Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Educational Research Methods: Designs, Standards, and Practice

A guide to educational research methods: empirical study designs, What Works Clearinghouse causal standards, IES SEER principles, and research practice.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Short answer

Educational research methods are the study designs, measurement approaches and analysis procedures used to investigate teaching, learning and education programs. They range from randomized controlled trials to qualitative case studies, and in the United States, federal quality expectations are set by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) Standards for Excellence in Education Research (SEER).

Definition and scope

Educational research methods (also called education research methods or methods of educational research) cover how studies of educational interventions and processes are designed, conducted and reported. Within the broader field of education research, these approaches address settings where students are grouped within classrooms, schools and districts.

The scope spans quantitative causal designs, qualitative inquiry and mixed-methods work. Two public standards documents anchor much of U.S. practice: the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook for judging causal evidence, and SEER for how IES-funded research is conducted and shared.

How many types of research methods are there?

There is no single official count. A common broad classification is quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. The WWC, for its part, publishes standards for several specific designs: group designs (which include randomized and quasi-experimental studies), regression discontinuity designs and single-case designs.

How the standards shape practice

The IES SEER standards are organized into four domains, which affect how a study is planned and reported:

  • Objectivity and scientific integrity: research free of predetermined conclusions, with all findings reported, uncertainty communicated and conflicts of interest disclosed.
  • Relevance: ties to student outcomes and support for generalizability.
  • Open science: studies are preregistered in a recognized registry (the Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies, REES, is one listed option), with data and methods shared. See our guide to study protocol preregistration.
  • Intervention research: documenting intervention components, using high-quality measures, measuring implementation fidelity, documenting the counterfactual condition and the treatment contrast, and analyzing cost.

Studies with human participants also need ethics oversight; see the IRB and research ethics committee approval process.

Types of educational research designs

Design family What it is used for Covered by WWC standards
Group designs (randomized and quasi-experimental) Estimating intervention effects by comparing groups Yes, under the WWC group design standards
Regression discontinuity design Estimating effects where assignment depends on a cutoff score Yes, with its own reporting guide
Single-case design Studying intervention effects on individual cases over time Yes, under the single-case design standards
Qualitative and mixed-methods studies Understanding context, experience and implementation Not covered by the causal standards; reporting expectations appear in the AERA reporting standards

WWC reviews rate studies as “Meets WWC Standards Without Reservations”, “Meets WWC Standards With Reservations” or “Does Not Meet WWC Standards”, evaluating factors such as attrition, baseline equivalence and confounding.

Why method choice matters

Method choice affects whether findings can be judged as causal evidence and whether they are useful to funders and decision makers. Funders such as the Spencer Foundation and the William T. Grant Foundation publish their own application criteria, so applicants should check each program’s current guidelines.

Common misunderstandings

  • Qualitative work is not evidence-free: the AERA reporting standards cover qualitative as well as quantitative and mixed-methods research and ask authors to disclose design, participants, data sources, analysis and the warrant for claims.
  • Statistical significance is not practical significance: with large samples, small differences can be statistically significant, so effect sizes are reported alongside p-values.
  • Clustering matters: students nested in classrooms and schools are not independent, and analyses that ignore this can understate uncertainty.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many types of research methods are there?

There is no official count. Methods are commonly grouped as quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods, and the WWC publishes standards for group, regression discontinuity and single-case designs.

What is the difference between internal and external validity in educational studies?

Internal validity is confidence that an intervention, rather than other factors, caused the observed change. External validity is how far findings generalize to other populations and settings. SEER’s relevance domain includes support for generalizability.

Why are effect sizes reported alongside p-values?

An effect size expresses the magnitude of a difference, while a p-value depends heavily on sample size, so both are needed to interpret a result.

Sources

  • Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education. “Standards for Excellence in Education Research (SEER).” https://ies.ed.gov/seer/ (checked 2026-11-07).
  • What Works Clearinghouse, IES. “Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0” and handbook resources. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks (checked 2026-11-07).
  • American Educational Research Association. “Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications,” Educational Researcher 35(6), 2006. https://www.aera.net/ (checked 2026-11-07).

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Educational Research Methods: Designs, Standards, and Practice

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →