent Skin Lesions in Soldiers. Acta Derm Venereol 2023;103:adv18428. Checked 2026-10-30. https://medicaljournalssweden.se/actadv/article/download/18428/39812?inline=1
- LeBlanc K, Whiteley I, McNichol L, Salvadalena G, Gray M. Peristomal Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury: Results of an International Consensus Meeting. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2019;46(2):125-136. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000513. Checked 2026-10-30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6519893
