Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
The CPHQ (Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality) is awarded by the Healthcare Quality Certification Commission (HQCC), the certifying arm of the National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ). Almost everything written about it online is exam-cram material. This page is the opposite: it reproduces what NAHQ itself publishes — the detailed examination content outline, the item count behind every content category, the scoring model, and the eligibility position — and cross-walks those categories against the competency framework the credential is built on and against the artefacts a quality professional actually produces at work.
The single most useful thing here is a distinction NAHQ publishes but rarely gets restated: the competency framework has eight domains, and the exam has seven content categories. One framework domain is not an examinable category at all. Knowing which one, and why, tells you more about what this credential certifies than any question bank.
Which edition this page describes — read this first
Domain structure, item counts, fees and eligibility language change between exam editions and handbook revisions. This page describes:
- The 2024 CPHQ Detailed Content Outline, Revision 2b, carrying the footer note “Last updated: 3/2023” and a Healthcare Quality Certification Commission copyright line. NAHQ’s own exam-preparation page identifies this document as the content outline the exam currently covers.
- The CPHQ Domestic Candidate Handbook, version V.2024.7. An International Candidate Handbook is published separately and differs on administration and fees.
Confirm every number below against the current candidate handbook on NAHQ’s site before you apply. NAHQ requires candidates to attest that they have read the handbook as part of the application, and the handbook — not this page and not any third-party summary — is the controlling document. Where a figure is described below as derived rather than published, that is stated explicitly.
How the examination is constructed
From the Domestic Candidate Handbook (V.2024.7):
| Element | As published |
|---|---|
| Format | Objective, multiple-choice, computer-delivered |
| Total questions presented | 140 |
| Scored questions | 125 |
| Unscored pretest questions | 15, dispersed through the exam and not identifiable |
| Time limit | 3 hours |
| Delivery | PSI test centres or online, year-round |
| Cognitive mix | Approximately 23% recall, 57% application, 20% analysis |
| Score scale | 200 to 800 |
| Passing score | 600 |
| Standard-setting method | Angoff method, applied in a Passing Point Study by a panel of subject-matter experts |
| Window to schedule after payment | 90 days |
Two consequences follow directly from that table. First, because 15 of the 140 items are unscored pretest items you cannot identify, there is no way to triage your effort during the exam — every item has to be answered as though it counts. Second, the passing standard is criterion-referenced, not curved: the handbook states plainly that your ability to pass depends on the knowledge and skill you display, not on the performance of other candidates. Passing scores may vary slightly between exam versions, and statistical equating adjusts for difficulty between forms.
The seven content categories and their item counts
NAHQ’s detailed content outline is unusual among healthcare credentials in that it publishes item counts, not percentages. That is more informative, because a count is unambiguous. The seven categories and their published counts:
| # | Content category (as published) | Scored items | Share of 125 (derived) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quality Leadership and Integration | 19 | 15.2% |
| 2 | Performance and Process Improvement | 27 | 21.6% |
| 3 | Population Health and Care Transitions | 11 | 8.8% |
| 4 | Health Data Analytics | 26 | 20.8% |
| 5 | Patient Safety | 18 | 14.4% |
| 6 | Quality Review and Accountability | 16 | 12.8% |
| 7 | Regulatory and Accreditation | 8 | 6.4% |
| Total | 125 | 100% |
The item counts are NAHQ’s; the percentage column is arithmetic performed here on those counts and is not published by NAHQ. The counts sum exactly to the 125 scored items, which is a useful internal check that you are reading a complete and current outline rather than a partial reproduction.
The distribution is the finding. Performance and Process Improvement (27) plus Health Data Analytics (26) is 53 of 125 items — 42.4% of the scored exam. Those are the two most method-heavy, most technique-dependent categories in the outline. Meanwhile Regulatory and Accreditation, the category most people assume dominates a healthcare quality credential, carries 8 items — 6.4%. A study plan weighted by intuition about what “healthcare quality” means will be badly mis-weighted against the actual blueprint.
The eighth domain: what the competency framework contains that the exam does not
NAHQ’s Healthcare Quality Competency Framework — which NAHQ describes as twice-validated — has eight domains. The examination has seven content categories. The cross-walk:
| Competency framework domain | Examinable content category | Scored items |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Leadership & Integration | 1. Quality Leadership and Integration | 19 |
| Performance & Process Improvement | 2. Performance and Process Improvement | 27 |
| Population Health & Care Transitions | 3. Population Health and Care Transitions | 11 |
| Health Data Analytics | 4. Health Data Analytics | 26 |
| Patient Safety | 5. Patient Safety | 18 |
| Quality Review & Accountability | 6. Quality Review and Accountability | 16 |
| Regulatory & Accreditation | 7. Regulatory and Accreditation | 8 |
| Professional Engagement | No corresponding examinable category | 0 |
Professional Engagement is a domain of the competency framework and is not a content category on the examination. That is not an oversight; it reflects what a multiple-choice psychometric instrument can and cannot measure. Professional Engagement covers things demonstrated over time in a workplace — mentoring, contribution to the profession, ethical conduct in practice — which a 140-item proctored exam is a poor instrument for. The examination measures the seven domains that reduce to defensible right-and-wrong items.
The practical reading: the CPHQ certifies knowledge and applied judgment across seven competency domains, not the whole competency framework, and not professional standing. Anyone describing the credential as certifying the framework in full is overstating what the blueprint supports.
What each content category actually asks you to do
The outline is written almost entirely in doing verbs — use, evaluate, incorporate, facilitate, apply, design, interpret, collect, validate — not in knowing verbs. That is the clearest signal in the document about how to prepare, and it lines up with the 57%-application / 20%-analysis cognitive mix. Below, each category’s published task areas, with the artefacts they correspond to in practice.
1. Quality Leadership and Integration — 19 items
Two task groups. Strategic Planning: advise leadership on organizational improvement opportunities; assist with developing action plans or projects; assist with establishing priorities; participate in activities supporting the quality governance infrastructure; align quality and safety activities with strategic goals. Stakeholder Engagement: identify resource needs; assess the organization’s culture of quality and safety; engage stakeholders; provide consultative support to the governing body and key stakeholders on their quality-improvement roles and responsibilities; promote engagement and inter-professional teamwork.
Note how much of this is board-facing. The governing body’s accountability for quality is the thread running through this category, and it is the same thread that surfaces in a QAPI plan and performance improvement project write-up, where the governing body’s approval and oversight are explicit programme requirements.
2. Performance and Process Improvement — 27 items
The largest category, and a flat list rather than a nested one: implement quality improvement training; communicate improvement information across the organization; identify improvement opportunities; establish teams, roles, responsibilities and scope; participate in identifying innovative or evidence-based practices; lead and facilitate change; use performance improvement methods (the outline names Lean, PDSA and Six Sigma); use quality tools and techniques (the outline names fishbone diagram, FMEA and process map); participate in monitoring project timelines and deliverables; evaluate team effectiveness; evaluate the success of improvement projects and solutions.
The named methods and tools are worth taking literally — the outline commits to them by name. The PDSA cycle and the Model for Improvement is the one you should be able to run end to end rather than merely define, since 57% of items require application rather than recall.
3. Population Health and Care Transitions — 11 items
Identify data and resources for determining the health status of defined populations; identify population health management strategies to integrate into improvement initiatives; incorporate prevention, wellness and disease management solutions; incorporate techniques to address health disparities and promote equity; analyze and use clinical, cost, equity and social-determinants-of-health data to drive and monitor improvement; identify opportunities for improvement in care transitions; collaborate with stakeholders to improve and optimize care processes and transitions; incorporate concepts of social determinants of health into improvement activities.
Care transitions is where this category becomes concrete and measurable. The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program is the payment programme that turns transition failures into a measured, penalised outcome, and it is the natural worked example for this category.
4. Health Data Analytics — 26 items
The second-largest category, and the one candidates most often under-prepare. Two task groups. Data Management Systems: assist in evaluating and developing data management systems; design data collection plans — covering measure development (definitions, goals, thresholds, numerators and denominators), tools and techniques, and sampling methodology; identify and select measures (structure, process, outcome, experience); collect and validate quantitative and qualitative data; identify external data sources for comparison and benchmarking; design scorecards and dashboards for different audiences.
Measurement and Analysis: use data management systems for organizing, analysing and reporting data; use data visualization and display techniques; use measurement tools to evaluate process improvement; use statistics to describe data and examine relationships — the outline names measures of central tendency, standard deviation, correlation, regression and the t-test; use statistical process control techniques and tools — the outline names common and special cause variation, control charts and trend analysis; compare data sources to establish benchmarks; interpret data to support decision-making.
This is a genuinely quantitative category. The named statistical content is explicit and not decorative: common versus special cause variation and control-chart interpretation are the classic application-level items, because they require a judgment (is this signal or noise?) rather than a definition.
5. Patient Safety — 18 items
Identify technology solutions to enhance patient safety; facilitate ongoing evaluation of safety activities; apply techniques to enhance the culture of safety; integrate safety concepts throughout the organization; use safety principles — the outline names human factors engineering, high reliability, high-performance teams and systems thinking; and participate in safety and risk management activities related to safety event/incident reporting, sentinel or unexpected event review, root cause analysis, and proactive risk assessment.
Each of those four risk-management activities maps to a real, procedurally-defined body of work. Event review and root cause analysis is where the patient safety organization work-product privilege determines what can be said and where; the response to an individual event is governed by a just culture algorithm rather than by outcome severity; and the standards under which safety activity is judged during a survey are the National Patient Safety Goals. Clinical case review through a morbidity and mortality conference is the physician-facing counterpart to the quality department’s event review.
6. Quality Review and Accountability — 16 items
Apply standards, best practices and other information from quality-related organizations; evaluate compliance with internal and external requirements for clinical practice guidelines, pathways and outcomes; quality-based payment programs; documentation; practitioner performance evaluation; patient experience; and identification of reportable events for accreditation and regulatory bodies. Plus: maintain confidentiality of performance and quality improvement records and reports; and implement and evaluate quality initiatives that impact reimbursement.
Three of those sub-items have exact real-world referents worth studying as artefacts rather than concepts. Practitioner performance evaluation is OPPE and FPPE — two distinct processes with different triggers that are routinely confused. Quality-based payment programs and initiatives that impact reimbursement are, in the inpatient setting, the Total Performance Score under Hospital Value-Based Purchasing. And confidentiality of quality improvement records is, again, the PSO privilege — which is why it appears in two separate content categories.
7. Regulatory and Accreditation — 8 items
The smallest category, at 6.4% of scored items: evaluate appropriate accreditation, certification and recognition options; promote awareness of statutory and regulatory requirements within the organization; support processes for evaluating, monitoring and improving compliance with organizational, state and federal requirements; and maintain survey or accreditation readiness.
“Evaluate appropriate accreditation options” is a real comparative judgment, not a recall item — the choice between accreditors with deemed status differs on survey cadence, methodology and cost, which is the substance of DNV versus The Joint Commission. And the sharp end of survey readiness is the immediate jeopardy removal plan and its clock — the situation the readiness work exists to prevent.
The cognitive mix is the actual study instruction
Approximately 23% recall, 57% application, 20% analysis. Read that alongside the verb list above and the implication is unambiguous: roughly three-quarters of the scored exam asks you to do something with information rather than retrieve it. Flashcard-style memorisation addresses about 29 of 125 items.
What that means in practice: for every named method and tool in the outline — PDSA, Lean, Six Sigma, fishbone, FMEA, process mapping, control charts, common and special cause variation, t-tests, regression — the target is not the definition but the selection judgment. Which tool for which problem, what the output looks like, what it would mean if the chart showed a run of eight points on one side of the centre line, and what you would do next.
Eligibility: what NAHQ actually requires
This is widely misreported, so here is the handbook’s own framing. Under the heading Eligibility Requirements, the V.2024.7 Domestic Candidate Handbook states that all potential candidates have complete access to the examination process, and that those who aspire to demonstrate their competency in the field of healthcare quality have an opportunity to do so and earn certification.
In other words there is no formal degree, licence or documented-experience gate on sitting the exam. What the handbook does state is the level the exam is written to: the examination committee develops and writes the examination to test the knowledge, skills and abilities of effective quality professionals who have been performing tasks on the examination outline for at least 2 years.
That is a statement about item difficulty calibration, not an admission requirement — and it is the more useful of the two facts. It tells you the reference point the Angoff panel had in mind when they set the passing standard: a person with roughly two years of hands-on practice against that outline. If your practice does not yet cover, say, control-chart interpretation or measure development, that is the gap the blueprint is calibrated against.
The handbook reports that the pass rate among US-based candidates in 2023 was 65%. Administrative details in the same handbook edition — a domestic examination fee of USD 519 for NAHQ members and USD 619 for non-members when paid online by credit card, with higher amounts for payment by mailed check, and a 90-day window to schedule after payment — are the figures most likely to have changed since publication. Verify them in the current handbook rather than relying on this page.
How scoring works, and why the category subscores do not
Your pass or fail status is determined by your overall raw score across the 125 scored questions, converted to the 200–800 scale, with 600 as the passing score. The unofficial score report shown at the test centre also breaks out percentages of questions answered correctly in each of the seven major content categories.
Those category percentages are explicitly not used in the pass-fail decision. The handbook states they are provided only as feedback, to give a general indication of performance within each content category. This matters for anyone re-sitting: a low category subscore is diagnostic information, not a separately failable component, and with 8 items in the smallest category a subscore can move a long way on very few questions.
Maintaining the credential
Certification runs for a 2-year period beginning 1 January of the year following the date you pass. Maintaining it requires continuing education reviewed and established annually by HQCC; the requirements stated in the handbook are 30 CEs over the 2-year recertification cycle, earned during the cycle, plus payment of a recertification fee. All CE must relate to areas covered in the most current examination content outline.
One provision is worth noting because it follows from the same logic as the missing eighth domain: current employment in the quality field is not required to maintain active CPHQ status. The credential attests to knowledge across the seven examined domains, not to a current role. Recertification is governed by a separate Recertification Handbook, which is where the current-cycle requirements live.
A study path built from the outline rather than from a question bank
The outline supports a straightforward, defensible sequence, weighted by published item counts rather than by topic familiarity:
- Start with the two heavy method categories (53 of 125 items). Performance and Process Improvement and Health Data Analytics together carry more than 42% of the scored exam. Work them as skills: run a PDSA cycle on a real process, build a control chart from real data and defend the special-cause calls.
- Anchor each remaining category to one real artefact you can read end to end. A completed RCA and its action plan for Patient Safety; an OPPE report for Quality Review and Accountability; a readmissions measure specification with numerator, denominator and exclusions for Population Health and Care Transitions; a survey findings report for Regulatory and Accreditation.
- For every named tool, practise the selection judgment. FMEA versus RCA is prospective versus retrospective; a fishbone organises causes but does not rank them; a process map precedes both. Application items test the choice.
- Cover measure construction explicitly. Measure development — definitions, goals, thresholds, numerators, denominators — plus sampling methodology and the structure/process/outcome/experience taxonomy is the densest single sub-area in the largest quantitative category.
- Treat Regulatory and Accreditation proportionally. At 8 items it is the smallest category. It rewards knowing the accreditor landscape and readiness posture, not memorising standards text.
- Skip Professional Engagement for exam purposes. It is a real competency domain and it is not on the blueprint.
For the broader body of work these domains describe, see CASRAI’s patient safety cluster, which covers the surveillance definitions, event-review procedures, survey standards and accountability programmes the exam categories point at.
Frequently asked questions
How many questions are on the CPHQ exam, and how many are scored?
140 questions are presented; 125 are scored and 15 are unscored pretest items dispersed through the exam. You cannot tell which are which, so every item should be answered as though it counts. The time limit is 3 hours.
What is the passing score?
The exam is scored on a 200–800 scale with 600 as the passing score. The minimum passing score is set by the Angoff method in a Passing Point Study conducted by a panel of subject-matter experts, and is criterion-referenced — it does not depend on how other candidates performed. Statistical equating adjusts for slight differences in difficulty between exam versions.
Are there eligibility requirements to sit the CPHQ?
The V.2024.7 Domestic Candidate Handbook states that all potential candidates have complete access to the examination process. There is no formal degree, licence or documented-experience gate. Separately, the handbook states the exam is written to test professionals who have been performing tasks on the examination outline for at least 2 years — a difficulty calibration, not an admission rule. Confirm against the current handbook.
Which content category carries the most items?
Performance and Process Improvement, at 27 of 125 scored items (21.6%), closely followed by Health Data Analytics at 26 (20.8%). Together they account for 53 items, or 42.4% of the scored exam. The smallest is Regulatory and Accreditation at 8 items (6.4%).
Does the CPHQ exam test all eight domains of NAHQ’s competency framework?
No. The framework has eight domains; the examination has seven content categories. Professional Engagement has no corresponding examinable category — it describes practice demonstrated over time in a workplace rather than knowledge a proctored multiple-choice exam can measure.
Do the content-category subscores on the score report affect pass or fail?
No. Pass-fail is determined by the overall score across all 125 scored questions. The handbook states the category percentages are provided only as feedback to indicate general performance within each category.
How long does the certification last, and what maintains it?
Two years, beginning 1 January of the year following the date you pass. Maintenance requires 30 CEs over the 2-year recertification cycle, all relating to areas covered in the most current examination content outline, plus a recertification fee. Current employment in the quality field is not required to maintain active status. See the separate Recertification Handbook for current-cycle requirements.
Where does the authoritative version of all this live?
NAHQ publishes the CPHQ Detailed Content Outline and the Domestic and International Candidate Handbooks on its own site, and requires candidates to attest to having read the handbook when applying. Domain structure, item counts, fees and eligibility language change between editions; the current handbook is controlling and this page is not.
Primary sources
- CPHQ Detailed Content Outline, 2024, Revision 2b (PDF) — Healthcare Quality Certification Commission. Source for all seven content categories, their item counts, the task lists, and the recall/application/analysis mix.
- Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality Domestic Candidate Handbook, V.2024.7 (PDF) — NAHQ/HQCC. Source for eligibility language, exam construction, the 200–800 scale and 600 passing score, Angoff standard-setting, scoring and score-report treatment, recertification, fees and the 2023 US pass rate.
- NAHQ Healthcare Quality Competency Framework — source for the eight competency domains, including Professional Engagement.
- NAHQ, Prepare for the CPHQ Exam — identifies the 2024 Revision 2b outline as the content outline the exam currently covers, and names the seven categories.
- An International Candidate Handbook is published separately by NAHQ and differs on administration and fees; candidates testing outside the United States should work from that document, not this page.
