Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Alvarado Score (MANTRELS): 10-Point Acute Appendicitis Calculation, Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), and AIR Score Compared

Calculate the 10-point Alvarado Score (MANTRELS) for acute appendicitis and compare it with the Samuel Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Andersson AIR Score.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

The Alvarado Score—published in 1986 by surgeon Alfredo Alvarado and universally taught via the MANTRELS acronym—is the classic 8-item, 10-point clinical prediction rule used to stratify the probability of acute appendicitis in patients presenting with acute right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain. Across emergency departments utilizing the Manchester Triage System, AI scribes for emergency medicine, and World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) diagnostic pathways, the Alvarado Score is deployed alongside two modern refinements: the 10-point Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS — Samuel, 2002) for children and the 12-point Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score (Andersson & Andersson, 2008), which incorporates C-reactive protein (CRP) and graded peritoneal irritation.

How Is the 10-Point Alvarado Score (MANTRELS Mnemonic: 3 Symptoms, 3 Signs, 2 Lab Findings; RLQ Tenderness and Leukocytosis Weighted 2 Points) Calculated?

Derived by Alfredo Alvarado (Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1986) from a cohort of 305 patients hospitalized with suspected acute appendicitis, the Alvarado Score evaluates 3 clinical symptoms, 3 physical examination signs, and 2 Complete Blood Count (CBC) laboratory findings. Six items carry 1 point each, while the two strongest predictors—Tenderness in the right lower quadrant (+2 points) and Leukocytosis > 10,000/µL (+2 points)—are double-weighted, yielding a maximum score of 10 points:

Domain MANTRELS Letter Clinical or Laboratory Variable (Alvarado, 1986) Points
3 Symptoms
(Max 3 points)
M Migration of pain from the periumbilical/epigastric region to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) +1
A Anorexia (loss of appetite) or acetone/ketones in urine +1
N Nausea or vomiting +1
3 Signs
(Max 4 points)
T Tenderness in the right lower quadrant (RLQ) on direct palpation (double-weighted) +2
R Rebound pain / rebound tenderness in the RLQ (Blumberg sign) +1
E Elevated temperature (oral temperature ≥ 37.3°C / 99.1°F) +1
2 Lab Findings
(Max 3 points)
L Leukocytosis (white blood cell [WBC] count > 10,000 /µL [10 × 109/L]) (double-weighted) +2
S Shift to the left of neutrophils (polymorphonuclear neutrophilia > 75%) +1

Note on the Modified Alvarado Score (Kalan et al., 1994): In clinical settings where an automated differential WBC count (neutrophil percentage) is unavailable, the Modified Alvarado Score (0–9 points) omits the “Shift to the left” item.

How Does the Alvarado Score (≤4 Rule-Out, 5–6 Equivocal, ≥7 High Probability) Compare with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score?

In systematic reviews (Ohle et al., BMC Medicine 2011) and the 2020 WSES Jerusalem Guidelines, the Alvarado Score demonstrates high sensitivity (~99% at a cutoff of ≤ 4) for ruling out appendicitis, but suffers from lower specificity in women of reproductive age and older adults, and relies on subjective binary rebound tenderness in children. To address these limitations, two complementary scores were developed:

  • Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS — Samuel, J Pediatr Surg 2002; 0 to 10 points): Validated for children aged 4 to 15 years, PAS retains the 8 MANTRELS concepts on a 10-point scale, but replaces subjective manual rebound pain with Cough / Percussion / Hopping tenderness in the RLQ (+2 points), weights RLQ tenderness at +2 points, reduces Leukocytosis (> 10,000/µL) to +1 point, defines fever as ≥ 38.0°C (100.4°F, +1 point), and defines polymorphonuclear neutrophilia as > 75% (or ANC > 7,500/µL, +1 point).
  • Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score (Andersson & Andersson, World J Surg 2008; 0 to 12 points): Designed for both adults and children, the AIR Score omits subjective anorexia and pain migration, grades rebound tenderness / muscular defense across 3 objective levels (Light = +1, Medium = +2, Strong = +3), grades WBC count (10.0–14.9 × 109/L = +1; ≥ 15.0 × 109/L = +2) and PMN % (70%–84% = +1; ≥ 85% = +2), and adds C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (10–49 mg/L = +1; ≥ 50 mg/L = +2), alongside vomiting (+1), RLQ pain (+1), and temperature ≥ 38.5°C (+1).
Risk Stratum Alvarado Score (0–10)
(Adults & General)
Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS, 0–10)
(Children 4–15 Years)
AIR Score (0–12)
(Andersson et al., Includes CRP)
Low Risk (Rule-Out Tier) 0 – 4 points: Very low probability (~96%–99% sensitivity); safe for outpatient discharge or observation without CT 0 – 3 points: Low probability of appendicitis; discharge with safety-net precautions without imaging 0 – 4 points: Low probability; safe outpatient follow-up without diagnostic imaging
Intermediate / Equivocal Tier 5 – 6 points: Compatible with appendicitis; order point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) or abdominal/pelvic CT and serial clinical reassessment 4 – 6 points: Equivocal; order graded-compression abdominal ultrasound as first-line imaging 5 – 8 points: Indeterminate group; perform diagnostic imaging (ultrasound first-line, followed by low-dose CT if inconclusive) or active in-hospital observation with repeat AIR scoring
High Risk (Surgical Tier) 7 – 10 points (7–8 probable, 9–10 very probable): Surgical consultation (or confirmatory imaging per institutional protocol, especially in females or older adults) 7 – 10 points: High probability; pediatric surgical consultation (often paired with ultrasound) 9 – 12 points: High specificity (>97%) for advanced/perforated appendicitis; direct surgical consultation / diagnostic laparoscopy

How Are Alvarado and AIR Scores Used in Emergency Department CDS to Reduce Unnecessary CT Radiation Exposure?

In pediatric and young-adult emergency medicine, indiscriminate abdominal computed tomography (CT) exposes radiosensitive patients to ionizing radiation (~5 to 10 mSv per standard abdominal/pelvic CT) and contrast nephropathy. When implemented as Clinical Quality Language (CQL) rules and HL7 FHIR Observation calculators inside the EHR:

  1. Eliminating Imaging in Low-Risk Patients (Alvarado ≤ 4, PAS ≤ 3, or AIR ≤ 4): In prospective multicenter trials—including the STRADAS randomized trial (Andersson et al., 2017)—using the AIR or Alvarado score to withhold imaging in low-risk patients reduced hospital admissions and cross-sectional imaging by more than 30% without increasing missed perforations.
  2. Staged Ultrasound-First Protocol in Intermediate Risk (Alvarado 5–6, PAS 4–6, AIR 5–8): Rather than ordering an immediate abdominal CT, CDS order sets direct intermediate-risk patients to graded-compression right lower quadrant ultrasonography (sensitivity ~86%, specificity ~95% when the appendix is visualized as a non-compressible blind-ending tubular structure > 6 mm in diameter). Low-dose CT or MRI (in pregnant patients) is reserved strictly for intermediate-risk patients with an equivocal/non-visualized appendix on ultrasound and persistent score elevation on serial reassessment 4–8 hours later.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the 10-point Alvarado Score (MANTRELS mnemonic: 3 symptoms, 3 signs, 2 lab findings; RLQ tenderness and leukocytosis weighted 2 points) calculated?

The 10-point Alvarado Score sums 8 variables remembered by the MANTRELS mnemonic: Migration of pain to the RLQ (+1), Anorexia (+1), Nausea or vomiting (+1), Tenderness in the RLQ (+2), Rebound tenderness (+1), Elevated temperature ≥37.3°C / 99.1°F (+1), Leukocytosis >10,000/µL (+2), and Shift to the left with neutrophils >75% (+1).

How does the Alvarado Score (≤4 rule-out, 5–6 equivocal, ≥7 high probability) compare with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score?

An Alvarado Score of 0–4 rules out acute appendicitis with ~99% sensitivity, 5–6 is equivocal (requiring ultrasound or CT), and 7–10 indicates high probability. The Samuel Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS, 0–10) adapts this for children ages 4–15 by assigning 2 points to RLQ cough/percussion/hopping tenderness (0–3 low, 4–6 equivocal, 7–10 high). The Andersson AIR Score (0–12) improves specificity across all ages by grading rebound/muscular defense (1–3 points) and adding C-reactive protein (CRP, 1–2 points), stratifying patients into low (0–4), intermediate (5–8), and high (9–12) risk.

How are Alvarado and AIR scores used in Emergency Department CDS to reduce unnecessary CT radiation exposure?

Emergency Department clinical decision support uses Alvarado (≤4), PAS (≤3), and AIR (≤4) scores to safely exclude appendicitis without any ionizing radiation, and routes intermediate-risk patients (Alvarado 5–6, PAS 4–6, AIR 5–8) to radiation-free graded-compression ultrasound first, reserving low-dose CT strictly for patients with inconclusive ultrasound findings.

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Alvarado Score (MANTRELS): 10-Point Acute Appendicitis Calculation, Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), and AIR Score Compared

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →