Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

ddPCR (Droplet Digital PCR): How It Works and What to Report

How ddPCR splits a reaction into droplets, counts positives and applies Poisson correction, with a worked example and what dMIQE 2020 says to report.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Short answer: ddPCR (droplet digital PCR) splits one PCR reaction into thousands of nanolitre-scale droplets, amplifies each droplet separately, and counts how many end up fluorescence-positive. The fraction of positive droplets, corrected with Poisson statistics, gives an absolute copy number without a standard curve.

Definition and scope

Droplet digital PCR is one format of digital PCR (dPCR), in which the sample is partitioned so that each partition holds zero, one or a few target molecules. In ddPCR the partitions are droplets suspended in oil. The result is a concentration of target molecules, not a quantification cycle (Cq) that has to be converted through a calibration curve. For the broader choice between the two approaches, see the digital PCR vs qPCR comparison; this page covers what ddPCR is, why the arithmetic works, and what a report has to contain.

How ddPCR works in practice

The description below follows the system published by Hindson and colleagues (Analytical Chemistry, 2011), which is the paper that introduced the droplet-based platform. Figures are given as that paper reports them for that system; they are not specifications for any instrument sold today.

  • Partitioning. In the 2011 system, about 20,000 monodisperse droplets of 1 nL each were formed from a 20 µL reaction. Applying a vacuum to the outlet wells drew sample and oil through a flow-focusing junction.
  • End-point reading. After thermal cycling, each droplet is read for fluorescence. In the authors’ words, a simple threshold on fluorescence amplitude assigns each droplet as positive or negative.
  • Counting and correction. The positive fraction is converted to a concentration with a Poisson correction, which the authors describe as extending the dynamic range into the region where droplets hold, on average, more than one copy.
  • No calibrators. The authors report quantitation without external calibrators or endogenous controls, because the count itself carries the information that a standard curve supplies in qPCR.

Why the Poisson correction matters: a worked example

If copies were counted simply as positive droplets, any droplet that started with two or more copies would be undercounted. The correction uses the negative droplets instead. With a mean of λ copies per droplet, the fraction of empty droplets is e−λ, so λ = −ln(fraction negative). The numbers below are hypothetical counts chosen for the arithmetic, using the 2011 system’s partition sizes (20,000 droplets of 1 nL, 20 µL reaction).

Step Value
Droplets accepted 20,000
Positive / negative droplets 5,000 / 15,000
Fraction negative 15,000 / 20,000 = 0.75
λ = −ln(0.75) 0.288 copies per droplet
Copies in the 20,000 nL reaction 0.288 × 20,000 ≈ 5,754
Uncorrected count (positives only) 5,000

The gap between 5,754 and 5,000 is the multiple-copy droplets that a plain count misses. It widens as the positive fraction rises, which is why the correction, and the assumptions behind it, belong in the report.

Related concepts

ddPCR sits next to several concepts that are easy to conflate:

  • qPCR reads fluorescence every cycle and depends on a calibration curve or reference for absolute numbers; see qPCR and RT-qPCR and standard-curve building.
  • Digital PCR is the general category; droplets are one way to make the partitions.
  • Multiplexing places more than one assay in the same reaction; see multiplexed PCR.
  • Copy number is a common application: the 2011 paper used the platform for DNA copy number, and the topic is covered in copy number of a gene.

Where it matters for labs: what to report

The dMIQE Group’s 2020 update (Huggett et al., Clinical Chemistry 66(8):1012) sets out the minimum information for publishing digital PCR experiments. These are the items from it that most directly follow from the ddPCR arithmetic above:

Report this What dMIQE 2020 says
Partition number The average number and range of measured partitions is necessary.
Partition volume Partition volumes, whether assumed or directly measured, and the software versions used should be reported.
Threshold Reports should include the method of manual threshold setting.
Negative controls Reactions containing the reaction mix without template are required, plus a control with the same DNA/RNA background but without the targeted sequence.
Low-level false positives The false-positive frequency defines the limit of detection or quantification.
Items that do not apply The revised checklist adds a comments section for the rationale.

The same guideline lists the conditions that must hold for results to follow the Poisson distribution: clear separation of positive and negative partitions, equal partition volumes, and random distribution of the target. If a run fails one of these, the corrected concentration is not trustworthy, so check them before reading the number. For the equivalent checklist on the qPCR side, see MIQE guidelines; for the statistics, see the Poisson distribution.

Common misunderstandings

  • “Absolute” means error-free. It means the concentration comes from counting and Poisson statistics rather than a calibration curve. It still depends on the partition volume being right and on the threshold separating positives from negatives, which is why dMIQE asks for both.
  • The positive fraction is the copy number. Only when almost every positive droplet holds one copy. The worked example shows the difference.
  • Sensitivity figures transfer between systems. The 0.001% mutant fraction (BRAF V600E) that Hindson et al. reported, which they put at 1,000 times lower than real-time PCR, is a result for their 2011 system and assay, not a property of every ddPCR run.
  • Negative controls are optional with counting methods. dMIQE 2020 calls for them, because false-positive droplets set the practical limit of detection.

FAQ

What does ddPCR stand for?

Droplet digital PCR: a digital PCR format in which the reaction is divided into droplets suspended in oil that are amplified and read individually.

Does ddPCR need a standard curve?

No. Hindson et al. report quantitation without external calibrators or endogenous controls, because the Poisson-corrected count of positive and negative droplets gives the concentration directly.

How many droplets does a reaction produce?

In the 2011 system described by Hindson et al., about 20,000 droplets of 1 nL from a 20 µL reaction. Report the actual number for your instrument; dMIQE 2020 asks for the average number and range of measured partitions.

What should a ddPCR methods section include?

At minimum the items in the table above: partition number and range, partition volume and software version, the threshold method, and the no-template control and the background control without the target.

Sources

  • Hindson BJ et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Analytical Chemistry 2011. DOI 10.1021/ac202028g, PMID 22035192. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3216358 (checked 2026-10-29).
  • Huggett JF; dMIQE Group. The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020. Clinical Chemistry 2020;66(8):1012. DOI 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa125, PMID 32746458. academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/66/8/1012/5880067 (checked 2026-10-29).

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about ddPCR (Droplet Digital PCR): How It Works and What to Report

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →