Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

DOE PAGES: The Department of Energy’s Public Access Repository

DOE PAGES (Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science) is the Department of Energy’s designated repository for peer-reviewed manuscripts and articles from DOE-funded research. This guide covers who must deposit, the E-Link workflow, embargo history, and compliance mechanics for grant and contract administrators.

DOE PAGES (the Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science) is the U.S. Department of Energy’s designated repository and discovery tool for peer-reviewed scholarly publications arising from DOE-funded research. It is built and operated by the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) and exists specifically to satisfy DOE’s federal public access mandate: full-text accepted manuscripts and metadata for journal articles, conference papers, and other peer-reviewed literature produced under DOE awards must be deposited so the public can find and read them free of charge.

For research administrators, DOE PAGES matters less as a search tool and more as a compliance obligation attached to every DOE award — comparable in function, though not in mechanics, to NIH’s requirement to deposit into PubMed Central or NSF’s requirement to deposit into NSF-PAR. This guide focuses on that research-administration angle: who has to deposit, what the deposit workflow actually involves, how the embargo rules have changed, and how DOE’s system differs from the other major federal public-access repositories.

What DOE PAGES is (and isn’t)

DOE PAGES holds peer-reviewed scholarly publications only — accepted manuscripts and, where publishers participate, the final published version. It is a subset, publications-focused front end that sits alongside the much broader OSTI.GOV, which indexes the full range of DOE-funded R&D outputs: technical reports, patents, software records, and datasets, in addition to publications. If you’re looking for a DOE-funded dataset or a technical report rather than a journal article, OSTI.GOV’s broader search — not DOE PAGES specifically — is the right tool.

DOE PAGES is also not the same thing as searching for DOE award/grant records themselves. If your task is finding which DOE awards funded a given project or PI, see our companion guide on DOE Award Search; DOE PAGES is downstream of that — it’s where the outputs of an already-funded award get deposited, not where you look up the award itself.

DOE PAGES also has a discovery partnership with CHORUS (Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United States), a nonprofit publisher consortium: for participating publishers, CHORUS supplies metadata and links directly to the publisher-hosted version of record, which DOE PAGES surfaces alongside author-deposited manuscripts. This doesn’t change the underlying deposit obligation — it’s a discovery-layer convenience, not a substitute compliance path, unless the specific publisher/journal combination is confirmed as CHORUS-participating for that article.

Who has to deposit, and when

The obligation flows from DOE’s Public Access Plan (first issued 2014, most recently revised in 2023) and applies to any peer-reviewed scholarly publication — journal article or juried conference paper — resulting from DOE-funded research, regardless of which DOE program office issued the award. In practice, the deposit obligation sits with the funded researcher and their institution’s sponsored-research office, not with DOE itself or with the publisher (except where CHORUS metadata sharing covers a specific title).

What must be deposited, per DOE’s public access guidance:

  • The full-text accepted manuscript (the peer-reviewed, author-final version prior to publisher copyediting/typesetting) — or the published open-access article where one exists.
  • Associated bibliographic metadata.
  • The DOE contract/award number tied to the funding that produced the work — this is the field DOE uses to link a publication back to a specific award, and it is the single most common point of friction in the deposit workflow, since a paper is frequently produced under more than one grant or during a no-cost extension where the number on file may be outdated.

Deposit is expected no later than the publication date. Multi-institution and multi-funder papers still require the DOE-funded co-author (or their institution) to submit on DOE’s behalf — deposit into DOE PAGES is not automatically satisfied by deposit into a different funder’s repository, even for the same manuscript.

The deposit workflow: E-Link

Manuscripts are submitted through E-Link, OSTI’s electronic submission portal, rather than through DOE PAGES’ public-facing search interface directly. The practical workflow research offices generally need to track is:

  1. Confirm the DOE contract number for the award before submission — sponsored programs offices should keep this on file alongside the Notice of Award, since the researcher submitting via E-Link will need it and it’s easy to lose track of on longer-running or renewed awards.
  2. Submit the accepted manuscript (the version accepted by the journal after peer review, before final publisher formatting) along with metadata — title, authors, journal, DOI where available — through E-Link once acceptance is confirmed, and no later than the official publication date.
  3. OSTI processes the submission and assigns it a persistent identifier within its system, making it discoverable and downloadable through both DOE PAGES and the broader OSTI.GOV search once processing completes.
  4. Track compliance at the institutional level — research offices administering multiple DOE awards typically need some mechanism (a spreadsheet, a compliance module in their research information system, or periodic OSTI reporting) to confirm every DOE-funded publication a PI produces actually gets deposited, since journals do not do this automatically and DOE does not chase individual non-compliant deposits the way NIH’s PMC pipeline is sometimes described as doing.

Because deposit is manuscript-based rather than tied to a specific journal’s workflow, it does not depend on the publisher offering a deposit-on-your-behalf option (unlike, for example, some journals’ direct-to-PMC submission integrations for NIH-funded authors). The obligation rests with the DOE-funded author.

Embargo history and the current no-embargo policy

DOE’s embargo policy changed materially in the mid-2020s and this is one of the most consequential compliance details for research offices tracking older vs. newer awards:

  • Before October 1, 2024: DOE applied an administrative interval — effectively an embargo — of up to 12 months after publication before the full text became publicly accessible, even though metadata and the deposit record existed immediately.
  • On or after October 1, 2024: publications are made publicly available with no embargo. This reflects DOE’s 2023 Public Access Plan revision, which eliminated the administrative interval entirely, aligning DOE with the broader federal push toward immediate public access to federally funded research (the same policy direction reflected in NSF’s move to zero-embargo NSF-PAR deposit for awards made on or after January 22, 2026).

For research offices, this means the correct embargo rule to apply to a given DOE-funded publication depends on its publication date, not the award’s start date or the current policy at the time of deposit — a paper published in 2023 under an award that is still active in 2026 was still subject to the older embargo terms in effect when it was published. See our related coverage of the embargo concept generally for how this compares to embargo mechanics used by publishers and other repositories.

DOE PAGES vs. NIH PMC vs. NSF-PAR: what’s actually different

All three are federal-agency public-access repositories responding to the same underlying policy lineage (the 2013 OSTP public access memorandum and its successors), but they are separate systems with separate submission portals, separate scope, and no cross-satisfaction between them. A researcher with joint DOE/NSF funding on a single paper must deposit into both DOE PAGES and NSF-PAR — depositing into one does not excuse the other.

Feature DOE PAGES NIH / PubMed Central NSF-PAR
Operated by DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) National Library of Medicine National Science Foundation
Submission system E-Link NIH Manuscript Submission (NIHMS) system, often via publisher integration Research.gov / NSF-PAR direct submission
Scope Peer-reviewed publications from DOE-funded research Peer-reviewed manuscripts from NIH-funded research Peer-reviewed publications and juried conference papers from NSF-funded research
Current embargo None, for publications on/after Oct 1, 2024 Governed by NIH Public Access Policy (varies by award/effective date) None, for awards made on/after Jan 22, 2026
Key required identifier DOE contract/award number NIH award number NSF award ID

The practical implication for a research administration office managing a multi-funder portfolio: track each award’s designated repository and identifier requirement separately in whatever compliance system you use, rather than assuming a single public-access-deposit step covers every funder. See our guide to the Data Management Plan (DMP) for how these publication-deposit obligations typically get referenced (though not fully specified) alongside a project’s separate data-sharing plan — DOE PAGES itself is publications-only and does not substitute for a DOE-funded dataset’s own data-management or preservation obligations.

Frequently asked questions

Does DOE PAGES cover research data, not just publications?

No. DOE PAGES is scoped to peer-reviewed scholarly publications — manuscripts and articles. Datasets, software, and technical reports produced under DOE funding are tracked through OSTI.GOV’s broader systems, not DOE PAGES specifically, and are typically subject to separate data-management-plan requirements set by the funding program office.

What does PAGES stand for?

Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science.

Is DOE PAGES the same as OSTI.GOV?

No, though they’re closely related. OSTI.GOV is the Department of Energy’s overall scientific and technical information search platform, covering reports, patents, software, and data in addition to publications. DOE PAGES is the publications-specific public access repository and discovery layer that OSTI operates within that broader ecosystem.

Who is responsible for depositing a DOE-funded manuscript?

The DOE-funded author and their institution, generally coordinated through the sponsored-research or grants office — not the publisher, except in cases where a CHORUS-participating publisher supplies the metadata link. Institutions should not assume publication in an open-access or hybrid journal automatically satisfies the DOE PAGES deposit requirement; the E-Link submission with the correct DOE contract number is still the operative compliance step.

What happens if a DOE-funded paper is never deposited?

DOE’s public access policy makes deposit a term of the award; non-compliance is a reportable compliance gap for the funded institution, similar in principle to unmet NIH or NSF public-access requirements, though enforcement mechanics are set by DOE and the specific award terms rather than by DOE PAGES itself. Research offices are best served by treating deposit tracking as a standard closeout/compliance checklist item for every DOE award, rather than relying on individual PIs to self-report.

Does the embargo-free policy apply retroactively to older publications?

No. The no-embargo rule applies to publications issued on or after October 1, 2024. Publications from before that date remain subject to whatever administrative interval (up to 12 months) applied under the prior policy at the time they were published.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →