Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI): Definition, Sources and Lab Impact

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) defined using FDA EMC guidance and FCC rules, with a vocabulary cross-walk and a facility checklist for labs and clinics.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Short answer: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) is an electromagnetic disturbance that degrades the performance of electrical or electronic equipment. In labs and clinics the practical concern is twofold: equipment must tolerate disturbances from its surroundings (immunity), and it must not emit disturbances that upset other equipment or radio services (emissions). This page sets out how FDA, the FCC and the IEC standards each use the vocabulary, so you can read device documentation and facility guidance consistently.

This is general reference information, not advice on any specific device, facility or incident.

Definition and scope

FDA’s guidance on electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of medical devices, issued June 6, 2022, defines EMC as the ability of a medical device to function safely and effectively in its intended electromagnetic environment, “including immunity to EM disturbances (i.e., interference), without introducing excessive EM disturbances (i.e., emissions) that might interfere with other equipment.” In that framing, interference is the disturbance as experienced by the affected equipment, immunity is the protection against it, and emissions are what the device itself puts out.

FDA lists radio waves, power surges, radiofrequency (RF) disturbances and electrostatic discharge (ESD) as examples of disturbances that can cause unacceptable degradation. It also states that interference can cause medical devices to not perform as intended and lead to hazardous situations, such as delays or errors in diagnosis, treatment or monitoring.

Where EMI comes from in practice

FDA’s recommendations for EMC and EMI in healthcare facilities name the following sources: common hand-held RF transmitters (for example cellular and PCS telephones and two-way radios), equipment used in intense electromagnetic environments such as near ambulance radios or in electrosurgery, and RF transmitters and all electrical and electronic equipment, including medical devices themselves. The same page frames the problem as a facility-level one, not only a device-level one.

The textbook description of EMI as a source, a coupling path and a receiver, and its split into conducted and radiated interference, is standard engineering background. Introductory material on this is available in What Is Electrical Engineering?; the sourced material below concerns how regulators and standards use the terms.

Same problem, three vocabularies

Source Term What the source says
FDA, EMC of Medical Devices (June 6, 2022) EMC, immunity, emissions EMC is the ability to function in the intended electromagnetic environment, including immunity to disturbances, without introducing excessive emissions. Emissions limits are established to protect radio services and minimize interference to other equipment, both medical and non-medical.
47 CFR 15.3(m), FCC Harmful interference Any emission, radiation or induction that endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or other safety services, or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunications service operating under that chapter.
47 CFR 15.3(o), (z), (n), FCC Intentional, unintentional and incidental radiators Three classes of device by how they generate RF energy (see next section).

The practical consequence is that “interference” is not one legal threshold. Under FDA’s EMC guidance it describes any disturbance that degrades a device; under the FCC rule, “harmful interference” is a narrower category tied to radio services and safety services.

Types of radiator under FCC rules

Class (47 CFR 15.3) Definition in the rule
Intentional radiator A device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.
Unintentional radiator A device that intentionally generates RF energy for use within the device, or sends RF signals by conduction to associated equipment via connecting wiring, but is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction.
Incidental radiator A device that generates RF energy during its operation although it is not intentionally designed to generate or emit it.

Where it matters for labs and clinics

Two standards families are named in FDA’s EMC guidance by equipment type: the IEC 60601 and 80601 series applies to medical devices that apply or transfer energy to a patient, and IEC 61010-1 applies to electrical laboratory equipment. See EN IEC 60601-1-2: the EMC standard for medical electrical equipment and IEC 61010-1: the lab equipment safety standard for each.

FDA’s healthcare-facility recommendations are a useful checklist for any site that runs sensitive electronics:

  • Assess the facility’s electromagnetic environment and identify areas that hold critical devices, such as the emergency room, intensive care and neonatal intensive care.
  • Coordinate the purchase, installation and servicing of electrical and electronic equipment.
  • Educate staff, contractors, visitors and patients about EMI.
  • Establish and implement written policies and procedures.
  • Report EMI problems to the FDA MedWatch program.

Research instruments that measure very weak signals are a related case. Biomagnetic measurement is one example, described in magnetoencephalography (MEG); see also EEG vs MEG.

Common misunderstandings

Is EMI only a radio problem?

No. FDA’s list of disturbances includes power surges and electrostatic discharge as well as radio waves and RF disturbances.

Is it only the receiving device that matters?

No. FDA’s definition of EMC covers both immunity of the device and the emissions it introduces into the environment.

Does “interference” always mean regulatory “harmful interference”?

No. Harmful interference is a defined term in 47 CFR 15.3(m), limited to disturbances that endanger or seriously degrade radio navigation, safety services or radiocommunications services.

FAQ

What does EMI stand for?

Electromagnetic interference. FDA’s guidance uses “EM disturbances (i.e., interference)” for the same idea.

What is the difference between EMI and EMC?

EMI is the disturbance. EMC is the ability of equipment to function in its electromagnetic environment, including immunity to interference and not introducing excessive emissions.

Can EMI affect medical devices?

FDA states that interference can cause medical devices to not perform as intended and lead to hazardous situations, such as delays or errors in diagnosis, treatment or monitoring.

Where should an EMI problem with a medical device be reported?

FDA’s healthcare-facility recommendations say to report EMI problems to the FDA MedWatch program.

Sources

  • FDA, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of Medical Devices, guidance issued June 6, 2022 (nonbinding): https://www.fda.gov/media/94758/download (read 2026-11-08)
  • FDA/CDRH, Recommendations for EMC/EMI in Healthcare Facilities: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/electromagnetic-compatibility-emc/fdacdrh-recommendations-emcemi-healthcare-facilities (read 2026-11-08)
  • 47 CFR 15.3, Definitions: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/15.3 (read 2026-11-08)

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Electromagnetic Interference (EMI): Definition, Sources and Lab Impact

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →